- [P20260219-230943] 2026-02-19 23:09:43 +0800
  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Unified E…
  - prompt:
```text
CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:

---
## TASK 1: Unified Export Directory Structure & .env Configuration
- **STATUS**: done
- **USER QUERIES**: 1-12 (from previous session)
- **DETAILS**: Created unified `export/` directory structure with three top-level categories: `ETL-Connectors/`, `SYSTEM/`, `BACKEND/`. Updated `.env`, `.env.template`, and `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env` with all path variables.
- **FILEPATHS**: `.env`, `.env.template`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env`

## TASK 2: Update LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md & Create EXPORT-PATHS.md
- **STATUS**: done
- **DETAILS**: Updated deployment docs and created `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` with directory overview, env variable mapping, code adaptation status.
- **FILEPATHS**: `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`, `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`

## TASK 3: Eliminate ALL hardcoded output paths — use .env exclusively
- **STATUS**: in-progress
- **USER QUERIES**: User said "不能都使用.env的配置么？现在都是写死的路径啊，不利于维护" and "我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，apps下的代码，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。以上，再检查一遍。"
- **DETAILS**:

### Completed work:
1. Created `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py` — shared utility with `get_output_path(env_var)` that does `load_dotenv` + read + mkdir + raises `KeyError` if missing
2. Updated `scripts/ops/` scripts to use `_env_paths.get_output_path()`:
   - `analyze_dataflow.py` — `resolve_output_dir()` now uses `get_output_path("SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT")`
   - `gen_dataflow_report.py` — `resolve_data_dir()` now uses `get_output_path("SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT")`
   - `gen_dataflow_doc.py` — `OUT` uses `_get_path("FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT")`
   - `gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` — `OUT` and `SAMPLE_DIR` use `_get_path()`
   - `gen_api_field_mapping.py` — `INPUT_DOC` uses `_get_path("FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT")`
   - `field_audit.py` — uses `get_output_path("FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT")`
   - `export_dwd_field_review.py` — uses `get_output_path("FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT")`
3. Updated ETL core modules to raise `KeyError`/`RuntimeError` when `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` missing:
   - `quality/integrity_service.py` — `write_report()` raises `KeyError`
   - `quality/integrity_checker.py` — `_default_report_path()` raises `KeyError`, removed extra `reports/` subdir
   - `tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py` — `REPORT_PATH` is `None` if env missing, `load()` raises `RuntimeError`
4. Updated ETL internal scripts `_build_report_path()` to use `ETL_REPORT_ROOT`:
   - `scripts/check/check_ods_content_hash.py`
   - `scripts/repair/repair_ods_content_hash.py`
   - `scripts/repair/dedupe_ods_snapshots.py`
5. Updated `REPORT_DIR` in ETL scripts to prefer `ETL_REPORT_ROOT`:
   - `scripts/run_compare_v3.py`
   - `scripts/run_compare_v3_fixed.py`
   - `scripts/full_api_refresh_v2.py`
   - `scripts/refresh_json_and_audit.py`
6. Updated `.env.template` — uncommented all SYSTEM/BACKEND path variables (they're now required)
7. Updated steering rule `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md` — strengthened to forbid hardcoded paths entirely
8. Updated `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py` — changed `test_fallback_to_docs_reports` to `test_fallback_raises_when_env_missing` expecting `KeyError` (BUT `import pytest` is missing from the test file — needs to be added)
9. Updated all docstring/comment path references in `scripts/ops/` to use `$ENV_VAR` notation
10. Updated `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` — removed old fallback path examples, removed "待适配" markers
11. Updated `.kiro/specs/dataflow-structure-audit/requirements.md` and `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/field_audit/field_investigation_report.md` — fixed stale path references

### Partially completed (last edits before context limit):
12. Fixed 3 of 4 remaining ETL internal scripts:
    - `scripts/debug/analyze_performance.py` — `_REPORTS_DIR` now reads `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` ✅
    - `scripts/check/check_ods_gaps.py` — `out_path` now reads `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` ✅
    - `scripts/compare_ods_vs_summary_v2.py` — `json_path` now reads `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` ✅

- **NEXT STEPS**:
  1. Fix `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/generate_report.py`:
     - Line 34: `REPORTS_DIR = ETL_ROOT / "docs" / "reports"` → change to `REPORTS_DIR = Path(os.environ.get("ETL_REPORT_ROOT", ETL_ROOT / "docs" / "reports"))`
     - Update docstring lines 9-13 (references to `docs/reports/`)
     - Ensure `import os` is present
  2. Add `import pytest` to `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py` (needed for `pytest.raises(KeyError)` in the updated test)
  3. Update `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` to reflect all the code changes made in this session (the document still has some stale code examples and descriptions from before the "no hardcoded fallback" policy)
  4. Final full-project scan to confirm zero remaining hardcoded output paths in code (excluding `.env`, `.env.template`, docs, and comments that use `$VAR` notation)
  5. Run ETL unit tests to verify nothing broke: `cd apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu && pytest tests/unit`
  6. Run property tests: `pytest tests/ -v` (will fail if `import pytest` not added)

- **FILEPATHS**:
  - `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py` (new shared utility)
  - `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`
  - `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`
  - `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_doc.py`
  - `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`
  - `scripts/ops/gen_api_field_mapping.py`
  - `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`
  - `scripts/ops/export_dwd_field_review.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_checker.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/check/check_ods_content_hash.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/check/check_ods_gaps.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/repair/repair_ods_content_hash.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/repair/dedupe_ods_snapshots.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/run_compare_v3.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/run_compare_v3_fixed.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/full_api_refresh_v2.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/refresh_json_and_audit.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/analyze_performance.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/generate_report.py` (STILL NEEDS FIX)
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/compare_ods_vs_summary_v2.py`
  - `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py` (NEEDS `import pytest`)
  - `.env.template`
  - `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md`
  - `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`

## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
- All output paths MUST be read from `.env` environment variables — no hardcoded fallback paths allowed (not even relative `export/...` paths)
- When env var is missing, code should raise explicit error (`KeyError`/`RuntimeError`), not silently fall back
- `scripts/ops/` scripts use shared `_env_paths.get_output_path()` utility
- ETL internal scripts use `os.environ.get("ETL_REPORT_ROOT")` + explicit error
- `.env.template` must have all path variables uncommented (required, not optional)
- All documentation and comments in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering rule)
- Code identifiers stay in English
- Audit prompt_logs (`docs/audit/prompt_logs/`) are historical records and must NOT be modified
- This change touches high-risk paths (quality/, tasks/, utils/, root files) — audit required but user hasn't run `/audit` yet

## Files to read
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/generate_report.py`
- `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py`
- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
- `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py`
- `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md`
- `.env.template`

USER QUERIES(most recent first):
1. 我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，apps下的代码，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。以上，再检查一遍。另外，不能都使用.env的配置么？现在都是写死的路径啊，不利于维护。
2. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
3. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
4. 我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，apps下的代码，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。以上，再检查一遍。另外，不能都使用.env的配置么？现在都是写死的路径啊，不利于维护。
5. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
6. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
7. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
8. 继续
9. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
10. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
11. # New SessionExported: 2026/2/19 22:46:58## Steering Documents**Workspace:**- language-zh.md- product.md- structure.md- tech.md- governance.md- db-docs.md- structure-lite.md- export-paths.md---**User:**## TASK 1: Unified Export Directory Structure & .env Configuration- **STATUS**: done- **USER QUERIES**: 1 ("docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建...通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。")- **DETAILS**:* Created unified `export/` directory structure with three top-level categories: `ETL-Connectors/`, `SYSTEM/`, `BACKEND/`* Migrated old data from `export/ETL/`, `export/dataflow_analysis/`, `export/field_audit/` to new paths and deleted old directories* Updated `.env` (root), `.env.template`, and `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env` with all new path variables* Added `.gitkeep` files to preserve empty directories* New environment variables added: `ETL_REPORT_ROOT`, `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT`, `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT`, `API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT`, `SYSTEM_LOG_ROOT`, `BACKEND_LOG_ROOT`* Existing variables updated to new paths: `EXPORT_ROOT`, `LOG_ROOT`, `FETCH_ROOT`, `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT`- **FILEPATHS**: `.env`, `.env.template`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env`Final directory structure:```export/├── ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/│   ├── JSON/          — API 原始 JSON 导出│   ├── LOGS/          — ETL 运行日志│   └── REPORTS/       — ETL 质检/完整性报告├── SYSTEM/│   ├── LOGS/          — 系统级运维日志│   ├── REPORTS/│   │   ├── dataflow_analysis/  — 数据流结构分析报告│   │   ├── field_audit/        — 字段排查报告│   │   └── full_dataflow_doc/  — 全链路数据流文档│   └── CACHE/│       └── api_samples/        — API 样本缓存└── BACKEND/└── LOGS/          — 后端结构化日志（预留）```## TASK 2: Update LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md & Create EXPORT-PATHS.md- **STATUS**: done- **USER QUERIES**: 2 ("继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。")- **DETAILS**:* Updated `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`:- Changed "最后更新" date to 2026-02-20- Replaced server directory creation commands (removed standalone `test\logs` and `prod\logs`, added note pointing to EXPORT-PATHS.md)- Added output path env vars to both test and prod `.env` examples* Created `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` with:- Directory overview, env variable mapping table- Detailed per-directory documentation (purpose, env var, config loading chain, code usage, sample output)- Code adaptation status table (✅ for already working, ❌ for needs code changes)- Server environment config examples for dev/test/prod- **FILEPATHS**: `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`, `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`## TASK 3: Adapt Code to Read New Export Path Variables- **STATUS**: in-progress- **USER QUERIES**: 3 ("本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？")- **DETAILS**:* Agent analyzed which code already works (4 paths) vs needs changes (4 files)* Already working (no code changes needed): `EXPORT_ROOT`, `LOG_ROOT`, `FETCH_ROOT` (via `env_parser.py` → `AppConfig`), `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT` (via `os.environ.get()` in `gen_dataflow_report.py`)* Searched for md docs referencing old paths — only `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md` line 88 has a stale reference (`apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/export/JSON/`). Audit prompt_logs should NOT be modified.* Agent was about to start code changes when context limit hit- **NEXT STEPS**:* Modify 4 code files to read new env variables:1. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py` — `write_report()` function: add `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var as default root instead of hardcoded `Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "reports"`2. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py` — `REPORT_PATH` class attribute: read from `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var or config instead of hardcoded `Path("reports/dwd_quality_report.json")`3. `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` — Lines 27-28: Change `OUT` to read `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT` env var, change `SAMPLE_DIR` to read `API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT` env var4. `scripts/ops/field_audit.py` — Default output path: read `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT` env var instead of hardcoded path* Update 1 md doc:- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md` line 88: update stale path reference* After code changes, update `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` adaptation status table (flip ❌ to ✅)- **FILEPATHS**:- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`- `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`- `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md`- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS- User's original intent was to modify the LAUNCH-CHECKLIST deployment doc (move logs into export/) and create export directory structure for deployment planning. Agent went further and also restructured the actual local project — user said "这样也不错" (that's fine too).- All documentation and comments must be in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering rule)- Code identifiers stay in English- Audit prompt_logs (`docs/audit/prompt_logs/`) are historical records and must NOT be modified- Config priority: `defaults.py` < root `.env` < app `.env` < env vars < CLI args- ETL path config flows through `env_parser.py` `ENV_MAP` → `AppConfig` `io.*` section- System-level scripts read paths directly via `os.environ.get()` or `python-dotenv`- This change touches root `.env` files (governance: root-file audit required). User was reminded but hasn't run `/audit` yet.## KEY CODE ARCHITECTURE- ETL config chain: `config/defaults.py` (DEFAULTS dict) → `config/env_parser.py` (ENV_MAP + load_env_overrides) → `config/settings.py` (AppConfig.load())- `ENV_MAP` maps env var names to dotted config paths, e.g. `"EXPORT_ROOT": ("io.export_root",)`- `task_executor.py._attach_run_file_logger()` reads `self.config["io"]["log_root"]`- `json_store.py.dump_json()` is the low-level JSON writer; ODS tasks pass paths derived from config- `integrity_service.py.write_report()` has `report_path` param but defaults to hardcoded ETL-internal `reports/` dir- `gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` has hardcoded `OUT` and `SAMPLE_DIR` at module level (lines 27-28)## Files to read- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`- `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`- `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md`- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/config/env_parser.py`- `.env`USER QUERIES(most recent first):1. 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？2. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 03. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 04. 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？5. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 06. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 07. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 08. 我的本意是：docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md修改：将logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。-------------结果你将现在的项目也这么做了，这样也不错。那么，继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。9. Output:Hook execution failed with exit code 1.Error output:[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (dir:admin-web, dir:backend, root-file). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)Exit Code: 110. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 011. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 012. docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。---**Assistant:**继续上次未完成的 TASK 3，先读取需要修改的文件。好，文件都读完了。`gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` 被截断了，我需要确认 `OUT` 和 `SAMPLE_DIR` 的位置（已在前 30 行看到），不需要读后面的内容。现在开始执行 4 个代码文件的适配 + 1 个 md 文档修复 + EXPORT-PATHS.md 状态表更新。现在更新 `EXPORT-PATHS.md` 的代码适配状态表，把 4 个 ❌ 翻转为 ✅：同时更新 EXPORT-PATHS.md 中对应章节的"适配建议"为"已适配"描述：最后检查一下改动的文件有没有语法问题：全部完成。总结一下：修改了 4 个代码文件，让它们读取新的 `export/` 路径环境变量（`ETL_REPORT_ROOT`、`FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT`、`FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT`、`API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT`），均保留了合理的回退默认值。同步更新了 `design.md` 中的过期路径引用，以及 `EXPORT-PATHS.md` 的适配状态表和各章节描述。所有输出路径现在统一由 `.env` 驱动，开发机无需额外操作即可生效。---**User:**对了，我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。---**Assistant:**明白，你需要一条 steering 规则，让所有未来的对话、Spec、hooks、skills、MCP 交互中，凡是涉及文件输出的场景都遵循 `export/` 路径规范。先看下现有的 steering 文件，确认放置位置和风格：好，创建一条 always-included 的 steering 规则，确保所有输出都走 `export/` 路径规范。好，steering 规则已经生效了。现在起所有对话、Spec、hooks、skills、MCP 中涉及文件输出的场景都会自动遵循 `export/` 路径规范。还有一个遗留的脚本需要检查一下——你打开的 `scripts/ops/export_dwd_field_review.py`，看看它是否也有硬编码输出路径需要适配。果然，这个脚本也有硬编码路径 `export/field_audit`，需要适配到 `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT` 环境变量：同时更新文件头部的注释，让它反映新路径：再扫一下 `scripts/ops/` 下还有没有其他脚本有硬编码输出路径：这个是 `gen_dataflow_report.py` 的回退路径，看看它是否应该指向新的 `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/`：回退路径还是旧的 `export/dataflow_analysis`，需要更新：-----------------继续
---

METADATA:
The previous conversation had 6 messages.

INSTRUCTIONS:
Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
```
