- [P20260219-221825] 2026-02-19 22:18:25 +0800
  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Unified E…
  - prompt:
```text
CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:

---
## TASK 1: Unified Export Directory Structure & .env Configuration

- **STATUS**: done
- **USER QUERIES**: 1 ("docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建...通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。")
- **DETAILS**:
  * Created unified `export/` directory structure with three top-level categories: `ETL-Connectors/`, `SYSTEM/`, `BACKEND/`
  * Migrated old data from `export/ETL/`, `export/dataflow_analysis/`, `export/field_audit/` to new paths and deleted old directories
  * Updated `.env` (root), `.env.template`, and `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env` with all new path variables
  * Added `.gitkeep` files to preserve empty directories
  * New environment variables added: `ETL_REPORT_ROOT`, `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT`, `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT`, `API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT`, `SYSTEM_LOG_ROOT`, `BACKEND_LOG_ROOT`
  * Existing variables updated to new paths: `EXPORT_ROOT`, `LOG_ROOT`, `FETCH_ROOT`, `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT`
- **FILEPATHS**: `.env`, `.env.template`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env`

Final directory structure:
```
export/
├── ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/
│   ├── JSON/          — API 原始 JSON 导出
│   ├── LOGS/          — ETL 运行日志
│   └── REPORTS/       — ETL 质检/完整性报告
├── SYSTEM/
│   ├── LOGS/          — 系统级运维日志
│   ├── REPORTS/
│   │   ├── dataflow_analysis/  — 数据流结构分析报告
│   │   ├── field_audit/        — 字段排查报告
│   │   └── full_dataflow_doc/  — 全链路数据流文档
│   └── CACHE/
│       └── api_samples/        — API 样本缓存
└── BACKEND/
    └── LOGS/          — 后端结构化日志（预留）
```

## TASK 2: Update LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md & Create EXPORT-PATHS.md

- **STATUS**: done
- **USER QUERIES**: 2 ("继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。")
- **DETAILS**:
  * Updated `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`:
    - Changed "最后更新" date to 2026-02-20
    - Replaced server directory creation commands (removed standalone `test\logs` and `prod\logs`, added note pointing to EXPORT-PATHS.md)
    - Added output path env vars to both test and prod `.env` examples
  * Created `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` with:
    - Directory overview, env variable mapping table
    - Detailed per-directory documentation (purpose, env var, config loading chain, code usage, sample output)
    - Code adaptation status table (✅ for already working, ❌ for needs code changes)
    - Server environment config examples for dev/test/prod
- **FILEPATHS**: `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`, `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`

## TASK 3: Adapt Code to Read New Export Path Variables

- **STATUS**: in-progress
- **USER QUERIES**: 3 ("本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？")
- **DETAILS**:
  * Agent analyzed which code already works (4 paths) vs needs changes (4 files)
  * Already working (no code changes needed): `EXPORT_ROOT`, `LOG_ROOT`, `FETCH_ROOT` (via `env_parser.py` → `AppConfig`), `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT` (via `os.environ.get()` in `gen_dataflow_report.py`)
  * Searched for md docs referencing old paths — only `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md` line 88 has a stale reference (`apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/export/JSON/`). Audit prompt_logs should NOT be modified.
  * Agent was about to start code changes when context limit hit
- **NEXT STEPS**:
  * Modify 4 code files to read new env variables:
    1. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py` — `write_report()` function: add `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var as default root instead of hardcoded `Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "reports"`
    2. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py` — `REPORT_PATH` class attribute: read from `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var or config instead of hardcoded `Path("reports/dwd_quality_report.json")`
    3. `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` — Lines 27-28: Change `OUT` to read `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT` env var, change `SAMPLE_DIR` to read `API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT` env var
    4. `scripts/ops/field_audit.py` — Default output path: read `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT` env var instead of hardcoded path
  * Update 1 md doc:
    - `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md` line 88: update stale path reference
  * After code changes, update `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` adaptation status table (flip ❌ to ✅)
- **FILEPATHS**:
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`
  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`
  - `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`
  - `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`
  - `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md`
  - `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`

## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

- User's original intent was to modify the LAUNCH-CHECKLIST deployment doc (move logs into export/) and create export directory structure for deployment planning. Agent went further and also restructured the actual local project — user said "这样也不错" (that's fine too).
- All documentation and comments must be in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering rule)
- Code identifiers stay in English
- Audit prompt_logs (`docs/audit/prompt_logs/`) are historical records and must NOT be modified
- Config priority: `defaults.py` < root `.env` < app `.env` < env vars < CLI args
- ETL path config flows through `env_parser.py` `ENV_MAP` → `AppConfig` `io.*` section
- System-level scripts read paths directly via `os.environ.get()` or `python-dotenv`
- This change touches root `.env` files (governance: root-file audit required). User was reminded but hasn't run `/audit` yet.

## KEY CODE ARCHITECTURE

- ETL config chain: `config/defaults.py` (DEFAULTS dict) → `config/env_parser.py` (ENV_MAP + load_env_overrides) → `config/settings.py` (AppConfig.load())
- `ENV_MAP` maps env var names to dotted config paths, e.g. `"EXPORT_ROOT": ("io.export_root",)`
- `task_executor.py._attach_run_file_logger()` reads `self.config["io"]["log_root"]`
- `json_store.py.dump_json()` is the low-level JSON writer; ODS tasks pass paths derived from config
- `integrity_service.py.write_report()` has `report_path` param but defaults to hardcoded ETL-internal `reports/` dir
- `gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` has hardcoded `OUT` and `SAMPLE_DIR` at module level (lines 27-28)

## Files to read

- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`
- `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`
- `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`
- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md`
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/config/env_parser.py`
- `.env`

USER QUERIES(most recent first):
1. 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？
2. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
3. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
4. 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？
5. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
6. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
7. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
8. 我的本意是：docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md修改：将logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。-------------结果你将现在的项目也这么做了，这样也不错。那么，继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。
9. Output:
Hook execution failed with exit code 1.

Error output:
[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (dir:admin-web, dir:backend, root-file). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)



Exit Code: 1
10. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
11. Output:
Command executed successfully with no output.

Exit Code: 0
12. docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。
---

METADATA:
The previous conversation had 6 messages.

INSTRUCTIONS:
Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
```
