- [P20260219-224753] 2026-02-19 22:47:53 +0800
  - summary: # New SessionExported: 2026/2/19 22:46:58## Steering Documents**Workspace:**- language-zh.md- product.md- structure.md- …
  - prompt:
```text
# New SessionExported: 2026/2/19 22:46:58## Steering Documents**Workspace:**- language-zh.md- product.md- structure.md- tech.md- governance.md- db-docs.md- structure-lite.md- export-paths.md---**User:**## TASK 1: Unified Export Directory Structure & .env Configuration- **STATUS**: done- **USER QUERIES**: 1 ("docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建...通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。")- **DETAILS**:* Created unified `export/` directory structure with three top-level categories: `ETL-Connectors/`, `SYSTEM/`, `BACKEND/`* Migrated old data from `export/ETL/`, `export/dataflow_analysis/`, `export/field_audit/` to new paths and deleted old directories* Updated `.env` (root), `.env.template`, and `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env` with all new path variables* Added `.gitkeep` files to preserve empty directories* New environment variables added: `ETL_REPORT_ROOT`, `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT`, `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT`, `API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT`, `SYSTEM_LOG_ROOT`, `BACKEND_LOG_ROOT`* Existing variables updated to new paths: `EXPORT_ROOT`, `LOG_ROOT`, `FETCH_ROOT`, `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT`- **FILEPATHS**: `.env`, `.env.template`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env`Final directory structure:```export/├── ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/│   ├── JSON/          — API 原始 JSON 导出│   ├── LOGS/          — ETL 运行日志│   └── REPORTS/       — ETL 质检/完整性报告├── SYSTEM/│   ├── LOGS/          — 系统级运维日志│   ├── REPORTS/│   │   ├── dataflow_analysis/  — 数据流结构分析报告│   │   ├── field_audit/        — 字段排查报告│   │   └── full_dataflow_doc/  — 全链路数据流文档│   └── CACHE/│       └── api_samples/        — API 样本缓存└── BACKEND/└── LOGS/          — 后端结构化日志（预留）```## TASK 2: Update LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md & Create EXPORT-PATHS.md- **STATUS**: done- **USER QUERIES**: 2 ("继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。")- **DETAILS**:* Updated `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`:- Changed "最后更新" date to 2026-02-20- Replaced server directory creation commands (removed standalone `test\logs` and `prod\logs`, added note pointing to EXPORT-PATHS.md)- Added output path env vars to both test and prod `.env` examples* Created `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` with:- Directory overview, env variable mapping table- Detailed per-directory documentation (purpose, env var, config loading chain, code usage, sample output)- Code adaptation status table (✅ for already working, ❌ for needs code changes)- Server environment config examples for dev/test/prod- **FILEPATHS**: `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`, `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`## TASK 3: Adapt Code to Read New Export Path Variables- **STATUS**: in-progress- **USER QUERIES**: 3 ("本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？")- **DETAILS**:* Agent analyzed which code already works (4 paths) vs needs changes (4 files)* Already working (no code changes needed): `EXPORT_ROOT`, `LOG_ROOT`, `FETCH_ROOT` (via `env_parser.py` → `AppConfig`), `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT` (via `os.environ.get()` in `gen_dataflow_report.py`)* Searched for md docs referencing old paths — only `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md` line 88 has a stale reference (`apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/export/JSON/`). Audit prompt_logs should NOT be modified.* Agent was about to start code changes when context limit hit- **NEXT STEPS**:* Modify 4 code files to read new env variables:1. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py` — `write_report()` function: add `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var as default root instead of hardcoded `Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "reports"`2. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py` — `REPORT_PATH` class attribute: read from `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var or config instead of hardcoded `Path("reports/dwd_quality_report.json")`3. `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` — Lines 27-28: Change `OUT` to read `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT` env var, change `SAMPLE_DIR` to read `API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT` env var4. `scripts/ops/field_audit.py` — Default output path: read `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT` env var instead of hardcoded path* Update 1 md doc:- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md` line 88: update stale path reference* After code changes, update `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` adaptation status table (flip ❌ to ✅)- **FILEPATHS**:- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`- `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`- `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md`- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS- User's original intent was to modify the LAUNCH-CHECKLIST deployment doc (move logs into export/) and create export directory structure for deployment planning. Agent went further and also restructured the actual local project — user said "这样也不错" (that's fine too).- All documentation and comments must be in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering rule)- Code identifiers stay in English- Audit prompt_logs (`docs/audit/prompt_logs/`) are historical records and must NOT be modified- Config priority: `defaults.py` < root `.env` < app `.env` < env vars < CLI args- ETL path config flows through `env_parser.py` `ENV_MAP` → `AppConfig` `io.*` section- System-level scripts read paths directly via `os.environ.get()` or `python-dotenv`- This change touches root `.env` files (governance: root-file audit required). User was reminded but hasn't run `/audit` yet.## KEY CODE ARCHITECTURE- ETL config chain: `config/defaults.py` (DEFAULTS dict) → `config/env_parser.py` (ENV_MAP + load_env_overrides) → `config/settings.py` (AppConfig.load())- `ENV_MAP` maps env var names to dotted config paths, e.g. `"EXPORT_ROOT": ("io.export_root",)`- `task_executor.py._attach_run_file_logger()` reads `self.config["io"]["log_root"]`- `json_store.py.dump_json()` is the low-level JSON writer; ODS tasks pass paths derived from config- `integrity_service.py.write_report()` has `report_path` param but defaults to hardcoded ETL-internal `reports/` dir- `gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` has hardcoded `OUT` and `SAMPLE_DIR` at module level (lines 27-28)## Files to read- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`- `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`- `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md`- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/config/env_parser.py`- `.env`USER QUERIES(most recent first):1. 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？2. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 03. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 04. 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？5. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 06. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 07. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 08. 我的本意是：docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md修改：将logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。-------------结果你将现在的项目也这么做了，这样也不错。那么，继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。9. Output:Hook execution failed with exit code 1.Error output:[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (dir:admin-web, dir:backend, root-file). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)Exit Code: 110. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 011. Output:Command executed successfully with no output.Exit Code: 012. docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。---**Assistant:**继续上次未完成的 TASK 3，先读取需要修改的文件。好，文件都读完了。`gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` 被截断了，我需要确认 `OUT` 和 `SAMPLE_DIR` 的位置（已在前 30 行看到），不需要读后面的内容。现在开始执行 4 个代码文件的适配 + 1 个 md 文档修复 + EXPORT-PATHS.md 状态表更新。现在更新 `EXPORT-PATHS.md` 的代码适配状态表，把 4 个 ❌ 翻转为 ✅：同时更新 EXPORT-PATHS.md 中对应章节的"适配建议"为"已适配"描述：最后检查一下改动的文件有没有语法问题：全部完成。总结一下：修改了 4 个代码文件，让它们读取新的 `export/` 路径环境变量（`ETL_REPORT_ROOT`、`FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT`、`FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT`、`API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT`），均保留了合理的回退默认值。同步更新了 `design.md` 中的过期路径引用，以及 `EXPORT-PATHS.md` 的适配状态表和各章节描述。所有输出路径现在统一由 `.env` 驱动，开发机无需额外操作即可生效。---**User:**对了，我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。---**Assistant:**明白，你需要一条 steering 规则，让所有未来的对话、Spec、hooks、skills、MCP 交互中，凡是涉及文件输出的场景都遵循 `export/` 路径规范。先看下现有的 steering 文件，确认放置位置和风格：好，创建一条 always-included 的 steering 规则，确保所有输出都走 `export/` 路径规范。好，steering 规则已经生效了。现在起所有对话、Spec、hooks、skills、MCP 中涉及文件输出的场景都会自动遵循 `export/` 路径规范。还有一个遗留的脚本需要检查一下——你打开的 `scripts/ops/export_dwd_field_review.py`，看看它是否也有硬编码输出路径需要适配。果然，这个脚本也有硬编码路径 `export/field_audit`，需要适配到 `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT` 环境变量：同时更新文件头部的注释，让它反映新路径：再扫一下 `scripts/ops/` 下还有没有其他脚本有硬编码输出路径：这个是 `gen_dataflow_report.py` 的回退路径，看看它是否应该指向新的 `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/`：回退路径还是旧的 `export/dataflow_analysis`，需要更新：-----------------继续
```
