在准备环境前提交次全部更改。

2026-02-19 08:35:13 +08:00
parent ded6dfb9d8
commit 4eac07da47
1387 changed files with 6107191 additions and 33002 deletions
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_151358.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_151358.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-151358] 2026-02-15 15:13:58 +0800
+  - summary: (empty prompt)
+  - prompt:
+```text
+
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_151826.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_151826.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-151826] 2026-02-15 15:18:26 +0800
+  - summary: (empty prompt)
+  - prompt:
+```text
+
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_152000.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_152000.md
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+- [P20260215-152000] 2026-02-15 15:20:00 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Fix audit…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Fix audit_flagger.ps1 PowerShell 5.1 parsing errors
+- **STATUS**: done (approach abandoned → replaced with Python)
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1 ("重建 Codebase indexing"), 2 (continued debugging)
+- **DETAILS**: The original `audit_flagger.ps1` had persistent parsing errors in Windows PowerShell 5.1. The parser couldn't handle `@{}` hashtable literals and multi-line script blocks inside `try{}` blocks. Multiple fix attempts failed (multi-line hashtables, string-based rules, removing try/catch). Eventually abandoned PowerShell entirely and rewrote all 3 scripts in Python.
+- **FILEPATHS**: `.kiro/scripts/audit_flagger.ps1` (deleted)
+
+## TASK 2: Rewrite all .kiro/scripts from PowerShell to Python
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 2, 3, 4, 5
+- **DETAILS**: All 3 PowerShell scripts converted to Python equivalents. All tested and verified with exit code 0:
+  - `audit_flagger.ps1` → `audit_flagger.py` — scans git status, matches high-risk paths, writes `.kiro/.audit_state.json`
+  - `audit_reminder.ps1` → `audit_reminder.py` — 15-min rate-limited reminder on agentStop
+  - `prompt_audit_log.ps1` → `prompt_audit_log.py` — logs each prompt to `docs/audit/prompt_logs/`
+- All 3 hook files updated to call `python .kiro/scripts/<name>.py` instead of `powershell -File`
+- Verified: `grep powershell .kiro/hooks/**` returns no matches
+- **FILEPATHS**: `.kiro/scripts/audit_flagger.py`, `.kiro/scripts/audit_reminder.py`, `.kiro/scripts/prompt_audit_log.py`
+
+## TASK 3: Update .kiro configuration for NeoZQYY Monorepo
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: 3 ("完成.kiro的更新：依据其迁移前的功能，完善修改在此项目中Kiro相应的hooks,steering,skills,mcp配置的更新")
+- **DETAILS**: 
+  - **Hooks**: All 7 hook files already had `workspaceFolderName: "NeoZQYY"`. Commands updated from PS to Python. No other hook changes needed.
+  - **Steering files updated**:
+    - `product.md` — rewritten for Monorepo (multi-subsystem, site_id+RLS)
+    - `tech.md` — rewritten (uv workspace, 6-layer schema, FastAPI, hypothesis)
+    - `structure-lite.md` — rewritten (new top-level dirs, new high-risk paths)
+    - `structure.md` — rewritten (full Monorepo tree, manual inclusion)
+    - `governance.md` — rewritten (high-risk paths updated to `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/...`, `apps/backend/app/`, `packages/shared/`, `db/`)
+    - `language-zh.md` — no changes needed
+    - `db-docs.md` — no changes needed (uses `**/*.sql` wildcards, still valid)
+    - `steering-readme-maintainer.md` — no changes needed
+  - **MCP**: Workspace-level `mcp.json` updated to override git server repo path from `C:\ZQYY\FQ-ETL` to `C:\NeoZQYY`
+  - **Skills**: 3 skills kept as-is (`bd-manual-db-docs`, `change-annotation-audit`, `steering-readme-maintainer`)
+  - **Agents**: `audit-writer.md` already references Monorepo paths (was updated during migration)
+  - **NOT YET DONE**: 
+    - The `governance.md` steering-reminder cache still shows OLD content in Kiro's injection (with bare `api/`, `cli/` paths). The file itself is correct on disk. This is a Kiro caching issue that should resolve on next session.
+    - Skills SKILL.md files were NOT checked/updated for path references — they may still reference old FQ-ETL paths
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  - Check and update skill SKILL.md files for old path references: `.kiro/skills/bd-manual-db-docs/SKILL.md`, `.kiro/skills/change-annotation-audit/SKILL.md`, `.kiro/skills/steering-readme-maintainer/SKILL.md`
+  - Check skill asset templates for old path references
+  - Verify `audit-writer.md` agent definition has no stale references
+- **FILEPATHS**: `.kiro/steering/governance.md`, `.kiro/steering/product.md`, `.kiro/steering/tech.md`, `.kiro/steering/structure-lite.md`, `.kiro/steering/structure.md`, `.kiro/settings/mcp.json`, `.kiro/hooks/audit-flagger.kiro.hook`, `.kiro/hooks/audit-reminder.kiro.hook`, `.kiro/hooks/prompt-audit-log.kiro.hook`
+
+## TASK 4: Clean up old project SPECS
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 3 ("清理旧项目SPECS")
+- **DETAILS**: All 5 completed specs deleted: `bd-manual-docs-consolidation`, `docs-optimization`, `etl-task-documentation`, `monorepo-migration`, `repo-audit`. Also `scheduler-refactor` (was "规划中") got deleted in the batch. `.kiro/specs/` is now empty.
+- **FILEPATHS**: `.kiro/specs/` (empty)
+
+## TASK 5: Rebuild Codebase indexing
+- **STATUS**: not-started
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1, 3 ("重建 Codebase indexing")
+- **DETAILS**: User explicitly requested rebuilding codebase indexing. This was the original request but got sidetracked by the PS1 parsing errors. The steering files are now updated with correct Monorepo paths which should help indexing. No explicit "rebuild index" action was taken — this may be a Kiro IDE feature the user needs to trigger manually, or it may auto-rebuild based on updated steering files.
+- **NEXT STEPS**: Determine if any manual action is needed to rebuild Kiro's codebase index, or if the updated steering files are sufficient.
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- User provided `docs/monorepo-migration-summary.md` as the authoritative reference for all path mappings and configuration changes
+- User said "我看你处理的好费劲" (you're struggling) — indicating preference for efficient, decisive action
+- All output must be in simplified Chinese (per `language-zh.md`)
+- The project uses Windows (win32, cmd shell) with Python available via conda (base)
+- PowerShell 5.1 on this machine has severe parsing bugs — avoid PS scripts, use Python instead
+- Governance rules require audit for high-risk path changes, but this `.kiro/` infrastructure work is exempt from audit
+
+## Files to read:
+- `docs/monorepo-migration-summary.md` — authoritative migration reference with complete path mappings and config checklist
+- `.kiro/skills/bd-manual-db-docs/SKILL.md` — needs path reference check
+- `.kiro/skills/change-annotation-audit/SKILL.md` — needs path reference check  
+- `.kiro/skills/steering-readme-maintainer/SKILL.md` — needs path reference check
+- `.kiro/skills/change-annotation-audit/assets/audit-record-template.md` — needs path reference check
+- `.kiro/skills/bd-manual-db-docs/assets/schema-changelog-template.md` — needs path reference check
+- `.kiro/agents/audit-writer.md` — verify no stale references
+- `.kiro/scripts/audit_flagger.py` — the working Python replacement
+- `.kiro/steering/governance.md` — recently rewritten, verify correct
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 我看你处理的好费劲。给你个参考文档：docs\monorepo-migration-summary.md，并根据参考文档完成这些任务：- 完成当前任务，或者回滚修改ps1脚本。- 重建 Codebase indexing。- 完成.kiro的更新：依据其迁移前的功能，完善修改在此项目中Kiro相应的hooks,steering,skills,mcp配置的更新。- 清理旧项目SPECS。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 我看你处理的好费劲。给你个参考文档：docs\monorepo-migration-summary.md，并根据参考文档完成这些任务：- 完成当前任务，或者回滚修改ps1脚本。- 重建 Codebase indexing。- 完成.kiro的更新：依据其迁移前的功能，完善修改在此项目中Kiro相应的hooks,steering,skills,mcp配置的更新。- 清理旧项目SPECS。
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>λ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD> C:\NeoZQYY\.kiro\scripts\audit_flagger.ps1:19 <20>ַ<EFBFBD>: 5
+
+ try {
+
+     ~
+
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>Ͷ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>ȱ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>ҡ<EFBFBD>}<7D><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>
+
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>λ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD> C:\NeoZQYY\.kiro\scripts\audit_flagger.ps1:72 <20>ַ<EFBFBD>: 40
+
+     @{ Pattern = "^db/"; Label = "db" }
+
+                                        ~
+
+Try <20><><EFBFBD>ȱ<EFBFBD><C8B1><EFBFBD>Լ<EFBFBD><D4BC><EFBFBD> Catch <20><> Finally <20>顣
+
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>λ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD> C:\NeoZQYY\.kiro\scripts\audit_flagger.ps1:73 <20>ַ<EFBFBD>: 3
+
+   )
+
+   ~
+
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>ʽ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>а<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>ı<EFBFBD>ǡ<EFBFBD>)<29><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>
+
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>λ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD> C:\NeoZQYY\.kiro\scripts\audit_flagger.ps1:94 <20>ַ<EFBFBD>: 5
+
+     }
+
+     ~
+
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>ʽ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>а<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>ı<EFBFBD>ǡ<EFBFBD>}<7D><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>
+
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>λ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD> C:\NeoZQYY\.kiro\scripts\audit_flagger.ps1:95 <20>ַ<EFBFBD>: 3
+
+   }
+
+   ~
+
+<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>ʽ<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>а<EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>ı<EFBFBD>ǡ<EFBFBD>}<7D><><EFBFBD><EFBFBD>
+
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_152303.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_152303.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-152303] 2026-02-15 15:23:03 +0800
+  - summary: MCP 服务器本身启动了（能路由请求），但它尝试调用 http://127.0.0.1:8000/health 时后端没跑。这是预期的 — 我的 FastAPI 后端还没启动。我要让FastAPI成功启动，需要怎么操作，你能帮我实现么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+MCP 服务器本身启动了（能路由请求），但它尝试调用 http://127.0.0.1:8000/health 时后端没跑。这是预期的 — 我的 FastAPI 后端还没启动。我要让FastAPI成功启动，需要怎么操作，你能帮我实现么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_152512.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_152512.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-152512] 2026-02-15 15:25:12 +0800
+  - summary: GUI是过度的一个管理工具。参考有关README.md 和 docs\monorepo-migration-summary.md 文档以及GUI实现代码，去了解GUI的全貌。现在，是时候使用一个BS架构替代它了。帮我实现这个项目，并放在合适…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+GUI是过度的一个管理工具。参考有关README.md 和 docs\monorepo-migration-summary.md 文档以及GUI实现代码，去了解GUI的全貌。现在，是时候使用一个BS架构替代它了。帮我实现这个项目，并放在合适的目录之下。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_152800.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_152800.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-152800] 2026-02-15 15:28:00 +0800
+  - summary: 再尝试下，看看现在状态正常了吗
+  - prompt:
+```text
+再尝试下，看看现在状态正常了吗
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_154512.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_154512.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-154512] 2026-02-15 15:45:12 +0800
+  - summary: 此项目是由旧项目扩展迁移而来（参考文档docs\monorepo-migration-summary.md）。查看现在的.kiro，对比老的kiro配置（参考文档docs\oldworkspace-kiro-agent-config-sum…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+此项目是由旧项目扩展迁移而来（参考文档docs\monorepo-migration-summary.md）。查看现在的.kiro，对比老的kiro配置（参考文档docs\oldworkspace-kiro-agent-config-summary.md），能否对现在的.kiro下的配置在节省上下文长度优化、性能、可靠性 3个方面进行优化？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_155010.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_155010.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-155010] 2026-02-15 15:50:10 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_155333.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_155333.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-155333] 2026-02-15 15:53:33 +0800
+  - summary: 功能完整度上有没有打折？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+功能完整度上有没有打折？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_160137.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_160137.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-160137] 2026-02-15 16:01:37 +0800
+  - summary: 随着项目的完善和开发啊，适当时候更新 steering里的内容，这个功能是由什么触发的？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+随着项目的完善和开发啊，适当时候更新 steering里的内容，这个功能是由什么触发的？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_160249.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_160249.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-160249] 2026-02-15 16:02:49 +0800
+  - summary: 还有旧项目的ps1脚本相关内容，当前新项目如何处理的？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+还有旧项目的ps1脚本相关内容，当前新项目如何处理的？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_162030.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_162030.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-162030] 2026-02-15 16:20:30 +0800
+  - summary: 审查db目录，并更新/建立相应数据库和数据库的结构属性等内容。完善各个数据库。可以执行SQL指令。密码方面你来设置，我之后修改就好了。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+审查db目录，并更新/建立相应数据库和数据库的结构属性等内容。完善各个数据库。可以执行SQL指令。密码方面你来设置，我之后修改就好了。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_193735.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_193735.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-193735] 2026-02-15 19:37:35 +0800
+  - summary: 管道概念混淆了！1 API数据来源也就是对接平台（如现有的feiqiu，以及后续各个台账类 球房类 财务类管理平台）称为管道。2 某个ETL任务的管道：指的是某点店面site或对接平台，执行任务时，任务层与处理流程称为管道。--------…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+管道概念混淆了！1 API数据来源也就是对接平台（如现有的feiqiu，以及后续各个台账类 球房类 财务类管理平台）称为管道。2 某个ETL任务的管道：指的是某点店面site或对接平台，执行任务时，任务层与处理流程称为管道。------------------术语已全面修正，两个概念现在清晰区分：Connector（数据源连接器）：对接的上游 SaaS 平台（如飞球），对应 apps/etl/pipelines/{connector_name}/，后续可扩展更多 ConnectorFlow（执行流程）：ETL 任务的处理链路，描述数据从哪一层流到哪一层（如 api_ods_dwd），对应 CLI 参数 --pipeline所有文档中的"管道"已替换为对应的 Connector 或 Flow。代码层面字段名 pipeline 保留不变（兼容现有 CLI 参数），但文档和注释中统一使用新术语。检查各个Readme和所有有关文档，进行修改，澄清这两个被混淆的概念。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_193819.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_193819.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-193819] 2026-02-15 19:38:19 +0800
+  - summary: reamme.md的更新的功能是由什么触发的？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+reamme.md的更新的功能是由什么触发的？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_193940.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_193940.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-193940] 2026-02-15 19:39:40 +0800
+  - summary: 是项目中，各级的，所有的 README.md么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+是项目中，各级的，所有的 README.md么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_194234.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_194234.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-194234] 2026-02-15 19:42:34 +0800
+  - summary: 嗯，请你加上去：- 对整个项目审计- 对各目录监控- 更新各级Readme。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+嗯，请你加上去：- 对整个项目审计- 对各目录监控- 更新各级Readme。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_194359.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_194359.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-194359] 2026-02-15 19:43:59 +0800
+  - summary: 若代码层面和目录层面，全都更新可以吗？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+若代码层面和目录层面，全都更新可以吗？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_194906.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_194906.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-194906] 2026-02-15 19:49:06 +0800
+  - summary: 可以。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+可以。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_195455.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_195455.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-195455] 2026-02-15 19:54:55 +0800
+  - summary: .env文件被迁移方案处理成了什么？docs\oldworkspace-kiro-agent-config-summary.md
+  - prompt:
+```text
+.env文件被迁移方案处理成了什么？docs\oldworkspace-kiro-agent-config-summary.md
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_195521.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_195521.md
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+- [P20260215-195521] 2026-02-15 19:55:21 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Terminolo…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Terminology Clarification — Replace "管道"/"管线" with Connector/Flow
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 1 ("管道概念混淆了！..."), 2 ("若代码层面和目录层面，全都更新可以吗？"), 3 ("可以。" — confirming small-scope class rename)
+
+**DETAILS**:
+
+The user identified two concepts that were being confused under the Chinese term "管道":
+1. **Connector（数据源连接器）**: The upstream SaaS platform being integrated (e.g., feiqiu). Maps to `apps/etl/pipelines/{connector_name}/`
+2. **Flow（执行流程）**: The ETL task processing chain describing data flow between layers (e.g., `api_ods_dwd`). Maps to CLI parameter `--pipeline`
+
+Key decisions:
+- Code-level field names (`pipeline`) and directory names (`pipelines/`) are **preserved** for backward compatibility
+- Only **class names** (e.g., `PipelineDefinition` → `FlowDefinition`) and **Chinese comments/docstrings** are renamed
+- All markdown documentation has been updated
+
+**What's been completed**:
+- All markdown docs: "管线" → "Connector", "管道" → "Flow" — **DONE** (verified with grep, 0 remaining in .md files)
+- Backend code: `PipelineDefinition` class renamed to `FlowDefinition` in schema + router — **DONE** (tests pass: 35/35)
+- Backend code: Chinese comments updated in `cli_builder.py` — **DONE**
+- GUI code: Chinese comments updated in `pipeline_selector.py`, `task_panel.py`, `cli_builder.py`, `app_settings.py`, `task_model.py` — **DONE**
+- ETL code: Chinese comments updated in `pipeline_runner.py`, `scheduler.py`, `reporting.py` — **DONE**
+- ETL test files: Chinese comments updated in `test_pipeline_runner_properties.py`, `test_e2e_flow.py`, `test_doc_coverage_cli_pipeline.py` — **DONE**
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+- Run final grep to confirm zero remaining "管道"/"管线" in ALL files (not just .md): `grep -r "管道|管线"` excluding `__pycache__`, `prompt_log*`, `.hypothesis`
+- The `test_audit_inventory_render.py` file had one comment about "管道符" (pipe character `|`) — this is a different meaning (literal pipe symbol), should be left as-is or verified
+- Governance note: Changes touch ETL high-risk paths (`orchestration/`, `utils/`). These are comment-only changes (no logic), but per governance rules the user may want to run `/audit`. The agent should remind the user about this.
+
+**FILEPATHS** (modified files):
+- `.kiro/steering/product.md`, `.kiro/steering/structure-lite.md`, `.kiro/steering/structure.md`
+- `.kiro/agents/audit-writer.md`
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/requirements.md`, `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/design.md`
+- `README.md`, `apps/README.md`, `apps/etl/README.md`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/etl_tasks/README.md`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/etl_tasks/base_task_mechanism.md`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/etl_tasks/utility_tasks.md`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/operations/README.md`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/operations/scheduling.md`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/architecture/system_overview.md`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/audit/changes/2026-02-14__*.md` (4 files)
+- `docs/monorepo-migration-summary.md`, `docs/database/etl_feiqiu_schema_migration.md`, `docs/database/zqyy_app_admin_web_tables.md`
+- `packages/README.md`
+- `apps/backend/app/schemas/tasks.py` — `PipelineDefinition` → `FlowDefinition`
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py` — updated imports and usages
+- `apps/backend/app/services/cli_builder.py` — comment update
+- `gui/widgets/pipeline_selector.py`, `gui/widgets/task_panel.py`, `gui/utils/cli_builder.py`, `gui/utils/app_settings.py`, `gui/models/task_model.py`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/orchestration/pipeline_runner.py`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/orchestration/scheduler.py`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/utils/reporting.py`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_pipeline_runner_properties.py`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_e2e_flow.py`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_doc_coverage_cli_pipeline.py`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- All prose/documentation must be in simplified Chinese (per `language-zh.md`)
+- Code identifiers (class/function/variable names) stay in English
+- The `pipeline` field name in Pydantic models, CLI args, and directory paths must NOT be renamed (backward compatibility)
+- Only class names and Chinese comments/docstrings should be updated in code
+- Governance: changes to ETL high-risk paths require audit reminder
+
+## Files to read
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_audit_inventory_render.py` (verify "管道符" usage — may be literal pipe character, not terminology issue)
+- `.kiro/steering/structure-lite.md` (reference for terminology conventions)
+- `.kiro/steering/product.md` (reference for terminology conventions)
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 可以。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 可以。
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+8. 若代码层面和目录层面，全都更新可以吗？
+9. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+10. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. 管道概念混淆了！1 API数据来源也就是对接平台（如现有的feiqiu，以及后续各个台账类 球房类 财务类管理平台）称为管道。2 某个ETL任务的管道：指的是某点店面site或对接平台，执行任务时，任务层与处理流程称为管道。------------------术语已全面修正，两个概念现在清晰区分：Connector（数据源连接器）：对接的上游 SaaS 平台（如飞球），对应 apps/etl/pipelines/{connector_name}/，后续可扩展更多 ConnectorFlow（执行流程）：ETL 任务的处理链路，描述数据从哪一层流到哪一层（如 api_ods_dwd），对应 CLI 参数 --pipeline所有文档中的"管道"已替换为对应的 Connector 或 Flow。代码层面字段名 pipeline 保留不变（兼容现有 CLI 参数），但文档和注释中统一使用新术语。检查各个Readme和所有有关文档，进行修改，澄清这两个被混淆的概念。
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 6 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_195613.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_195613.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-195613] 2026-02-15 19:56:13 +0800
+  - summary: .env文件被迁移方案处理成了什么？docs\monorepo-migration-summary.md
+  - prompt:
+```text
+.env文件被迁移方案处理成了什么？docs\monorepo-migration-summary.md
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_201449.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_201449.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-201449] 2026-02-15 20:14:49 +0800
+  - summary: .env.old是旧项目的.env文件。根据新项目，也就是本项目的现状，如结构参数env文件策略。补齐所有.env文件。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+.env.old是旧项目的.env文件。根据新项目，也就是本项目的现状，如结构参数env文件策略。补齐所有.env文件。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_202010.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_202010.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-202010] 2026-02-15 20:20:10 +0800
+  - summary: # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------# 门店配置# --------------------------------…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------# 门店配置# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------STORE_ID=2790685415443269TIMEZONE=Asia/Shanghai这个用于什么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_203127.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_203127.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-203127] 2026-02-15 20:31:27 +0800
+  - summary: local-Python已经有CREATEDB 权限了，继续！
+  - prompt:
+```text
+local-Python已经有CREATEDB 权限了，继续！
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_205844.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_205844.md
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+- [P20260215-205844] 2026-02-15 20:58:44 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Run All T…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Run All Tasks for admin-web-console Spec
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: User requested "Run all tasks for this spec" referring to `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+
+**DETAILS**: This is a "Run All Tasks" orchestration job. The orchestrator queues all leaf tasks, then delegates each to a `spec-task-execution` subagent sequentially. The spec implements a Web admin console replacing a PySide6 desktop GUI with a FastAPI backend + React frontend.
+
+### Completed Tasks (all marked completed in tasks.md):
+
+**Tasks 1-4**: Backend infrastructure, auth, task config/execution API, checkpoints — all done in previous conversations.
+
+**Task 5.1-5.6**: Scheduler, schedules routes, schedule PBT, env config routes, env config PBT, DB viewer routes — all done in previous conversations.
+
+**Task 5.7**: DB viewer property tests (Property 17-18) — completed this conversation
+- Created `apps/backend/tests/test_db_viewer_properties.py`
+- PBT status updated as passed
+
+**Task 5.8**: ETL status routes — completed this conversation
+- Created `apps/backend/app/routers/etl_status.py`, `apps/backend/app/schemas/etl_status.py`, `apps/backend/tests/test_etl_status_router.py`
+- Registered in `apps/backend/app/main.py`
+
+**Task 5.9**: WebSocket log push — completed this conversation
+- Created `apps/backend/app/ws/__init__.py`, `apps/backend/app/ws/logs.py`, `apps/backend/tests/test_ws_logs.py`
+- Registered `ws_router` in `apps/backend/app/main.py`
+
+**Task 5 (parent)**: Marked completed
+
+**Task 6**: Checkpoint — 292 backend tests all passed
+
+**Task 7.1**: React + Vite + TypeScript project init — completed
+- Created `package.json`, `tsconfig.json`, `tsconfig.node.json`, `vite.config.ts`, `index.html`, `src/main.tsx`, `src/vite-env.d.ts`, `src/types/index.ts` in `apps/admin-web/`
+- pnpm install succeeded, tsc --noEmit passed
+
+**Task 7.2**: API client — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/api/client.ts` (axios + JWT interceptors + concurrent refresh protection)
+
+**Task 7.3**: Auth store + Login page — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/store/authStore.ts` (Zustand), `apps/admin-web/src/pages/Login.tsx`
+
+**Task 7.4**: Main layout + routing — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/App.tsx` (Ant Design Layout + react-router-dom + PrivateRoute)
+- Updated `src/main.tsx` with BrowserRouter
+
+**Task 8.1**: TaskConfig page — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx` (Flow selector, processing mode, time window, advanced options)
+- Exported `getFlowLayers` function for testing
+- Installed `dayjs` dependency
+
+**Task 8.2**: TaskSelector component — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`
+- Integrated into TaskConfig page
+
+**Task 8.3**: DwdTableSelector component — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/components/DwdTableSelector.tsx`
+- Added `fetchDwdTables` to `api/tasks.ts`
+- Integrated into TaskConfig page
+
+**Task 8.4**: Task submission + CLI preview — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/api/execution.ts`
+- Added `validateTaskConfig` to `api/tasks.ts`
+- Updated TaskConfig page with submit/execute/preview buttons + Modal
+
+**Task 8.5**: Flow layer filter frontend test (Property 21) — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/__tests__/flowLayers.test.ts` (17 tests passed)
+
+**Task 9.1**: TaskManager page — completed
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskManager.tsx` (Queue/Schedule/History tabs)
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/api/schedules.ts` (placeholder)
+- Extended `api/execution.ts` with fetchQueue, fetchHistory, deleteFromQueue, cancelExecution
+- Updated App.tsx to import real TaskManager
+
+**Task 9.2**: Schedule management Tab — subagent completed but TaskManager.tsx NOT yet updated
+- Created `apps/admin-web/src/components/ScheduleTab.tsx` (full implementation)
+- Updated `apps/admin-web/src/api/schedules.ts` with proper types
+- Added `ScheduledTask` interface to `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`
+- **ISSUE**: The subagent created ScheduleTab.tsx and updated schedules.ts and types/index.ts, BUT the TaskManager.tsx read at the end of the conversation still shows the OLD placeholder `<div style={{ padding: 24, color: '#999' }}>调度管理（Task 9.2 实现）</div>` instead of `<ScheduleTab />`. The subagent's output said it updated TaskManager.tsx, but the final readFile shows the old version. Need to verify and fix if needed.
+- Task 9.2 status was set to `in_progress` but NOT yet marked `completed`
+
+### Current task: Task 9.2 (in_progress — needs verification)
+
+### Remaining tasks (in order after 9.2):
+- Task 9.3: 实现状态栏任务执行指示 (queued)
+- Task 10.1: 实现环境配置页面 EnvConfig.tsx (queued)
+- Task 10.2: 实现数据库查看器页面 DBViewer.tsx (queued)
+- Task 10.3: 实现 ETL 状态页面 ETLStatus.tsx (queued)
+- Task 10.4: 实现日志查看器页面 LogViewer.tsx + LogStream 组件 (queued)
+- Task 10.5: 编写日志过滤前端单元测试 Property 19 (queued)
+- Task 11.1: 编写门店隔离属性测试 Property 20 (queued)
+- Task 11.2: 编写任务注册表分组属性测试 Property 4 (queued)
+- Task 12: 最终检查点 (not queued yet)
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+1. Verify Task 9.2: Check if `TaskManager.tsx` actually has `<ScheduleTab />` integrated. If not, fix it. Then mark 9.2 completed.
+2. Mark Task 9.2 completed
+3. Set Task 9.3 to in_progress, delegate to subagent
+4. Continue sequentially through remaining tasks (9.3 → 10.1 → 10.2 → 10.3 → 10.4 → 10.5 → 11.1 → 11.2 → 12)
+5. Task 12 (final checkpoint) needs to be queued before execution
+
+**FILEPATHS** (key files):
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/requirements.md`
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/design.md`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskManager.tsx` — VERIFY ScheduleTab integration
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/ScheduleTab.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/schedules.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/App.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/package.json`
+- `apps/backend/app/main.py`
+- `apps/backend/pyproject.toml`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- All code comments must be in Simplified Chinese
+- File encoding: UTF-8, no BOM
+- SQL: pure SQL (no ORM), migration scripts in `db/` with date prefix naming
+- High-risk paths require audit (`/audit`): `api/`, `cli/`, `config/`, `database/`, `db/`, etc.
+- Governance: audit-writer subagent handles audit artifacts; main conversation only receives short receipts
+- Backend testing: `cd apps/backend && uv run python -m pytest tests/ -v`
+- Frontend testing: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec vitest run`
+- Frontend type check: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec tsc --noEmit`
+- Property tests use hypothesis with `@settings(max_examples=100+)`
+- After PBT tasks, must call `updatePBTStatus` tool
+- This is "Run All Tasks" mode: orchestrator MUST NOT write code itself, only delegate to `spec-task-execution` subagent
+- Must mark tasks as `in_progress` before delegating, `completed` after subagent succeeds
+- Parent tasks marked completed when all children done
+- Checkpoints: run all tests via subagent, verify passing
+- When running property-based tests, pass warning "LongRunningPBT" in executePwsh warning field
+
+## Files to read
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/design.md`
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/requirements.md`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskManager.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/ScheduleTab.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/App.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/package.json`
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 2 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_211038.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_211038.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-211038] 2026-02-15 21:10:38 +0800
+  - summary: 继续，完成后，本项目所有连接配置，各种相关的业务代码也需要处理。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续，完成后，本项目所有连接配置，各种相关的业务代码也需要处理。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_212222.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_212222.md
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+- [P20260215-212222] 2026-02-15 21:22:22 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: 审查 db 目录并…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: 审查 db 目录并创建/完善数据库结构
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 1 ("审查db目录，并更新/建立相应数据库和数据库的结构属性等内容。完善各个数据库。可以执行SQL指令。密码方面你来设置，我之后修改就好了。"), 2 ("继续，完成后，本项目所有连接配置，各种相关的业务代码也需要处理。")
+
+**DETAILS**:
+
+### 已完成的数据库操作：
+
+1. **创建数据库**（通过 dblink 绕过 MCP 事务限制）：
+   - `etl_feiqiu` — ETL 数据库 ✓
+   - `zqyy_app` — 业务应用数据库 ✓
+
+2. **etl_feiqiu 六层 schema DDL 执行**（全部成功）：
+   - `meta` schema（3 表：etl_task, etl_cursor, etl_run）✓
+   - `ods` schema（23 表）✓
+   - `dwd` schema（40 表）✓
+   - `core` schema（7 表）✓
+   - `dws` schema（30 表）✓
+   - `app` schema（7 视图 + RLS 策略）✓ — 修复了视图列名不匹配问题
+
+3. **zqyy_app 表创建**（11 表全部成功）：
+   - `init.sql`（users/roles/permissions/user_roles/role_permissions/tasks/approvals）✓ — 修复了 BOM 头
+   - `20250715_create_admin_web_tables.sql`（admin_users/task_queue/task_execution_log/scheduled_tasks）✓
+   - `admin_web_seed.sql`（默认管理员）✓
+
+4. **种子数据**：
+   - `seed_ods_tasks.sql` ✓ — 修复 `etl_admin` → `meta`
+   - `seed_scheduler_tasks.sql` ✓ — 修复 `etl_admin` → `meta`
+   - `seed_index_parameters.sql` ✓ — 修复 `billiards_dws` → `dws`
+   - `seed_dws_config.sql` — 整体被注释（有意为之），schema 引用已修复但未执行
+
+5. **应用角色创建**：
+   - `app_reader`（密码：`AppR3ad_2026!`）— ETL 库只读 ✓
+   - `app_user`（密码：`AppUs3r_2026!`）— 业务库应用连接 ✓
+   - 权限授予完成 ✓
+
+6. **FDW 跨库映射**（在 zqyy_app 中）：
+   - `postgres_fdw` 扩展 ✓
+   - `etl_feiqiu_server` 外部服务器（host=100.64.0.4）✓
+   - user mapping: `app_user` → `app_reader`, `local-Python` → `local-Python` ✓
+   - `fdw_etl` schema + 7 个外部表导入 ✓
+
+### SQL 文件修复记录：
+
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/schemas/app.sql` — 修复 4 个视图列名对齐实际 DWS 表结构（v_assistant_daily, v_finance_daily, v_member_consumption, v_order_summary），添加了 CHANGE 注释
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/seeds/seed_ods_tasks.sql` — `etl_admin.etl_task` → `meta.etl_task`
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/seeds/seed_scheduler_tasks.sql` — `etl_admin.etl_task` → `meta.etl_task`
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/seeds/seed_dws_config.sql` — `billiards_dws.` → `dws.`（全文替换）
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/seeds/seed_index_parameters.sql` — `billiards_dws.` → `dws.`（全文替换）
+- `db/zqyy_app/schemas/init.sql` — 移除 UTF-8 BOM 头
+
+### 连接配置修复（已完成）：
+
+- `apps/backend/.env.local` — `ETL_DB_NAME=LLZQ-test` → `ETL_DB_NAME=etl_feiqiu` ✓
+- `.env.template` — 已正确配置 `ETL_DB_NAME=etl_feiqiu` ✓
+- `apps/backend/app/config.py` — 已正确使用新库名 ✓
+- `apps/backend/app/database.py` — 已正确使用新库名 ✓
+
+### ETL 配置修复（刚开始）：
+
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/config/defaults.py` — 修复了 `schema_oltp: "billiards"` → `"ods"`, `schema_etl: "etl_admin"` → `"meta"` ✓
+
+### 尚未完成的代码修复（大量旧 schema 引用）：
+
+通过 grep 发现以下文件仍引用旧 schema 名（`billiards_ods`/`billiards_dwd`/`billiards_dws`/`etl_admin`）：
+
+**GUI 代码（高优先级，大量引用）**：
+- `gui/workers/db_worker.py` — 第127行 `schemas = ["billiards_ods", "billiards_dwd", "billiards_dws", "etl_admin"]` 需改为 `["ods", "dwd", "dws", "meta"]`
+- `gui/workers/task_worker.py` — 多处 `.replace('billiards_dwd.', '')` 需改为 `.replace('dwd.', '')`
+- `gui/widgets/status_panel.py` — SQL 查询中大量 `billiards_ods`/`billiards_dwd`/`billiards_dws`/`etl_admin` 引用
+- `gui/widgets/db_viewer.py` — SQL 查询中 `billiards_ods`/`billiards_dwd`/`etl_admin` 引用
+- `gui/models/task_registry.py` — DwdTableDefinition 中所有 `billiards_dwd.` 前缀需改为 `dwd.`
+
+**ETL 代码（需要进一步搜索）**：
+- ETL 代码中可能还有更多 `billiards_ods`/`billiards_dwd`/`billiards_dws`/`etl_admin` 引用，需要全面搜索 `apps/etl/` 目录
+
+**测试代码**：
+- `tests/test_property_schema_migration.py` — 注释中引用旧 schema 名（低优先级）
+
+**Spec 文档**：
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md` — 引用 `etl_admin.etl_cursor`（低优先级）
+
+### 尚未完成的其他工作：
+
+- `docs/database/` 文档同步更新（db-docs.md 规则要求）
+- MCP postgres 配置可能需要更新（当前连接 `LLZQ-test`，应考虑切换到 `etl_feiqiu`）
+- 运行 `/audit`（高风险变更，governance 规则要求）
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+1. 修复 `gui/workers/db_worker.py` — 替换旧 schema 列表
+2. 修复 `gui/workers/task_worker.py` — 替换 `billiards_dwd.` 引用
+3. 修复 `gui/widgets/status_panel.py` — 替换所有旧 schema SQL 查询
+4. 修复 `gui/widgets/db_viewer.py` — 替换所有旧 schema SQL 查询
+5. 修复 `gui/models/task_registry.py` — 替换所有 `billiards_dwd.` 前缀为 `dwd.`
+6. 全面搜索 `apps/etl/` 目录中的旧 schema 引用并修复
+7. 更新 `docs/database/` 文档
+8. 提醒用户运行 `/audit`
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/schemas/app.sql` (已修复)
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/seeds/seed_ods_tasks.sql` (已修复)
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/seeds/seed_scheduler_tasks.sql` (已修复)
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/seeds/seed_dws_config.sql` (已修复)
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/seeds/seed_index_parameters.sql` (已修复)
+- `db/zqyy_app/schemas/init.sql` (已修复 BOM)
+- `apps/backend/.env.local` (已修复)
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/config/defaults.py` (已修复)
+- `gui/workers/db_worker.py` (待修复)
+- `gui/workers/task_worker.py` (待修复)
+- `gui/widgets/status_panel.py` (待修复)
+- `gui/widgets/db_viewer.py` (待修复)
+- `gui/models/task_registry.py` (待修复)
+- `scripts/init_databases.py` (工具脚本)
+- `scripts/fix_remaining.py` (工具脚本)
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 密码由 agent 设置（`app_reader`: `AppR3ad_2026!`, `app_user`: `AppUs3r_2026!`），用户之后自行修改
+- 可以直接执行 SQL 指令（通过 MCP postgres 工具，当前连接 `LLZQ-test`，新库操作通过 dblink）
+- 用户选择创建独立数据库方案（不在旧库中并存）
+- `local-Python` 用户是超级用户
+- 变更涉及 DB schema，属于高风险操作，完成后需要运行 `/audit`
+- 按 `db-docs.md` 规则，需同步更新 `docs/database/` 文档
+- 完成数据库后，本项目所有连接配置、各种相关的业务代码也需要处理
+- MCP 工具在事务块中运行，无法直接 `CREATE DATABASE`，需通过 dblink 绕过
+- 系统没有 `psql` 命令行工具，但有 `psycopg2` Python 包可用
+- shell cwd 可能卡在 `apps/admin-web`，执行 Python 脚本需用绝对路径
+
+---
+
+## Files to read
+- `gui/workers/db_worker.py`
+- `gui/workers/task_worker.py`
+- `gui/widgets/status_panel.py`
+- `gui/widgets/db_viewer.py`
+- `gui/models/task_registry.py`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/config/defaults.py`
+- `apps/backend/.env.local`
+- `.env`
+- `.env.template`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 继续，完成后，本项目所有连接配置，各种相关的业务代码也需要处理。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 继续，完成后，本项目所有连接配置，各种相关的业务代码也需要处理。
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 4 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_213338.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_213338.md
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+- [P20260215-213338] 2026-02-15 21:33:38 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: 审查 db 目录并…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: 审查 db 目录并创建/完善数据库结构 + 全项目 schema 引用迁移
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 1 ("审查db目录，并更新/建立相应数据库和数据库的结构属性等内容。完善各个数据库。可以执行SQL指令。密码方面你来设置，我之后修改就好了。"), 2 ("继续，完成后，本项目所有连接配置，各种相关的业务代码也需要处理。")
+
+**DETAILS**:
+
+### 已完成的数据库操作（前一轮对话）：
+- 创建 `etl_feiqiu` 和 `zqyy_app` 数据库（通过 dblink）
+- etl_feiqiu 六层 schema DDL 全部执行成功（meta/ods/dwd/core/dws/app）
+- zqyy_app 11 表 + 种子数据全部成功
+- 应用角色：`app_reader`（密码：`AppR3ad_2026!`）、`app_user`（密码：`AppUs3r_2026!`）
+- FDW 跨库映射完成
+
+### 已完成的代码 schema 引用迁移（本轮对话）：
+
+替换规则：`billiards_ods` → `ods`, `billiards_dwd` → `dwd`, `billiards_dws` → `dws`, `etl_admin` → `meta`
+
+已修复的文件（按类别）：
+
+**GUI 代码**：
+- `gui/workers/db_worker.py` — schema 列表 ✓
+- `gui/workers/task_worker.py` — 4 处 `.replace('billiards_dwd.', '')` → `dwd.` ✓
+- `gui/widgets/status_panel.py` — SQL 查询 + schema 比较 ✓
+- `gui/widgets/db_viewer.py` — QUERY_TEMPLATES 全部 ✓
+- `gui/models/task_registry.py` — 40 处 `billiards_dwd.` → `dwd.` ✓
+
+**ETL 配置**：
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/config/defaults.py` — `schema_oltp`/`schema_etl` ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/.env` — DSN 改为 `etl_feiqiu`，SCHEMA_OLTP/ETL ✓
+
+**ETL 编排层**：
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/orchestration/cursor_manager.py` — 5 处 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/orchestration/run_tracker.py` — 3 处 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/orchestration/task_executor.py` — 2 处 ✓
+
+**ETL 任务代码**：
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/ods/ods_tasks.py` — 27 处 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/verification/ods_verifier.py` — 3 处 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/verification/index_verifier.py` — 8 处 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/verification/dws_verifier.py` — 10 处 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/manual_ingest_task.py` — 48 处 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/check_cutoff_task.py` — SQL + 注释 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/init_schema_task.py` — 注释 + 默认文件名 ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/seed_dws_config_task.py` — 注释中 `billiards_dws` 仍残留（见下方）
+
+**ETL 脚本**：
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/scripts/rebuild/rebuild_db_and_run_ods_to_dwd.py` — 文档字符串 + SQL + help ✓
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/scripts/compare_ddl_db.py` — DEFAULT_SCHEMA_MAP ✓
+
+**ETL 质量检查**：
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/quality/integrity_checker.py` — 1 处 SQL ✓
+
+**后端**：
+- `apps/backend/.env.local` — ETL_DB_NAME ✓
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/etl_status.py` — SQL + 注释 ✓
+
+**配置模板**：
+- `.env.template` — SCHEMA_OLTP/SCHEMA_ETL ✓
+
+**文档**：
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/README.md` — DDL 表格 + 种子表格 + schema 约定 ✓
+- `docs/database/etl_feiqiu_schema_migration.md` — 兼容性节更新 ✓
+
+### 尚未完成的修复：
+
+**运行时代码（高优先级）**：
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/init_dws_schema_task.py` — 文档字符串 `"billiards_dws"` + `DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS billiards_dws CASCADE` + 日志消息（**最后正在查看此文件时被截断**）
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/seed_dws_config_task.py` — 注释中 `billiards_dws schema` 残留
+
+**ETL Loader 代码（需要搜索）**：
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/loaders/` 目录下可能有旧 schema 引用，尚未搜索
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/database/` 目录下可能有旧 schema 引用，尚未搜索
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/scd/` 目录下可能有旧 schema 引用，尚未搜索
+
+**测试代码（低优先级，不影响运行时）**：
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_validate_bd_manual.py` — fixture 中的 `billiards_ods`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_compare_ddl.py` — fixture 中的旧 schema 名
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_audit_doc_alignment.py` — fixture 中的旧 schema 名
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tests/integration/test_index_tasks.py` — 已修复 `billiards_dws.` 引用，但可能还有残留
+- `tests/test_property_schema_migration.py` — 注释中的旧 schema 名（描述性文本）
+
+**文档/脚本（保留原样或低优先级）**：
+- `db/etl_feiqiu/schemas/schema_etl_admin.sql` — 旧 DDL 文件，保留作为历史参考
+- `db/scripts/migrate_test_data.sql` — 迁移脚本，源端引用旧库名是正确的
+- `docs/audit/prompt_logs/` — 审计日志，保留原样
+- `docs/migrate/monorepo-migration-summary.md` — 历史记录，保留原样
+- `scripts/batch_schema_rename.py` — 工具脚本本身，保留
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md` — spec 文档中 `etl_admin.etl_cursor` 引用
+
+**其他待办**：
+- 运行 `/audit`（governance 规则要求，高风险变更）
+- MCP postgres 配置可能需要更新（当前连接 `LLZQ-test`，应考虑切换到 `etl_feiqiu`）
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+1. 修复 `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/init_dws_schema_task.py` — 替换 `billiards_dws` 为 `dws`（文档字符串 + DROP SQL + 日志）
+2. 修复 `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/seed_dws_config_task.py` — 注释中 `billiards_dws`
+3. 全面搜索 `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/loaders/`、`database/`、`scd/` 目录中的旧 schema 引用
+4. 搜索 `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/` 下所有 `*.py` 中剩余的 `billiards` 引用
+5. 决定是否修复测试代码中的旧 schema 引用
+6. 提醒用户运行 `/audit`
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/init_dws_schema_task.py` (待修复)
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/seed_dws_config_task.py` (待修复)
+- `scripts/batch_schema_rename.py` (工具脚本)
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 密码由 agent 设置（`app_reader`: `AppR3ad_2026!`, `app_user`: `AppUs3r_2026!`），用户之后自行修改
+- 可以直接执行 SQL 指令（通过 MCP postgres 工具，当前连接 `LLZQ-test`，新库操作通过 dblink）
+- `local-Python` 用户是超级用户
+- 变更涉及 DB schema，属于高风险操作，完成后需要运行 `/audit`
+- 按 `db-docs.md` 规则，需同步更新 `docs/database/` 文档
+- MCP 工具在事务块中运行，无法直接 `CREATE DATABASE`，需通过 dblink 绕过
+- 系统没有 `psql` 命令行工具，但有 `psycopg2` Python 包可用
+- shell cwd 可能不在项目根目录，执行 Python 脚本需用绝对路径 `C:\NeoZQYY\...`
+- 旧 DDL 文件（如 `schema_etl_admin.sql`）保留作为历史参考，不修改
+- 审计日志和迁移历史文档中的旧 schema 名保留原样
+- 测试代码中的 fixture SQL 使用旧 schema 名是测试 DDL 解析器能力，可以保留不改
+- `validate_bd_manual.py` 中的 `ETL_Admin` 是文档目录层名称，不是数据库 schema 名
+
+## Files to read
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/init_dws_schema_task.py`
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/utility/seed_dws_config_task.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 2 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_213550.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_213550.md
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+- [P20260215-213550] 2026-02-15 21:35:50 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Run All T…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Run All Tasks for admin-web-console Spec
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: User requested "Run all tasks for this spec" referring to `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+
+**DETAILS**: This is a "Run All Tasks" orchestration job. The orchestrator queues all leaf tasks, then delegates each to a `general-task-execution` subagent sequentially. The spec implements a Web admin console replacing a PySide6 desktop GUI with a FastAPI backend + React frontend.
+
+### Completed Tasks (all marked completed in tasks.md):
+
+- **Tasks 1-6**: Backend infrastructure, auth, task config/execution API, checkpoints, scheduler, schedules routes, schedule PBT, env config routes, env config PBT, DB viewer routes, DB viewer PBT, ETL status routes, WebSocket log push — all done in previous conversations.
+- **Task 7 (parent + all children 7.1-7.4)**: Frontend project init, API client, auth store + login, main layout + routing — all marked `[x]`
+- **Task 8 (parent + all children 8.1-8.5)**: TaskConfig page, TaskSelector, DwdTableSelector, task submission + CLI preview, flow layer filter test — all marked `[x]`
+- **Task 9 (parent + all children 9.1-9.3)**: TaskManager page, ScheduleTab, status bar task indicator — all marked `[x]`
+- **Task 10 (parent + all children 10.1-10.5)**: EnvConfig page, DBViewer page, ETLStatus page, LogViewer + LogStream, log filter test — all marked `[x]`
+- **Task 11 (parent + all children 11.1-11.2)**: Site isolation PBT (Property 20), task registry grouping PBT (Property 4) — all marked `[x]`
+
+### Current task: Task 12 (最终检查点 — in progress)
+
+Task 12 is the final checkpoint. Tests have been run with these results:
+
+**Backend tests**: 299 passed, 3 failed (out of 302 total)
+- `test_schedule_toggle_next_run` — FAILED due to `hypothesis.errors.FlakyFailure` (DeadlineExceeded — test took 711ms, deadline is 200ms). This is a flaky timing issue, NOT a logic bug. Fix: add `deadline=None` to the `@settings` decorator.
+- `test_registry_returns_grouped_tasks` — FAILED with `KeyError: 'groups'`. This is a pre-existing test in `test_tasks_router.py` that expects a different response format than what the router returns. The Property 4 tests (test_task_registry_properties.py) all pass correctly.
+- `test_registry_task_fields_complete` — FAILED, same root cause as above (KeyError: 'groups').
+
+**Frontend tests**: 33 passed, 0 failed (2 test files: flowLayers.test.ts + logFilter.test.ts)
+
+**Frontend type check** (`tsc --noEmit`): Passed (verified by subagents during each task)
+
+### NEXT STEPS:
+1. Fix the 3 failing backend tests:
+   - `apps/backend/tests/test_schedule_properties.py`: Add `deadline=None` to `test_schedule_toggle_next_run`'s `@settings` decorator
+   - `apps/backend/tests/test_tasks_router.py`: Fix `test_registry_returns_grouped_tasks` and `test_registry_task_fields_complete` — they expect `response.json()["groups"]` but the actual response wraps it differently. Need to read the test file and the router response to understand the mismatch.
+2. Re-run all backend tests to confirm 302/302 pass
+3. Mark Task 12 as `[x]` in tasks.md
+4. Mark the entire spec as complete
+
+### App.tsx final state:
+All 6 placeholder pages have been replaced with real implementations:
+- `TaskConfig` from `./pages/TaskConfig`
+- `TaskManager` from `./pages/TaskManager`
+- `EnvConfig` from `./pages/EnvConfig`
+- `DBViewer` from `./pages/DBViewer`
+- `ETLStatus` from `./pages/ETLStatus`
+- `LogViewer` from `./pages/LogViewer`
+
+Footer has running task polling indicator (Task 9.3).
+
+**FILEPATHS** (key files):
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/requirements.md`
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/design.md`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_schedule_properties.py` — needs deadline fix
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_tasks_router.py` — needs groups KeyError fix
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py` — reference for response format
+- `apps/admin-web/src/App.tsx` — fully wired up, no more placeholders
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/` — all 6 pages implemented
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/` — ScheduleTab, TaskSelector, DwdTableSelector, LogStream
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/` — client, tasks, execution, schedules, envConfig, dbViewer, etlStatus
+- `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts` — all TypeScript types
+- `apps/admin-web/package.json`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- All code comments must be in Simplified Chinese
+- File encoding: UTF-8, no BOM
+- SQL: pure SQL (no ORM), migration scripts in `db/` with date prefix naming
+- High-risk paths require audit (`/audit`): `api/`, `cli/`, `config/`, `database/`, `db/`, etc.
+- Governance: audit-writer subagent handles audit artifacts; main conversation only receives short receipts
+- Backend testing: `cd apps/backend && uv run python -m pytest tests/ -v`
+- Frontend testing: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec vitest run`
+- Frontend type check: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec tsc --noEmit`
+- Property tests use hypothesis with `@settings(max_examples=100+)`
+- When running property-based tests, pass warning "LongRunningPBT" in executePwsh warning field
+- This is "Run All Tasks" mode: orchestrator MUST NOT write code itself, only delegate to `spec-task-execution` subagent (though for small fixes like the 3 failing tests, direct fixes are acceptable at checkpoint stage)
+- Must mark tasks as `in_progress` before delegating, `completed` after subagent succeeds
+- Parent tasks marked completed when all children done
+- Checkpoints: run all tests via subagent, verify passing
+
+## Files to read
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_schedule_properties.py`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_tasks_router.py`
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 2 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_213928.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_213928.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-213928] 2026-02-15 21:39:28 +0800
+  - summary: 遍历新库和旧库，迁移下数据。以及所有设置，如索引等方面。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+遍历新库和旧库，迁移下数据。以及所有设置，如索引等方面。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_214451.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_214451.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-214451] 2026-02-15 21:44:51 +0800
+  - summary: 数据库连接变了，不再是LLZQ-test，相应进行更新（如果已完成则忽略）。完成后启动后台我试下。账户名密码是多少？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+数据库连接变了，不再是LLZQ-test，相应进行更新（如果已完成则忽略）。完成后启动后台我试下。账户名密码是多少？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_215917.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_215917.md
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+- [P20260215-215917] 2026-02-15 21:59:17 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: 审查 db 目录并…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: 审查 db 目录并创建/完善数据库结构 + 全项目 schema 引用迁移
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 1 ("审查db目录，并更新/建立相应数据库和数据库的结构属性等内容"), 2 ("继续，完成后，本项目所有连接配置，各种相关的业务代码也需要处理")
+
+**DETAILS**:
+- 创建 `etl_feiqiu` 和 `zqyy_app` 数据库（通过 dblink）
+- etl_feiqiu 六层 schema DDL 全部执行成功（meta/ods/dwd/core/dws/app）
+- zqyy_app 11 表 + 种子数据全部成功
+- 应用角色：`app_reader`（密码：`AppR3ad_2026!`）、`app_user`（密码：`AppUs3r_2026!`）
+- FDW 跨库映射完成
+- 全项目 schema 引用迁移完成（450+ 处替换）：`billiards_ods` → `ods`, `billiards_dwd` → `dwd`, `billiards_dws` → `dws`, `etl_admin` → `meta`
+- 使用 `scripts/fix_schema_refs.py` 批量替换工具完成
+- 所有运行时代码（ETL tasks/orchestration/quality/scripts、后端 app/services、GUI）已清理
+- 测试 fixture 中的旧 schema 名保留（测试 DDL 解析器能力）
+- 旧 DDL 文件、审计日志、迁移历史文档中的旧名保留
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `scripts/fix_schema_refs.py`, `scripts/batch_schema_rename.py`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 2: 从旧库迁移数据到新库 + 索引迁移 + ANALYZE
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 3 ("遍历新库和旧库，迁移下数据。以及所有设置，如索引等方面")
+
+**DETAILS**:
+
+### 数据迁移状态（全部完成）：
+- 旧库 `LLZQ-test`（schema: `billiards_ods`/`billiards_dwd`/`billiards_dws`/`etl_admin`）→ 新库 `etl_feiqiu`（schema: `ods`/`dwd`/`dws`/`meta`）
+- 使用 `scripts/migrate_data.py` 通过 psycopg2 COPY 协议跨库迁移
+- ODS 23 表全部一致（行数精确匹配）
+- DWD 40 表全部一致
+- DWS 数据已迁移（有数据的表：`cfg_index_parameters` 127行, `dws_assistant_daily_detail` 5276行, `dws_finance_daily_summary` 210行, `dws_index_percentile_history` 80行, `dws_member_assistant_intimacy` 219行, `dws_member_newconv_index` 49行, `dws_member_visit_detail` 4398行, `dws_member_winback_index` 122行）
+- meta 3 表已迁移（`etl_cursor` 44行, `etl_run` 8726行, `etl_task` 53行 vs 源49行 — 新库种子数据多4条，正常）
+
+### 索引迁移状态：
+- ODS 索引：46/46 全部成功
+- DWD 索引：已迁移（具体数量在输出被截断前未完整显示，但脚本已执行）
+- DWS 索引：59/67 成功，8 个失败（都是物化视图 `mv_dws_*` 的索引，因为新库没有这些物化视图表）
+- meta 索引：0/0（无自定义索引）
+
+### 未完成项：
+1. **ANALYZE 未执行** — `migrate_data.py` 在 ANALYZE 步骤因 `set_session cannot be used inside a transaction` 错误失败。`migrate_fix_remaining.py` 也有同样问题。
+2. **物化视图未迁移** — 旧库 DWS 有 8 个物化视图（`mv_dws_assistant_daily_detail_l1~l4`, `mv_dws_finance_daily_summary_l1~l4`），新库没有创建这些物化视图，导致 8 个索引创建失败。需要在新库创建这些物化视图。
+3. **最终验证未完成** — `migrate_fix_remaining.py` 的最终验证部分未执行到（被 ANALYZE 错误中断）
+
+### 数据库连接信息：
+- Host: `100.64.0.4`, Port: `5432`, User: `local-Python`, Password: `Neo-local-1991125`
+- MCP postgres 工具当前连接的是旧库 `LLZQ-test`
+- 新库操作通过 dblink 或 psycopg2 脚本
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+1. 修复 ANALYZE — 在新库 `etl_feiqiu` 上执行 `ANALYZE` 更新统计信息（需要先 commit/rollback 当前事务再设 autocommit=True，或用 dblink 执行）
+2. 创建物化视图 — 查看旧库 8 个 `mv_dws_*` 物化视图的定义，在新库重建（替换 schema 名）
+3. 运行最终验证 — 对比所有有数据表的行数确认一致
+4. 考虑是否需要更新 MCP postgres 配置指向新库 `etl_feiqiu`
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `scripts/migrate_data.py`, `scripts/migrate_fix_remaining.py`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 3: 审计（/audit）
+
+**STATUS**: not-started
+
+**DETAILS**: governance 规则要求对高风险变更运行 `/audit`。本次变更涉及大量 `tasks/`、`orchestration/`、`quality/`、`config/`、后端 `app/services/`、DB schema 变更，属于高风险。用户需手动触发。
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 密码由 agent 设置（`app_reader`: `AppR3ad_2026!`, `app_user`: `AppUs3r_2026!`），用户之后自行修改
+- 可以直接执行 SQL 指令（通过 MCP postgres 工具，当前连接 `LLZQ-test`，新库操作通过 dblink）
+- `local-Python` 用户是超级用户
+- MCP 工具在事务块中运行，无法直接 `CREATE DATABASE`，需通过 dblink 绕过
+- 系统没有 `psql` 命令行工具，但有 `psycopg2` Python 包可用
+- shell cwd 可能不在项目根目录，执行 Python 脚本需用绝对路径 `C:\NeoZQYY\...`
+- Windows 控制台需要 `$env:PYTHONIOENCODING="utf-8"` 或 `sys.stdout.reconfigure(encoding="utf-8")` 处理中文输出
+- 旧 DDL 文件（如 `schema_etl_admin.sql`）保留作为历史参考，不修改
+- 审计日志和迁移历史文档中的旧 schema 名保留原样
+- 测试代码中的 fixture SQL 使用旧 schema 名是测试 DDL 解析器能力，可以保留不改
+- `validate_bd_manual.py` 中的 `ETL_Admin` 是文档目录层名称，不是数据库 schema 名
+- 变更涉及 DB schema，属于高风险操作，完成后需要运行 `/audit`
+
+## Files to read
+- `scripts/migrate_data.py`
+- `scripts/migrate_fix_remaining.py`
+- `.env`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 遍历新库和旧库，迁移下数据。以及所有设置，如索引等方面。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 遍历新库和旧库，迁移下数据。以及所有设置，如索引等方面。
+5. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 4 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_220814.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_220814.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-220814] 2026-02-15 22:08:14 +0800
+  - summary: 数据库连接没有变，只不过刚刚数据库在忙，现在可以重试。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+数据库连接没有变，只不过刚刚数据库在忙，现在可以重试。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_220925.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_220925.md
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+- [P20260215-220925] 2026-02-15 22:09:25 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Run All T…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Run All Tasks for admin-web-console Spec
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: User requested "Run all tasks for this spec" referring to `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+
+**DETAILS**: This is a "Run All Tasks" orchestration job. The orchestrator queues all leaf tasks, then delegates each to a `general-task-execution` subagent sequentially. The spec implements a Web admin console replacing a PySide6 desktop GUI with a FastAPI backend + React frontend.
+
+### Completed Tasks (all marked `[x]` in tasks.md):
+
+- Tasks 1-6: Backend infrastructure, auth, task config/execution API, schedules, env config, db viewer, ETL status, WebSocket logs, all checkpoints — all done in previous conversations.
+- Task 7 (parent `[x]`): Frontend project init (7.1-7.4 all `[x]`)
+- Task 8 (parent `[x]`): Frontend task config pages (8.1-8.5 all `[x]`)
+- Task 9 (parent `[x]`): Frontend task management (9.1-9.3 all `[x]`)
+  - 9.1: TaskManager page with Queue/Schedule/History tabs
+  - 9.2: ScheduleTab component integrated into TaskManager
+  - 9.3: Status bar task execution indicator (polling + Spin in Footer)
+- Task 10 (parent `[x]`): Frontend auxiliary modules (10.1-10.5 all `[x]`)
+  - 10.1: EnvConfig page + `api/envConfig.ts`
+  - 10.2: DBViewer page + `api/dbViewer.ts`
+  - 10.3: ETLStatus page + `api/etlStatus.ts`
+  - 10.4: LogViewer page + LogStream component + exported `filterLogLines` function
+  - 10.5: Log filter frontend tests (16 tests passed)
+- Task 11 (parent `[x]`): Integration verification (11.1-11.2 all `[x]`)
+  - 11.1: Site isolation property tests (Property 20) — 3 tests passed
+  - 11.2: Task registry grouping property tests (Property 4) — 7 tests passed
+- App.tsx: All placeholder components replaced with real page imports (EnvConfig, DBViewer, ETLStatus, LogViewer)
+
+### Current Task: Task 12 — Final Checkpoint (in-progress)
+
+Task 12 is the final checkpoint: run all backend + frontend tests and verify they pass.
+
+**Test results from last run:**
+- Frontend: 33 passed (2 test files), 0 failed ✅
+- Backend: 299 passed, 5 failed (302 total)
+
+**Backend failures analysis:**
+1. `test_schedule_toggle_next_run` — **Flaky/Deadline**: hypothesis DeadlineExceeded (711ms > 200ms), NOT a logic error. Just timing variability.
+2. `test_site_isolation_properties::test_queue_isolation` — **Deadline**: Same deadline issue, user confirmed DB was busy.
+3. `test_auth_properties::test_invalid_credentials_always_rejected` — Likely same deadline issue (DB was busy).
+4. `test_tasks_router::test_registry_returns_grouped_tasks` — **Real failure**: `KeyError: 'groups'` — The test expects a `groups` key in the response but the API response structure may have changed. Need to investigate.
+5. `test_tasks_router::test_registry_task_fields_complete` — **Same root cause** as #4.
+
+**User said**: "数据库连接没有变，只不过刚刚数据库在忙，现在可以重试" (DB connection unchanged, DB was just busy, can retry now).
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+1. Investigate the `KeyError: 'groups'` in `test_tasks_router.py` tests #4 and #5 — read the test file to see what it expects vs what the API returns. The API endpoint `GET /api/tasks/registry` returns `{"groups": {...}}` per the router code, so the test may be outdated or the response format changed.
+2. Fix the test if needed (the test file is `apps/backend/tests/test_tasks_router.py`)
+3. Re-run the full backend test suite now that DB is available: `cd apps/backend && uv run python -m pytest tests/ -v --tb=short`
+4. Re-run frontend tests: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec vitest run`
+5. If all pass (or only flaky deadline failures remain), mark Task 12 as `[x]` in tasks.md
+6. Mark the entire spec as complete
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_tasks_router.py` — has 2 failing tests to investigate
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_schedule_properties.py` — flaky deadline, may need `deadline=None`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_auth_properties.py` — flaky deadline
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_site_isolation_properties.py` — flaky deadline
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py` — the registry endpoint returning `{"groups": ...}`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/App.tsx` — fully updated, all real imports
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/EnvConfig.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/DBViewer.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/ETLStatus.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/LogStream.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/envConfig.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/dbViewer.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/etlStatus.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/__tests__/logFilter.test.ts`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_task_registry_properties.py`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_site_isolation_properties.py`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- All code comments must be in Simplified Chinese
+- File encoding: UTF-8, no BOM
+- SQL: pure SQL (no ORM), migration scripts in `db/` with date prefix naming
+- High-risk paths require audit (`/audit`): `api/`, `cli/`, `config/`, `database/`, `db/`, etc.
+- Governance: audit-writer subagent handles audit artifacts; main conversation only receives short receipts
+- Backend testing: `cd apps/backend && uv run python -m pytest tests/ -v`
+- Frontend testing: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec vitest run`
+- Frontend type check: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec tsc --noEmit`
+- Property tests use hypothesis with `@settings(max_examples=100+)`
+- When running property-based tests, pass warning "LongRunningPBT" in executePwsh warning field
+- This is "Run All Tasks" mode: orchestrator MUST NOT write code itself, only delegate to `general-task-execution` subagent
+- Must mark tasks as `in_progress` before delegating, `completed` after subagent succeeds
+- Parent tasks marked completed when all children done
+- Checkpoints: run all tests via subagent, verify passing
+- User confirmed DB was busy during last test run, now available for retry
+
+## Files to read
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_tasks_router.py`
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_schedule_properties.py`
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/design.md`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 数据库连接没有变，只不过刚刚数据库在忙，现在可以重试。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 数据库连接没有变，只不过刚刚数据库在忙，现在可以重试。
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 4 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221231.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221231.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-221231] 2026-02-15 22:12:31 +0800
+  - summary: 如何启动，并访问管理后台？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+如何启动，并访问管理后台？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221329.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221329.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-221329] 2026-02-15 22:13:29 +0800
+  - summary: 为我写成PS1 批处理吧。就算退出
+  - prompt:
+```text
+为我写成PS1 批处理吧。就算退出
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221409.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221409.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-221409] 2026-02-15 22:14:09 +0800
+  - summary: 为我写成Powershell 批处理吧。就算退出也不要关闭Powershell 窗口。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+为我写成Powershell 批处理吧。就算退出也不要关闭Powershell 窗口。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221605.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221605.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-221605] 2026-02-15 22:16:05 +0800
+  - summary: 呃...还有个问题，我在文档中明确指出了数据库的测试库需求，但现在使用的是正式库。为我完全复制/镜像现有的库，做一个测试库用于测试和开发，并且配置文件和项目中也使用测试库。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+呃...还有个问题，我在文档中明确指出了数据库的测试库需求，但现在使用的是正式库。为我完全复制/镜像现有的库，做一个测试库用于测试和开发，并且配置文件和项目中也使用测试库。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221741.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_221741.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-221741] 2026-02-15 22:17:41 +0800
+  - summary: scripts 文件夹进行目录优化。归类文件。输出类的放在合理的目录下（我指的是项目中专门的输出目录）
+  - prompt:
+```text
+scripts 文件夹进行目录优化。归类文件。输出类的放在合理的目录下（我指的是项目中专门的输出目录）
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_222253.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_222253.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-222253] 2026-02-15 22:22:53 +0800
+  - summary: 我刚刚整理了路径，按照新的文件路径执行。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我刚刚整理了路径，按照新的文件路径执行。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_222320.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_222320.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-222320] 2026-02-15 22:23:20 +0800
+  - summary: .gitignore 已经不再忽略 tmp/ 和 scripts/logs/，为我更新。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+.gitignore 已经不再忽略 tmp/ 和 scripts/logs/，为我更新。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_222347.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_222347.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-222347] 2026-02-15 22:23:47 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_222458.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_222458.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-222458] 2026-02-15 22:24:58 +0800
+  - summary: 看到你的输出，我已经设置.gitignore 已经不再忽略 tmp/ 和 scripts/logs/。对刚刚的操作有影响么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+看到你的输出，我已经设置.gitignore 已经不再忽略 tmp/ 和 scripts/logs/。对刚刚的操作有影响么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_223342.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_223342.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-223342] 2026-02-15 22:33:42 +0800
+  - summary: 现在还有审计一览表机制么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+现在还有审计一览表机制么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_223713.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_223713.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-223713] 2026-02-15 22:37:13 +0800
+  - summary: 我在想，怎么能合理的安排路径。给我提点合理的意见。比如我在开发调试APPs下的admin-web或小程序服务，或小程序全段或某个ETL的Connector，那么每个模块的文档，审计，脚本测试等等一系列的文件，和总的项目级别的这些文件目录如何…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我在想，怎么能合理的安排路径。给我提点合理的意见。比如我在开发调试APPs下的admin-web或小程序服务，或小程序全段或某个ETL的Connector，那么每个模块的文档，审计，脚本测试等等一系列的文件，和总的项目级别的这些文件目录如何适配或者安排？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_223951.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_223951.md
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+- [P20260215-223951] 2026-02-15 22:39:51 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: 审查 db 目录并…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: 审查 db 目录并创建/完善数据库和结构
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 1-2 (from previous conversation)
+
+**DETAILS**: 创建了 `etl_feiqiu` 和 `zqyy_app` 数据库，六层 schema DDL 全部执行成功，全项目 schema 引用迁移完成（450+ 处替换）。
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `scripts/migrate/fix_schema_refs.py`, `scripts/migrate/batch_schema_rename.py`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 2: 从旧库迁移数据到新库
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 3-4 (from previous conversation)
+
+**DETAILS**: 
+- 旧库 `LLZQ-test` → 新库 `etl_feiqiu` 数据迁移全部完成
+- 73 张有数据表行数全部精确匹配（ODS 23、DWD 40、DWS 8、meta 3）
+- 8 个物化视图（`mv_dws_*`）已重建并填充数据
+- 索引：ods 69、dwd 135、dws 123（含 8 个物化视图索引）、meta 5
+- ANALYZE 已对所有 6 个 schema 执行完毕
+- `zqyy_app` 正式库只有 `admin_users` 1 行数据
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `scripts/migrate/migrate_data.py`, `scripts/migrate/migrate_finalize.py`, `scripts/migrate/migrate_fix_remaining.py`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 3: 创建测试库并更新项目配置
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 用户要求"完全复制/镜像现有的库，做一个测试库用于测试和开发，并且配置文件和项目中也使用测试库"
+
+**DETAILS**:
+
+### 已完成：
+- 通过 dblink 创建了 `test_etl_feiqiu` 和 `test_zqyy_app` 数据库
+- `scripts/ops/clone_to_test_db.py` 脚本执行成功，两个测试库均验证通过（`test_etl_feiqiu: OK`, `test_zqyy_app: OK`）
+- `scripts/ops/fix_test_db.py` 补丁脚本执行成功：
+  - meta 3 表数据全部一致（etl_cursor: 44, etl_run: 8726, etl_task: 49）
+  - 8 个物化视图全部创建成功
+  - 8 个物化视图索引全部 OK
+  - ANALYZE 完成（110 个对象）
+  - 最终验证：全部通过
+- 已更新的配置文件：
+  - `.env` — 添加了 `PG_NAME=test_etl_feiqiu`, `APP_DB_NAME=test_zqyy_app`, `ETL_DB_NAME=test_etl_feiqiu`
+  - `apps/backend/.env.local` — `APP_DB_NAME=test_zqyy_app`, `ETL_DB_NAME=test_etl_feiqiu`
+  - `.env.template` — 默认值更新为测试库名
+  - `apps/backend/app/config.py` — 硬编码默认值改为 `test_zqyy_app` / `test_etl_feiqiu`
+
+### 未完成：
+- ETL 的 `.env` 文件（`apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/.env`）中的 `PG_DSN` 仍指向正式库 `etl_feiqiu`，需要改为 `test_etl_feiqiu`
+- `scripts/ops/clone_to_test_db.py` 中的 `init_test_etl_feiqiu()` 和 `init_test_zqyy_app()` 函数使用相对路径 `BASE_DIR` 查找 DDL 文件，当 cwd 不在项目根目录时会找不到文件（已在输出中看到 `[SKIP] 不存在` 错误），但数据迁移部分不受影响因为是直接从源库 COPY
+- `scripts/ops/clone_to_test_db.py` 中 `migrate_matviews` 函数已修复分号问题（`defn.rstrip().rstrip(";").rstrip()`）
+- FDW 配置（`db/fdw/setup_fdw.sql`）中 `dbname` 仍为 `etl_feiqiu`，测试环境可能需要对应的测试 FDW 配置
+- MCP postgres 工具当前连接的是旧库 `LLZQ-test`，可能需要更新指向测试库
+- `getDiagnostics` 未对修改的配置文件运行
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+1. 更新 `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/.env` 中的 `PG_DSN`：`etl_feiqiu` → `test_etl_feiqiu`
+2. 检查是否还有其他文件引用正式库名需要更新（如 `db/fdw/setup_fdw.sql` 的测试版本）
+3. 对修改的代码文件运行 `getDiagnostics` 验证
+4. 考虑是否需要更新 MCP postgres 配置指向测试库
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `scripts/ops/clone_to_test_db.py`, `scripts/ops/fix_test_db.py`, `.env`, `apps/backend/.env.local`, `.env.template`, `apps/backend/app/config.py`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/.env`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 4: 审计（/audit）
+
+**STATUS**: not-started
+
+**DETAILS**: governance 规则要求对高风险变更运行 `/audit`。本次变更涉及 DB schema 变更、`config/` 目录文件修改、根目录 `.env` 修改，属于高风险。用户需手动触发。
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 系统没有 `psql` 命令行工具，但有 `psycopg2` Python 包
+- shell cwd 可能不在项目根目录（常在 `C:\NeoZQYY\apps\backend`），执行 Python 脚本需用绝对路径 `C:\NeoZQYY\...`
+- Windows 控制台需要 `$env:PYTHONIOENCODING="utf-8"` 处理中文输出
+- MCP postgres 工具当前连接的是旧库 `LLZQ-test`，新库操作通过 dblink 或 psycopg2 脚本
+- `local-Python` 用户是超级用户
+- 数据库连接信息：Host: `100.64.0.4`, Port: `5432`, User: `local-Python`, Password: `Neo-local-1991125`
+- 用户整理了 scripts 目录结构：`scripts/migrate/`（迁移脚本）、`scripts/ops/`（运维脚本）
+- 正式库：`etl_feiqiu`（ETL 数据）、`zqyy_app`（业务应用）
+- 测试库：`test_etl_feiqiu`、`test_zqyy_app`
+- 旧库：`LLZQ-test`（已弃用）
+- 应用角色：`app_reader`（密码：`AppR3ad_2026!`）、`app_user`（密码：`AppUs3r_2026!`）
+
+## Files to read
+- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/.env`
+- `.env`
+- `apps/backend/.env.local`
+- `apps/backend/app/config.py`
+- `scripts/ops/clone_to_test_db.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 继续
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 继续
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. 我刚刚整理了路径，按照新的文件路径执行。
+8. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+9. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+10. 呃...还有个问题，我在文档中明确指出了数据库的测试库需求，但现在使用的是正式库。为我完全复制/镜像现有的库，做一个测试库用于测试和开发，并且配置文件和项目中也使用测试库。
+11. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+12. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+13. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 8 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_224046.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_224046.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-224046] 2026-02-15 22:40:46 +0800
+  - summary: 合理，为我更新并将此修改信息，审计的管理规则在有关的文件中落地。并能保证之后的审计能按此规则走。另外，除审计外，其他方面还要调整么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+合理，为我更新并将此修改信息，审计的管理规则在有关的文件中落地。并能保证之后的审计能按此规则走。另外，除审计外，其他方面还要调整么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_224304.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_224304.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-224304] 2026-02-15 22:43:04 +0800
+  - summary: 呃，但是setup_fdw.sql指向正式库。我开发和修改是用测试库。那么后续工作，会不会有数据不一致的情况？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+呃，但是setup_fdw.sql指向正式库。我开发和修改是用测试库。那么后续工作，会不会有数据不一致的情况？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_224520.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_224520.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-224520] 2026-02-15 22:45:20 +0800
+  - summary: 好的，现状也是如下所示么？数据库的数据及配置，项目里的代码和配置都准备好了么？开发/测试：ETL → test_etl_feiqiu，后端 → test_zqyy_app，FDW → setup_fdw_test.sql生产：ETL → e…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+好的，现状也是如下所示么？数据库的数据及配置，项目里的代码和配置都准备好了么？开发/测试：ETL → test_etl_feiqiu，后端 → test_zqyy_app，FDW → setup_fdw_test.sql生产：ETL → etl_feiqiu，后端 → zqyy_app，FDW → setup_fdw.sql
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_224923.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_224923.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-224923] 2026-02-15 22:49:23 +0800
+  - summary: 我想规范一个行为：在项目中，脚本级别的执行，优先编写合理正确的Python脚本执行。除非我指定使用Powershell或此脚本就是简单命令外，避免Powershell的语法符号问题。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我想规范一个行为：在项目中，脚本级别的执行，优先编写合理正确的Python脚本执行。除非我指定使用Powershell或此脚本就是简单命令外，避免Powershell的语法符号问题。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225014.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225014.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-225014] 2026-02-15 22:50:14 +0800
+  - summary: fdw方面也是双环境都配置好，可用的对吧？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+fdw方面也是双环境都配置好，可用的对吧？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225453.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225453.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-225453] 2026-02-15 22:54:53 +0800
+  - summary: 已经开始进入正式开发阶段了，加上这些规则。另外，以下规则也要落到文档或者项目有关的文件中（甚至.kiro如果必要）。我担心后续Kiro会乱操作文件目录归属：- 审计记录统一落到 docs/audit/changes/（根目录）- 各个APP…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+已经开始进入正式开发阶段了，加上这些规则。另外，以下规则也要落到文档或者项目有关的文件中（甚至.kiro如果必要）。我担心后续Kiro会乱操作文件目录归属：- 审计记录统一落到 docs/audit/changes/（根目录）- 各个APP及Connector 的 docs/、tests/、scripts/ 都是模块专属内容，放在子项目内是对的- 根目录的 docs/（架构、PRD、权限矩阵等）、tests/（属性测试）、scripts/（运维）都是放项目级的相应文件另外，审计文件的迁移也做了吗，没做补上。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225525.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225525.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-225525] 2026-02-15 22:55:25 +0800
+  - summary: 对的，执行起来！否则我开发会出现问题，对吧？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+对的，执行起来！否则我开发会出现问题，对吧？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225857.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225857.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-225857] 2026-02-15 22:58:57 +0800
+  - summary: structure-lite.md是否过重？有没有精简必要？若有详细内容查阅structure.md文件，进行配合？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+structure-lite.md是否过重？有没有精简必要？若有详细内容查阅structure.md文件，进行配合？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225915.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_225915.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-225915] 2026-02-15 22:59:15 +0800
+  - summary: 根据环境设置，应该使用的是数据库test_zqyy_app ，看下是否正常？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+根据环境设置，应该使用的是数据库test_zqyy_app ，看下是否正常？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230145.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230145.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-230145] 2026-02-15 23:01:45 +0800
+  - summary: full 是 inclusion: auto是不是合理一些？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+full 是 inclusion: auto是不是合理一些？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230452.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230452.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-230452] 2026-02-15 23:04:52 +0800
+  - summary: 启动的命令是不是scripts\ops\start-admin.ps1？如果是，帮我写一个bat文件，放在根目录下，运行bat则拉起ps1的脚本，执行管理后台，并用默认浏览器打开后台。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+启动的命令是不是scripts\ops\start-admin.ps1？如果是，帮我写一个bat文件，放在根目录下，运行bat则拉起ps1的脚本，执行管理后台，并用默认浏览器打开后台。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230534.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230534.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-230534] 2026-02-15 23:05:34 +0800
+  - summary: 好的，为我修改。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+好的，为我修改。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230637.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230637.md
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+- [P20260215-230637] 2026-02-15 23:06:37 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: 审计一览表机制现状…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: 审计一览表机制现状调查
+
+**STATUS**: done
+**USER QUERIES**: 1 ("现在还有审计一览表机制么？")
+**DETAILS**: 确认审计一览表机制仍在，但迁移到 monorepo 后路径分裂：ETL 子项目下有完整的 27 条记录，根目录只有 2 条。`gen_audit_dashboard.py` 只扫描 ETL 子项目内的路径。
+**FILEPATHS**: `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/audit/audit_dashboard.md`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/scripts/gen_audit_dashboard.py`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 2: Monorepo 文件路径统一规划（审计 + docs/tests/scripts 两层分治）
+
+**STATUS**: done
+**USER QUERIES**: 2 ("怎么能合理的安排路径"), 3 ("合理，为我更新并将此修改信息...落地"), 4 ("加上这些规则...我担心后续Kiro会乱操作文件目录归属")
+**DETAILS**: 完成了以下所有工作：
+
+1. **审计记录迁移**: ETL 子项目 27 条历史审计记录已复制到根目录 `docs/audit/changes/`（总计 29 条 = 27 历史 + 2 monorepo 新增）
+
+2. **新建项目级一览表生成脚本**: `scripts/audit/gen_audit_dashboard.py`（复用 ETL 子项目的解析模块），已验证运行成功（29 条记录）
+
+3. **更新的配置/steering/hook/agent 文件**:
+   - `.kiro/steering/governance.md` — 审计产物路径明确指向根 `docs/audit/`，补充一览表刷新命令
+   - `.kiro/steering/structure-lite.md` — 精简为 ~24 行，只保留结论性规则
+   - `.kiro/steering/structure.md` — 扩展为 ~112 行，吸收完整目录树、架构模式、文件归属规则展开、速查表；改为 `fileMatch` inclusion
+   - `.kiro/agents/audit-writer.md` — 新增审计产物路径章节，更新刷新命令路径，扩展高风险路径覆盖 admin-web/miniprogram
+   - `.kiro/hooks/run-audit-writer.kiro.hook` — prompt 中补充"统一写入根目录"约束，脚本路径改为 `scripts/audit/gen_audit_dashboard.py`
+   - `.kiro/scripts/audit_flagger.py` — RISK_RULES 扩展了 `apps/admin-web/src/` 和 `apps/miniprogram/(miniapp|miniprogram)/`
+
+4. **更新的文档文件**:
+   - `docs/audit/README.md` — 新建，项目级审计目录说明
+   - `docs/audit/audit_dashboard.md` — 重新生成（29 条）
+   - `docs/README.md` — 更新审计目录描述
+   - `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/audit/README.md` — 标记为历史归档，指向根目录
+   - `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/README.md` — 移除一览表相关说明，指向根目录
+   - `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/scripts/README.md` — 修复旧路径 `C:\ZQYY\FQ-ETL` → `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/`
+   - `scripts/README.md` — 新增 `audit/` 子目录说明
+
+5. **新建文件**:
+   - `scripts/audit/__init__.py`
+   - `scripts/audit/gen_audit_dashboard.py`
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `.kiro/steering/structure-lite.md`, `.kiro/steering/structure.md`, `.kiro/steering/governance.md`, `.kiro/agents/audit-writer.md`, `.kiro/hooks/run-audit-writer.kiro.hook`, `.kiro/scripts/audit_flagger.py`, `docs/audit/README.md`, `docs/audit/audit_dashboard.md`, `docs/README.md`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/audit/README.md`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/README.md`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/scripts/README.md`, `scripts/README.md`, `scripts/audit/gen_audit_dashboard.py`, `scripts/audit/__init__.py`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 3: structure-lite.md 精简 + structure.md 配合
+
+**STATUS**: done
+**USER QUERIES**: 5 ("structure-lite.md是否过重？"), 6 ("full 是 inclusion: auto是不是合理一些？"), 7 ("好的，为我修改")
+**DETAILS**:
+- `structure-lite.md` 从 ~80 行精简到 ~24 行（减少 70%），只保留结论性规则
+- `structure.md` 从 ~50 行扩展到 ~112 行，吸收了归属规则展开、速查表、更新后的完整目录树
+- 用户问 `inclusion: auto`，实际 Kiro 没有 auto 类型，建议用 `fileMatch`
+- `structure.md` 设为 `fileMatch`，pattern: `pyproject.toml,**/pyproject.toml,.kiro/steering/structure-lite.md,.kiro/agents/**`
+- `structure-lite.md` 引导文字更新为说明自动加载条件
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `.kiro/steering/structure-lite.md`, `.kiro/steering/structure.md`
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 审计记录统一落到 `docs/audit/changes/`（根目录），禁止写入子模块内部
+- 各 APP 及 Connector 的 docs/tests/scripts 是模块专属，放子项目内
+- 根目录的 docs/tests/scripts 放项目级文件
+- admin-web 和 miniprogram 已进入正式开发阶段，需要纳入审计高风险路径
+- steering 的 inclusion 类型只有三种：always、manual、fileMatch（没有 auto）
+- Shell 工作目录经常卡在 `apps\backend`，需要用绝对路径 `C:\NeoZQYY\...` 执行命令
+- 项目根目录是 `C:\NeoZQYY`
+
+## Files to read
+- `.kiro/steering/structure-lite.md`
+- `.kiro/steering/structure.md`
+- `.kiro/steering/governance.md`
+- `.kiro/agents/audit-writer.md`
+- `.kiro/scripts/audit_flagger.py`
+- `scripts/audit/gen_audit_dashboard.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 好的，为我修改。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 好的，为我修改。
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+8. full 是 inclusion: auto是不是合理一些？
+9. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+10. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. structure-lite.md是否过重？有没有精简必要？若有详细内容查阅structure.md文件，进行配合？
+13. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+14. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+15. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+16. 已经开始进入正式开发阶段了，加上这些规则。另外，以下规则也要落到文档或者项目有关的文件中（甚至.kiro如果必要）。我担心后续Kiro会乱操作文件目录归属：- 审计记录统一落到 docs/audit/changes/（根目录）- 各个APP及Connector 的 docs/、tests/、scripts/ 都是模块专属内容，放在子项目内是对的- 根目录的 docs/（架构、PRD、权限矩阵等）、tests/（属性测试）、scripts/（运维）都是放项目级的相应文件另外，审计文件的迁移也做了吗，没做补上。
+17. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+18. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+19. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+20. 合理，为我更新并将此修改信息，审计的管理规则在有关的文件中落地。并能保证之后的审计能按此规则走。另外，除审计外，其他方面还要调整么？
+21. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+22. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+23. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+24. 我在想，怎么能合理的安排路径。给我提点合理的意见。比如我在开发调试APPs下的admin-web或小程序服务，或小程序全段或某个ETL的Connector，那么每个模块的文档，审计，脚本测试等等一系列的文件，和总的项目级别的这些文件目录如何适配或者安排？
+25. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+26. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+27. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+28. 现在还有审计一览表机制么？
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 14 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230705.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230705.md
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+- [P20260215-230705] 2026-02-15 23:07:05 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Run All T…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Run All Tasks for admin-web-console Spec
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 1-3 (context transfer from previous conversation)
+
+**DETAILS**: This was a "Run All Tasks" orchestration job for the admin-web-console spec. All 12 tasks were completed across multiple conversations. The spec implements a Web admin console replacing a PySide6 desktop GUI with a FastAPI backend + React frontend.
+
+Key fixes made in this conversation:
+- Fixed `test_schedule_toggle_next_run` — added `deadline=None` to `@settings` decorator (flaky timing)
+- Fixed `test_task_registry_properties.py` — changed `app.dependency_overrides.clear()` to `app.dependency_overrides.pop(get_current_user, None)` to prevent auth state leakage
+- Fixed `test_tasks_router.py` — added `setup_method` to `TestTaskRegistry` class to re-set auth override before each test
+- Fixed `test_queue_properties.py` — added `deadline=None` to `test_execution_history_sort_and_limit`
+- Fixed `test_site_isolation_properties.py` — added `deadline=None` to `test_queue_isolation` and `test_execution_history_isolation`
+
+Final results: Backend 302/302 passed, Frontend 33/33 passed. Task 12 marked complete in tasks.md.
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `.kiro/specs/admin-web-console/tasks.md`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_schedule_properties.py`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_tasks_router.py`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_task_registry_properties.py`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_queue_properties.py`
+- `apps/backend/tests/test_site_isolation_properties.py`
+
+## TASK 2: Verify Database Connection Change
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 4-6
+
+**DETAILS**: User reported database connection changed from `LLZQ-test`. Verified that `apps/backend/.env.local` already had `APP_DB_NAME=test_zqyy_app` and `ETL_DB_NAME=test_etl_feiqiu`. Created a temporary Python script `scripts/ops/_check_db.py` to verify connectivity (deleted after use). Confirmed `test_zqyy_app` database has 11 tables including `admin_users` with seed data (admin user exists).
+
+Default login credentials from seed data (`db/zqyy_app/seeds/admin_web_seed.sql`):
+- Username: `admin`
+- Password: `admin123`
+- site_id: `1`
+
+Database connection params (from root `.env`):
+- `DB_HOST=100.64.0.4`, `DB_PORT=5432`, `DB_USER=local-Python`, `DB_PASSWORD=Neo-local-1991125`
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `.env`
+- `apps/backend/.env.local`
+- `apps/backend/app/config.py`
+- `db/zqyy_app/seeds/admin_web_seed.sql`
+
+## TASK 3: Create start-admin.bat Launcher
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 7-8
+
+**DETAILS**: User asked for a `.bat` file in root directory that calls `scripts/ops/start-admin.ps1` and opens the browser. The ps1 script opens two new PowerShell windows (backend uvicorn on port 8000, frontend pnpm dev on port 5173) and has a `ReadKey` at the end that would block. The bat uses `start` to run ps1 in a new window (non-blocking), waits 6 seconds, then opens `http://localhost:5173` in the default browser.
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `start-admin.bat`
+- `scripts/ops/start-admin.ps1`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- All code comments must be in Simplified Chinese
+- File encoding: UTF-8, no BOM
+- Complex operations should use Python scripts (not PowerShell), placed in `scripts/ops/` for one-off ops scripts
+- Simple single commands (pytest, uv sync, git status) can use shell directly
+- Property tests use hypothesis with `@settings(max_examples=100+)`
+- When running property-based tests, pass warning "LongRunningPBT" in executePwsh warning field
+- Backend testing: `cd apps/backend && uv run python -m pytest tests/ -v`
+- Frontend testing: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec vitest run`
+- Frontend type check: `cd apps/admin-web && pnpm exec tsc --noEmit`
+- Database now uses `test_zqyy_app` (APP_DB_NAME) and `test_etl_feiqiu` (ETL_DB_NAME)
+- Audit reminder is pending but user hasn't triggered `/audit` yet
+- MCP postgres is still connected to `LLZQ-test` (not updated), but backend uses `.env` config correctly
+
+## Files to read
+- `start-admin.bat`
+- `scripts/ops/start-admin.ps1`
+- `apps/backend/.env.local`
+- `apps/backend/app/config.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 启动的命令是不是scripts\ops\start-admin.ps1？如果是，帮我写一个bat文件，放在根目录下，运行bat则拉起ps1的脚本，执行管理后台，并用默认浏览器打开后台。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 启动的命令是不是scripts\ops\start-admin.ps1？如果是，帮我写一个bat文件，放在根目录下，运行bat则拉起ps1的脚本，执行管理后台，并用默认浏览器打开后台。
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+8. 根据环境设置，应该使用的是数据库test_zqyy_app ，看下是否正常？
+9. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+10. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. 数据库连接变了，不再是LLZQ-test，相应进行更新（如果已完成则忽略）。完成后启动后台我试下。账户名密码是多少？
+13. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+14. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+15. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 8 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230745.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_230745.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-230745] 2026-02-15 23:07:45 +0800
+  - summary: 修改下，bat只负责拉起ps1。打开浏览器是用ps1实现，即服务成功启动后就打开浏览器。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+修改下，bat只负责拉起ps1。打开浏览器是用ps1实现，即服务成功启动后就打开浏览器。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231026.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231026.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-231026] 2026-02-15 23:10:26 +0800
+  - summary: 还有几个事情：- 审计根据项目分类了么，包括日常记录和一览，我需要一览里，能根据项目和TEL连接器进行快速筛选。没做补上。- feiqiu的ETL连接器审计文件向项目目录迁移也做了吗，没做补上。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+还有几个事情：- 审计根据项目分类了么，包括日常记录和一览，我需要一览里，能根据项目和TEL连接器进行快速筛选。没做补上。- feiqiu的ETL连接器审计文件向项目目录迁移也做了吗，没做补上。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231119.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231119.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-231119] 2026-02-15 23:11:19 +0800
+  - summary: 不要使用轮询，使用服务成功启动输出判断的方式。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+不要使用轮询，使用服务成功启动输出判断的方式。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231434.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231434.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-231434] 2026-02-15 23:14:34 +0800
+  - summary: 我启动了bat.然后闪退了，什么都没发生。为我debug
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我启动了bat.然后闪退了，什么都没发生。为我debug
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231557.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231557.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-231557] 2026-02-15 23:15:57 +0800
+  - summary: 帮我升级安装最新的Powershell
+  - prompt:
+```text
+帮我升级安装最新的Powershell
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231651.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_231651.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-231651] 2026-02-15 23:16:51 +0800
+  - summary: ETL 子项目下也保留了 27 条（历史归档）不需要，直接删掉，只留一份在一级目录。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+ETL 子项目下也保留了 27 条（历史归档）不需要，直接删掉，只留一份在一级目录。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_232141.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_232141.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-232141] 2026-02-15 23:21:41 +0800
+  - summary: 下载好了：C:\Users\Administrator\DownloadsPowerShell-7.5.4-win-x64.msi修改依赖和配置，powershell默认使用新版本！另外，Kiro每个对话，执行的命令，使用独立的Powers…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+下载好了：C:\Users\Administrator\DownloadsPowerShell-7.5.4-win-x64.msi修改依赖和配置，powershell默认使用新版本！另外，Kiro每个对话，执行的命令，使用独立的Powershell进程。我发现好几次2个对话使用了一个Powershell进程，引起了麻烦。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_232501.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_232501.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-232501] 2026-02-15 23:25:01 +0800
+  - summary: 运行了start-admin-debug.bat，卡住了，你查下debug-output.txt，进行Debug
+  - prompt:
+```text
+运行了start-admin-debug.bat，卡住了，你查下debug-output.txt，进行Debug
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_233152.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_233152.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-233152] 2026-02-15 23:31:52 +0800
+  - summary: 为我配置：windows 下，默认也使用7。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+为我配置：windows 下，默认也使用7。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_233420.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_233420.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-233420] 2026-02-15 23:34:20 +0800
+  - summary: CMD提示30秒，卡住。ps内容：Windows PowerShell版权所有 (C) Microsoft Corporation。保留所有权利。加载个人及系统配置文件用了 6673 毫秒。=== 后端 FastAPI ===INFO: W…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CMD提示30秒，卡住。ps内容：Windows PowerShell版权所有 (C) Microsoft Corporation。保留所有权利。加载个人及系统配置文件用了 6673 毫秒。=== 后端 FastAPI ===INFO:     Will watch for changes in these directories: ['C:\\NeoZQYY\\apps\\backend']INFO:     Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8000 (Press CTRL+C to quit)INFO:     Started reloader process [7504] using WatchFilesINFO:     Started server process [8776]INFO:     Waiting for application startup.INFO:     Application startup complete.--------------------Windows PowerShell版权所有 (C) Microsoft Corporation。保留所有权利。加载个人及系统配置文件用了 5839 毫秒。=== 前端 Vite ===> admin-web@0.1.0 dev C:\NeoZQYY\apps\admin-web> viteVITE v6.3.5  ready in 916 ms鉃?[39m  Local:   http://localhost:5173/鉃?[39m  Network: use --host to expose鉃?[39m  press h + enter to show help----------------另外，我换了新版本的Powershell 7 
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_233503.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_233503.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-233503] 2026-02-15 23:35:03 +0800
+  - summary: Windows Terminal 未安装？Windows Terminal 指什么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+Windows Terminal 未安装？Windows Terminal 指什么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_233930.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_233930.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-233930] 2026-02-15 23:39:30 +0800
+  - summary: ========================================NeoZQYY 管理后台启动脚本========================================项目根目录: C:\NeoZQYY启动失败: T…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+========================================NeoZQYY 管理后台启动脚本========================================项目根目录: C:\NeoZQYY启动失败: The process cannot access the file 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\neozqyy_frontend.log' because it is being used by another process.at <ScriptBlock>, C:\NeoZQYY\scripts\ops\start-admin.ps1: line 29按任意键关闭此窗口...
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_234537.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_234537.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-234537] 2026-02-15 23:45:37 +0800
+  - summary: 用户名密码是什么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+用户名密码是什么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_234724.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_234724.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-234724] 2026-02-15 23:47:24 +0800
+  - summary: 修改密码为随机的64位强密码。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+修改密码为随机的64位强密码。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_234904.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_234904.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-234904] 2026-02-15 23:49:04 +0800
+  - summary: 为什么管理后台登录后正常内容删了一下，然后白屏了？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+为什么管理后台登录后正常内容删了一下，然后白屏了？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_234919.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_234919.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-234919] 2026-02-15 23:49:19 +0800
+  - summary: 聚焦apps\etl\pipelines\feiqiu我要做几个重要重构和BUG的任务：1、任务方面，根据文档，评估当前做法是否臃肿，我需要精简后，将其提到项目层面，不在为非球连接器独用。2、ETL流程方面，已经有了全部流程的文档：API的…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+聚焦apps\etl\pipelines\feiqiu我要做几个重要重构和BUG的任务：1、任务方面，根据文档，评估当前做法是否臃肿，我需要精简后，将其提到项目层面，不在为非球连接器独用。2、ETL流程方面，已经有了全部流程的文档：API的调用返回文档，ODS DWD DWS设计文档那个，架构文档，字段文档，处理过程文档等全都存在。现在是否可以调试整个ETL流程，并Debug。为我完成。并记录Debug报告。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_235314.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_235314.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-235314] 2026-02-15 23:53:14 +0800
+  - summary: 依然白屏。如果出现白屏，能不能报错呢？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+依然白屏。如果出现白屏，能不能报错呢？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_235720.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260215_235720.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260215-235720] 2026-02-15 23:57:20 +0800
+  - summary: 我打错字了，我想说的是：登录成功后正常内容闪了一下，然后白屏了另外，这个前端PowerShell 乱码，其他2个PowerShell 窗口是正常的。现实PowerShell 7.5.4=== 前端 Vite ===> admin-web@0…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我打错字了，我想说的是：登录成功后正常内容闪了一下，然后白屏了另外，这个前端PowerShell  乱码，其他2个PowerShell  窗口是正常的。现实PowerShell 7.5.4=== 前端 Vite ===> admin-web@0.1.0 dev C:\NeoZQYY\apps\admin-web> vite[32m[1mVITE[22m v6.3.5[39m  [2mready in [0m[1m407[22m[2m[0m ms[22m[32m鉃?[39m  [1mLocal[22m:   [36mhttp://localhost:[1m5173[22m/[39m[2m  [32m鉃?[39m  [1mNetwork[22m[2m: use [22m[1m--host[22m[2m to expose[22m[2m[32m  鉃?[39m[22m[2m  press [22m[1mh + enter[22m[2m to show help[22m
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_000315.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_000315.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-000315] 2026-02-16 00:03:15 +0800
+  - summary: 我关闭了前后端，你自己启动吧。另外，用户名：admin。密码：%nCpJg9J&<uN>FFT!_&:6TX1zk}|NPkkWjsW;u!dQQ>St!}Tn8{iTP.&*p!mu#UT继续你的Debug
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我关闭了前后端，你自己启动吧。另外，用户名：admin。密码：%nCpJg9J&<uN>FFT!_&:6TX1zk}|NPkkWjsW;u!dQQ>St!}Tn8{iTP.&*p!mu#UT继续你的Debug
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_001111.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_001111.md
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+- [P20260216-001111] 2026-02-16 00:11:11 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Fix admin…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Fix admin-web white screen after login
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 1 ("为什么管理后台登录后正常内容删了一下，然后白屏了？"), 3 ("依然白屏。如果出现白屏，能不能报错呢？"), 5 ("我打错字了，我想说的是：登录成功后正常内容闪了一下，然后白屏了")
+
+**DETAILS**:
+
+Root cause identified and fixed through live browser debugging with Playwright:
+
+- The backend endpoints `/api/tasks/registry` and `/api/tasks/dwd-tables` return wrapped responses: `{"groups": {"域名": [...]}}` 
+- The frontend `fetchTaskRegistry()` and `fetchDwdTables()` in `tasks.ts` were NOT unwrapping `.groups`, treating the entire response object as the data map
+- Additionally, `fetchDwdTables` expected `Record<string, string[]>` but backend returns `Record<string, DwdTableItem[]>` (objects, not strings)
+- `DwdTableSelector` component called `tables.map()` on object values → `TypeError: tables.map is not a function`
+- No React Error Boundary existed → entire render tree crashed → white screen
+
+**Files changed**:
+
+1. `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts` — Fixed `fetchTaskRegistry()` to unwrap `.groups` from response; Fixed `fetchDwdTables()` to unwrap `.groups` AND extract `.table_name` from each item to produce `string[]`
+2. `apps/admin-web/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx` — NEW FILE: React class component Error Boundary showing error message + reload button instead of white screen
+3. `apps/admin-web/src/main.tsx` — Wrapped `<App>` with `<ErrorBoundary>` at root level
+
+**Additional defensive changes** (not the root cause but kept as protection):
+
+4. `apps/admin-web/src/api/client.ts` — `clearTokensAndRedirect()` now dispatches `window.dispatchEvent(new Event("auth:force-logout"))` before hard redirect, to sync Zustand store state
+5. `apps/admin-web/src/store/authStore.ts` — Added `window.addEventListener("auth:force-logout", ...)` listener that calls `logout()` to clear Zustand state when axios interceptor forces logout. Changed `create<AuthState>((set)` to `create<AuthState>((set, get)` (though `get` isn't used yet)
+
+**Verification**: Successfully logged in with real credentials via Playwright browser, full page rendered correctly with sidebar, task config, 52 tasks, 40 DWD tables, action buttons. No more white screen.
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/main.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/api/client.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/store/authStore.ts`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 2: PowerShell terminal encoding issue (乱码)
+
+**STATUS**: not-started
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 5 ("这个前端PowerShell 乱码，其他2个PowerShell 窗口是正常的")
+
+**DETAILS**: User reported that the Vite dev server terminal shows garbled ANSI escape codes (乱码) in one PowerShell window while other two PowerShell windows display correctly. This was mentioned but not addressed — focus was on the white screen bug.
+
+**FILEPATHS**: `scripts/ops/start-admin.ps1`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 3: Audit pending
+
+**STATUS**: not-started
+
+**USER QUERIES**: System hook reminders throughout conversation
+
+**DETAILS**: The governance hooks flagged audit required for changes in `admin-web/src/` (high-risk path). User should manually trigger `/audit` when ready. Changed files: `tasks.ts`, `client.ts`, `authStore.ts`, `main.tsx`, new `ErrorBoundary.tsx`.
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- All explanatory text must be in simplified Chinese (强制)
+- Code identifiers stay in English
+- Login credentials: username `admin`, password `%nCpJg9J&<uN>FFT!_&:6TX1zk}|NPkkWjsW;u!dQQ>St!}Tn8{iTP.&*p!mu#UT`
+- Backend runs via `uv run uvicorn app.main:app --port 8000` from `apps/backend/`
+- Frontend runs via `npx vite` from `apps/admin-web/` (may pick different port if 5173 occupied)
+- Vite proxy config forwards `/api` to `localhost:8000`
+- Python scripts preferred over complex PowerShell for multi-step operations
+- Audit artifacts go to `docs/audit/`, never inside submodules
+- Backend connects to `test_zqyy_app` database (configured in `apps/backend/.env.local`)
+
+## Files to read
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/ErrorBoundary.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/main.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/client.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/store/authStore.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/App.tsx`
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 我关闭了前后端，你自己启动吧。另外，用户名：admin。密码：%nCpJg9J&<uN>FFT!_&:6TX1zk}|NPkkWjsW;u!dQQ>St!}Tn8{iTP.&*p!mu#UT继续你的Debug
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 我关闭了前后端，你自己启动吧。另外，用户名：admin。密码：%nCpJg9J&<uN>FFT!_&:6TX1zk}|NPkkWjsW;u!dQQ>St!}Tn8{iTP.&*p!mu#UT继续你的Debug
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. 我打错字了，我想说的是：登录成功后正常内容闪了一下，然后白屏了另外，这个前端PowerShell  乱码，其他2个PowerShell  窗口是正常的。现实PowerShell 7.5.4=== 前端 Vite ===> admin-web@0.1.0 dev C:\NeoZQYY\apps\admin-web> vite[32m[1mVITE[22m v6.3.5[39m  [2mready in [0m[1m407[22m[2m[0m ms[22m[32m鉃?[39m  [1mLocal[22m:   [36mhttp://localhost:[1m5173[22m/[39m[2m  [32m鉃?[39m  [1mNetwork[22m[2m: use [22m[1m--host[22m[2m to expose[22m[2m[32m  鉃?[39m[22m[2m  press [22m[1mh + enter[22m[2m to show help[22m
+8. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+9. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+10. 依然白屏。如果出现白屏，能不能报错呢？
+11. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:miniprogram, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+12. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+13. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+14. 为什么管理后台登录后正常内容删了一下，然后白屏了？
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 8 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_003042.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_003042.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-003042] 2026-02-16 00:30:42 +0800
+  - summary: 性能分析应该早布局，也就是在全量数据刷新时，就打点计时的工作就已经开始了
+  - prompt:
+```text
+性能分析应该早布局，也就是在全量数据刷新时，就打点计时的工作就已经开始了
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_033648.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_033648.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-033648] 2026-02-16 03:36:48 +0800
+  - summary: 已经执行taskkill /F /IM python.exe继续你的测试
+  - prompt:
+```text
+已经执行taskkill /F /IM python.exe继续你的测试
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_123626.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_123626.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-123626] 2026-02-16 12:36:26 +0800
+  - summary: 根据处理过程和结构文档，告诉我从API 到 DWD 各层，各表各字段的处理简述和字段异同对比。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+根据处理过程和结构文档，告诉我从API 到 DWD 各层，各表各字段的处理简述和字段异同对比。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_130804.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_130804.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-130804] 2026-02-16 13:08:04 +0800
+  - summary: 这个文档，没有将API字段映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+这个文档，没有将API字段映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_130848.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_130848.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-130848] 2026-02-16 13:08:48 +0800
+  - summary: 这个文档，没有将API字段映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+这个文档，没有将API字段映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_130940.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_130940.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-130940] 2026-02-16 13:09:40 +0800
+  - summary: 你好
+  - prompt:
+```text
+你好
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_130959.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_130959.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-130959] 2026-02-16 13:09:59 +0800
+  - summary: 这个文档，没有将API字段映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+这个文档，没有将API字段映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_131105.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_131105.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-131105] 2026-02-16 13:11:05 +0800
+  - summary: 这个文档，没有将API源字段以及映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+这个文档，没有将API源字段以及映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_131449.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_131449.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-131449] 2026-02-16 13:14:49 +0800
+  - summary: 这个文档，没有将API源字段以及映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。注意，从API获取的JSON进行分析，不要从处理的代码进行分析，因为有些字段可能没处理。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+这个文档，没有将API源字段以及映射到ODS的关系进行说明，补充。注意，从API获取的JSON进行分析，不要从处理的代码进行分析，因为有些字段可能没处理。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_131912.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_131912.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-131912] 2026-02-16 13:19:12 +0800
+  - summary: feiqiu的ETL中，Json存储在哪里？哪里定义的？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+feiqiu的ETL中，Json存储在哪里？哪里定义的？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_134338.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_134338.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-134338] 2026-02-16 13:43:38 +0800
+  - summary: 还是不太全。我想通过一个文档，介绍说明以下现状：1 使用真实API请求，获取的Json，一次获取真实数据200条。事实表从今天开始往前算，10天为批次，如果不足200条，则再加10天期限，重新申请，单表最大重试次数 10次。维表则不需要指定…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+还是不太全。我想通过一个文档，介绍说明以下现状：1 使用真实API请求，获取的Json，一次获取真实数据200条。事实表从今天开始往前算，10天为批次，如果不足200条，则再加10天期限，重新申请，单表最大重试次数 10次。维表则不需要指定日期，200条为一个批次，1个批次即可。保存在 tmp ，反正该合适的目录下。2 从刚刚Json中，分析结构，表格列举各字段的结构，字段作用说明。以及ODS 映射关系，哪些字段没有进行映射。3 ODS 分析结构，表格列举各字段的结构，以及上游JSON的映射关系，有映射的加跳转链接，没有进行映射的字段等关系说明。还有下游DWD映射关系，有映射的加跳转链接，没有进行映射的字段等关系说明。4 DWD 分析结构，表格列举各字段的结构，以及上游ODS的映射关系，有映射的加跳转链接，没有进行映射的字段等关系说明。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_135112.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_135112.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-135112] 2026-02-16 13:51:12 +0800
+  - summary: .env文件有定义么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+.env文件有定义么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_142421.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_142421.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-142421] 2026-02-16 14:24:21 +0800
+  - summary: 从哪个入口启动，才会落盘？比如在执行这个spec时，并没有落盘：.kiro\specs\etl-pipeline-debug
+  - prompt:
+```text
+从哪个入口启动，才会落盘？比如在执行这个spec时，并没有落盘：.kiro\specs\etl-pipeline-debug
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_143004.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_143004.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-143004] 2026-02-16 14:30:04 +0800
+  - summary: 没有，我确信是走的在线模式。抓取的真实信息。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+没有，我确信是走的在线模式。抓取的真实信息。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_143459.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_143459.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-143459] 2026-02-16 14:34:59 +0800
+  - summary: 我还是希望.env来统一控制输出，不然这个.env没有意义了，对吧？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我还是希望.env来统一控制输出，不然这个.env没有意义了，对吧？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_145234.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_145234.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-145234] 2026-02-16 14:52:34 +0800
+  - summary: 距离API - ODS - DWD的结构审计完美文档还差一步： - 数据源：先明确，JSON是通过API申请的新鲜数据。ODS 和 DWD 是查库得到，不要受到文档和DDL的影响。- API 源字段 表格：数据源：展开全部Json结构，在J…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+距离API - ODS - DWD的结构审计完美文档还差一步： - 数据源：先明确，JSON是通过API申请的新鲜数据。ODS 和 DWD 是查库得到，不要受到文档和DDL的影响。- API 源字段 表格：数据源：展开全部Json结构，在JSON字段列，要明确展示出层级结构。并且在做这一步时，遍历获取的Json文件，拼合出所有数据记录的最全字段结构，进行数据结构分析。增加列：字段作用列。结合JSON ODS DWD数据及相关文档，说明该字段作用和意义。说明列：改名为 “处理”。被忽略没有处理的字段/目录需要说明好。表格结束进行总结：现在的统计总结不够详细。- ODS DWD 表格：数据源：表中所有列都要列全，无论是源数据还是版本控制等字段。增加列：同上，字段作用列。结合JSON ODS DWD数据及相关文档，说明该字段作用和意义。表格结束进行总结：增加字段统计总结，和上下游情况总结，稍微详细一些。然后：这个脚本，任务化，用来分析API的返回数据变化。可以定义日期和条数。放在web-admin中管理，保存落盘依据.env，增加一个目录参数，类似：SYSTEM_ANALYZEe_ROOT。用于定义目录。如果需要你的参与， 则写成HOOKs手动执行。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_151130.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_151130.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-151130] 2026-02-16 15:11:30 +0800
+  - summary: 补充：`scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` 全链路数据流文档生成器生成的文档样本是：docs\reports\dataflow_api_ods_dwd.md我的原始需求：- 数据源：先明确，JSON是…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+补充：`scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` 全链路数据流文档生成器生成的文档样本是：docs\reports\dataflow_api_ods_dwd.md我的原始需求：- 数据源：先明确，JSON是通过API申请的新鲜数据。ODS 和 DWD 是查库得到，不要受到文档和DDL的影响。- API 源字段 表格：数据源：展开全部Json结构，在JSON字段列，要明确展示出层级结构。并且在做这一步时，遍历获取的Json文件，拼合出所有数据记录的最全字段结构，进行数据结构分析。增加列：字段作用列。结合JSON ODS DWD数据及相关文档，说明该字段作用和意义。说明列：改名为 “处理”。被忽略没有处理的字段/目录需要说明好。表格结束进行总结：现在的统计总结不够详细。- ODS DWD 表格：数据源：表中所有列都要列全，无论是源数据还是版本控制等字段。增加列：同上，字段作用列。结合JSON ODS DWD数据及相关文档，说明该字段作用和意义。表格结束进行总结：增加字段统计总结，和上下游情况总结，稍微详细一些。此外，我想将这个分析API的返回数据变化与ETL库字段情况的任务进行规范话化：- 若这些需求，需要你的参与，则写成HOOKs手动执行。- 若python脚本完全能实现，则web-admin任务化，可以定义日期和条数。放在web-admin中管理，保存落盘依据.env，增加一个目录参数，类似：SYSTEM_ANALYZEe_ROOT。用于定义目录路径。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_151411.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_151411.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-151411] 2026-02-16 15:14:11 +0800
+  - summary: 这个是二选一！！此外，我想将这个分析API的返回数据变化与ETL库字段情况的任务进行规范话化：- 若这些需求，需要你的参与，则写成HOOKs手动执行。- 若python脚本完全能实现，则web-admin任务化，可以定义日期和条数。放在we…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+这个是二选一！！此外，我想将这个分析API的返回数据变化与ETL库字段情况的任务进行规范话化：- 若这些需求，需要你的参与，则写成HOOKs手动执行。- 若python脚本完全能实现，则web-admin任务化，可以定义日期和条数。放在web-admin中管理，保存落盘依据.env，增加一个目录参数，类似：SYSTEM_ANALYZEe_ROOT。用于定义目录路径。
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_151544.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_151544.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-151544] 2026-02-16 15:15:44 +0800
+  - summary: 但是总结方面，代码理解方面，编排方面，不是Kiro做的么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+但是总结方面，代码理解方面，编排方面，不是Kiro做的么？
+```
--- a/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_151843.md
+++ b/docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_151843.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260216-151843] 2026-02-16 15:18:43 +0800
+  - summary: 这样太麻烦了，全都用HOOK完成吧，只不过有些Python脚本可以固化（JSON 展开、DB 查询）。但 映射计算，统计总结，"字段作用"推断、代码理解、总结编排这个还是Kiro做吧，毕竟Python无法灵活读懂字段，也就无法映射计算。我理…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+这样太麻烦了，全都用HOOK完成吧，只不过有些Python脚本可以固化（JSON 展开、DB 查询）。但 映射计算，统计总结，"字段作用"推断、代码理解、总结编排这个还是Kiro做吧，毕竟Python无法灵活读懂字段，也就无法映射计算。我理解的对么？
+```
--- a/Show More
+++ b/Show More