在准备环境前提交次全部更改。
This commit is contained in:
152
docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_200722.md
Normal file
152
docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260216_200722.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
|
||||
- [P20260216-200722] 2026-02-16 20:07:22 +0800
|
||||
- summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: 数据流结构分析 —…
|
||||
- prompt:
|
||||
```text
|
||||
CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
## TASK 1: 数据流结构分析 — 完整三阶段执行
|
||||
|
||||
**STATUS**: in-progress
|
||||
|
||||
**USER QUERIES**: 1 ("执行数据流结构分析,按以下步骤完成:第一阶段数据采集、第二阶段语义分析、第三阶段报告生成")
|
||||
|
||||
**DETAILS**:
|
||||
|
||||
### 第一阶段:数据采集 — DONE
|
||||
- Ran `python scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py --limit 200` successfully
|
||||
- 23 tables collected, all succeeded, 3405 total records
|
||||
- Output to `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\` with subdirs: `json_trees/`, `db_schemas/`, `collection_manifest.json`
|
||||
- DWD tables all returned 0 columns (DWD table names don't match ODS table names — DWD uses dimension/fact table names like `dim_member`, `dim_assistant`, not the ODS raw table names). This is expected behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
### 第二阶段:语义分析 — IN PROGRESS (data reading complete, analysis not started)
|
||||
- **ALL 23 json_trees files have been read** into context — complete field structures for all tables
|
||||
- **5 ODS schema files read**: `ods_settlement_records.json`, `ods_payment_transactions.json`, `ods_member_profiles.json`, `ods_assistant_accounts_master.json`, `ods_site_tables_master.json` — these contain DDL COMMENT annotations with field descriptions
|
||||
- **Remaining 18 ODS schema files NOT yet read** — need to read them for complete mapping
|
||||
- **DWD schema files all empty** (0 columns) due to table name mismatch
|
||||
- **ETL loaders directory explored**: `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/loaders/` has `ods/generic.py`, `dimensions/`, `facts/`, `base_loader.py`
|
||||
- **ETL source code NOT yet read** — needed for understanding ODS→DWD mapping logic
|
||||
|
||||
### 第三阶段:报告生成 — NOT STARTED
|
||||
- Need to generate final Markdown report with:
|
||||
- Per-table: API source field tables, ODS tables, DWD tables
|
||||
- JSON→ODS mapping (matched, payload-only, ignored fields)
|
||||
- ODS→DWD mapping (direct, ETL-derived, SCD2 version control columns)
|
||||
- Field coverage stats, type distribution, upstream/downstream mapping coverage
|
||||
- Save to `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT` (`C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\`) as `dataflow_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Data Summary from collection_manifest.json:
|
||||
| Table | Records | ODS Cols | DWD Cols |
|
||||
|-------|---------|----------|----------|
|
||||
| assistant_accounts_master | 69 | 67 | 0 |
|
||||
| settlement_records | 200 | 71 | 0 |
|
||||
| table_fee_transactions | 200 | 47 | 0 |
|
||||
| assistant_service_records | 200 | 71 | 0 |
|
||||
| assistant_cancellation_records | 79 | 19 | 0 |
|
||||
| store_goods_sales_records | 200 | 56 | 0 |
|
||||
| payment_transactions | 200 | 17 | 0 |
|
||||
| refund_transactions | 36 | 37 | 0 |
|
||||
| platform_coupon_redemption_records | 200 | 31 | 0 |
|
||||
| member_profiles | 200 | 25 | 0 |
|
||||
| member_stored_value_cards | 200 | 80 | 0 |
|
||||
| member_balance_changes | 200 | 33 | 0 |
|
||||
| recharge_settlements | 200 | 71 | 0 |
|
||||
| group_buy_packages | 18 | 43 | 0 |
|
||||
| group_buy_redemption_records | 200 | 57 | 0 |
|
||||
| goods_stock_summary | 173 | 19 | 0 |
|
||||
| goods_stock_movements | 200 | 24 | 0 |
|
||||
| site_tables_master | 74 | 31 | 0 |
|
||||
| stock_goods_category_tree | 9 | 16 | 0 |
|
||||
| store_goods_master | 173 | 52 | 0 |
|
||||
| table_fee_discount_records | 200 | 33 | 0 |
|
||||
| tenant_goods_master | 174 | 37 | 0 |
|
||||
| settlement_ticket_details | 0 | 43 | 0 |
|
||||
|
||||
### ODS Schema Pattern (from read files):
|
||||
- Each ODS table has ETL metadata columns: `content_hash`, `source_file`, `source_endpoint`, `fetched_at`, `payload` (jsonb)
|
||||
- ODS columns are lowercase versions of JSON camelCase fields (e.g., `settleList.balanceAmount` → `balanceamount`)
|
||||
- Many tables store nested objects like `siteProfile` as jsonb or flatten the list-key fields only
|
||||
- DDL COMMENTs follow pattern: `【说明】...【示例】...【JSON字段】...`
|
||||
|
||||
**NEXT STEPS**:
|
||||
1. Read remaining ODS schema files (18 more) from `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\db_schemas\ods_*.json`
|
||||
2. Read ETL source code for data flow understanding:
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/loaders/ods/generic.py` (ODS loader)
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/loaders/base_loader.py`
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/scd/` directory (SCD2 logic for DWD)
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/` directory (task definitions)
|
||||
3. For each of the 23 tables, compute:
|
||||
- JSON→ODS field mapping (semantic matching between camelCase JSON paths and lowercase ODS columns)
|
||||
- Field purpose inference using DDL COMMENT + JSON samples + ETL code
|
||||
- ODS→DWD mapping (requires reading DWD DDL files from `db/etl_feiqiu/schemas/` since runtime query returned empty)
|
||||
4. Generate per-table statistics: field coverage rate, type distribution, mapping coverage
|
||||
5. Assemble final Markdown report and save to `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\dataflow_2026-02-16_HHMMSS.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**FILEPATHS**:
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` — CLI entry point
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/dataflow_analyzer.py` — core collection module with ODS_SPECS
|
||||
- `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\collection_manifest.json` — collection results
|
||||
- `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\json_trees\*.json` — 23 JSON tree files (all read)
|
||||
- `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\db_schemas\ods_*.json` — 23 ODS schema files (5 read)
|
||||
- `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\db_schemas\dwd_*.json` — 23 DWD schema files (all empty/0 cols)
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/loaders/` — ETL loader code
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/architecture/data_flow.md` — architecture doc (read)
|
||||
- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-structure-audit/tasks.md` — spec tasks (all completed)
|
||||
|
||||
**USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS**:
|
||||
- 当前仅分析飞球(feiqiu)连接器
|
||||
- 报告使用中文
|
||||
- Output to `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT` = `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis`
|
||||
- Filename format: `dataflow_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.md`
|
||||
- DWD layer uses different table names (dim_member, dim_assistant, fact_* etc.) not the ODS raw table names — need to look at DDL files or ETL code to find the actual DWD table mappings
|
||||
- The workspace steering rules require: Chinese output, UTF-8, audit for high-risk changes, Python scripts for complex ops
|
||||
- This is a Kiro Hook-triggered analysis workflow (hook at `.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Files to read
|
||||
- `C:\NeoZQYY\export\dataflow_analysis\collection_manifest.json`
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/loaders/ods/generic.py`
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/loaders/base_loader.py`
|
||||
- `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/docs/architecture/data_flow.md`
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/dataflow_analyzer.py`
|
||||
- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-structure-audit/tasks.md`
|
||||
|
||||
USER QUERIES(most recent first):
|
||||
1. <source-event>
|
||||
The user manually invoked this action
|
||||
The user is focued on the following file: No file focused
|
||||
The user has the following paths open: \apps\etl\pipelines\feiqiu\config\env_parser.py, \apps\etl\pipelines\feiqiu\config\env_parser.py
|
||||
</source-event>
|
||||
|
||||
执行数据流结构分析,按以下步骤完成:
|
||||
|
||||
第一阶段:数据采集
|
||||
1. 运行 `python scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` 完成数据采集(API JSON 原始数据 + DB 表结构查询)
|
||||
2. 确认采集结果已落盘到 SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT(或 docs/reports/)目录下的 api_samples/、json_trees/、db_schemas/ 子目录
|
||||
|
||||
第二阶段:语义分析
|
||||
3. 读取采集结果中的 JSON 文件(json_trees/、db_schemas/、collection_manifest.json)
|
||||
4. 读取 ETL 源码(apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/ 下的 loaders/、tasks/、models/、scd/ 等模块)理解数据流转逻辑
|
||||
5. 为每个字段推断作用说明:优先使用 DDL COMMENT 注释,结合 ETL 源码映射关系和 JSON 数据样本综合判断
|
||||
6. 计算 JSON → ODS 映射关系:基于字段语义匹配,标注已映射、仅存于 payload、被忽略的字段
|
||||
7. 计算 ODS → DWD 映射关系:基于 ETL loader/task 源码理解数据流转,标注直接映射、ETL 派生、SCD2 版本控制列
|
||||
|
||||
第三阶段:报告生成
|
||||
8. 编排统计总结:为每个表格生成有业务语义的字段统计(字段覆盖率、类型分布、上下游映射覆盖率)
|
||||
9. 组装最终 Markdown 报告,包含 API 源字段表格、ODS 表格、DWD 表格及各自的统计总结
|
||||
10. 将报告保存到 SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT 目录,使用 dataflow_YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS.md 格式命名
|
||||
11. 输出文件路径和关键统计摘要
|
||||
|
||||
注意:当前仅分析飞球(feiqiu)连接器。未来新增连接器时,应自动发现并纳入分析范围。
|
||||
2. <implicit-rules>## Implicit Rules
|
||||
You are working on the implementation plan.
|
||||
Ensure each task is actionable, references specific requirements, and focuses only on coding activities.
|
||||
Once approved, inform the user that the spec is complete and they can begin implementing the tasks by opening the tasks.md file.</implicit-rules>
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
METADATA:
|
||||
The previous conversation had 2 messages.
|
||||
|
||||
INSTRUCTIONS:
|
||||
Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
|
||||
IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user