在前后端开发联调前 的提交20260223

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_084557.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-084557] 2026-02-19 08:45:57 +0800
+  - summary: - 加一个自动化检查脚本（比如 CI 中对比两边的任务列表），避免手动同步遗漏。这个好，加入这个功能，放在 任务选择 title 旁边，若有差异则提醒。点击后打开新页面展示差异。- 任务选择 全选之前加入按钮：全选常用任务。反选后面加入按钮…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+- 加一个自动化检查脚本（比如 CI 中对比两边的任务列表），避免手动同步遗漏。这个好，加入这个功能，放在 任务选择 title 旁边，若有差异则提醒。点击后打开新页面展示差异。- 任务选择 全选之前加入按钮：全选常用任务。反选后面加入按钮 清空。- 把前端的 FLOW_DEFINITIONS 改为从 API 动态加载，本地定义仅作 fallback。- 现在的交互还是不对：如果按照现在的方案，以业务场景分类，则每一层都应包含 ODS - DWD - DWS（index）全路径。比如助教类，就会有从ODS一直到DWS和index的全部相关任务。所以，DWD方面还要优化，这样的交互应该是合理的吧？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_084845.md

@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+- [P20260219-084845] 2026-02-19 08:48:45 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Admin-web…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Admin-web 同步检查与 Bug 修复（ETL 重构后）
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1 (from earlier context transfer)
+- **DETAILS**: 在大量 ETL 重构后，全面检查并修复了 admin-web 前端与后端的同步问题。共 12 处修复，构建验证通过。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/backend/app/config.py`, `apps/backend/app/services/cli_builder.py`, `apps/backend/app/schemas/tasks.py`, `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/components/ScheduleTab.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/store/authStore.ts`, `apps/admin-web/vite.config.ts`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 2: ETL 执行深度分析 + Bug 修复
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 2-6 (from earlier context transfer)
+- **DETAILS**: 用户从 admin-web 执行 api_full 任务，16.8 秒就"完成"，用户质疑。深度分析发现 5 个关键问题并全部修复。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/ods/ods_json_archive_task.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/verification/base_verifier.py`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`, `scripts/ops/fix_admin_site_id.py`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 3: Admin-web 全面 UI 优化
+
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: 7-12 (across context transfers), plus current conversation queries
+- **DETAILS**: 用户要求全面优化 admin-web 所有页面。大部分页面已完成优化。当前正在进行 TaskSelector 的重大重构。
+
+### 已完成的子任务：
+1. **skip-quality 移除** — 从 `TaskConfig.tsx` 移除了 `skipQuality` state、Checkbox UI、useEffect 依赖
+2. **is_common 字段全链路** — 后端 `TaskDefinition` dataclass 添加 `is_common: bool = True`，`TaskItem` 响应模型、API 序列化、前端类型、TaskSelector 排序+标签显示全部打通
+3. **后端任务注册表同步** — `DWS_RETENTION_CLEANUP` / `DWS_MV_REFRESH_FINANCE_DAILY` / `DWS_MV_REFRESH_ASSISTANT_DAILY` 已替换为 `DWS_MAINTENANCE`；不常用任务标记为 `is_common=False`（DWD_QUALITY_CHECK, DWS_ML_MANUAL_IMPORT, DWS_MAINTENANCE, 全部 UTILITY 任务）
+4. **fetch_before_verify 范围修正** — 前端限制为仅 `verify_only` 模式显示
+5. **ods_use_local_json CLI 映射** — `cli_builder.py` 添加 `--data-source offline` 生成逻辑
+6. **DWD 表选择移入 TaskSelector** — 从独立 DwdTableSelector Card 移入 TaskSelector 内部，作为 DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS 的子选项
+7. **dwd_only_tables 生效** — `task_executor._run_subprocess` 新增 `extra_env` 参数，注入 `DWD_ONLY_TABLES` 环境变量
+8. **后端 sync-check 端点** — 新增 `GET /api/tasks/sync-check`，通过子进程调用 ETL 获取真实任务列表并对比差异
+9. **前端 API 层更新** — `tasks.ts` 已重写，新增 `fetchFlows()`, `checkTaskSync()`, `fetchDwdTablesRich()`, 以及类型定义 `FlowDef`, `ProcessingModeDef`, `SyncCheckResult`, `DwdTableItem`
+
+### 当前正在进行的重构（被截断）：
+
+用户要求 4 项重大改造：
+
+**A. TaskSelector 按业务域全链路展示（最重要，核心改造）**
+- 当前问题：DWD 层只有 `DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS` 一个通用任务，导致业务域下 ODS → DWD 断层
+- 目标交互：每个业务域（如"助教"）下展示完整链路：ODS 任务 → DWD 表（该域的） → DWS/INDEX 任务
+- DWD 表作为该域的"中间环节"自然嵌入，选中 DWD 表 = 过滤 DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS 的装载范围
+- 后端数据已就绪：`TaskDefinition` 有 `domain` 和 `layer` 字段，`DwdTableDefinition` 也有 `domain` 字段，两者的 domain 值一致（助教、结算、台桌、会员、商品、团购、库存、财务、指数、工具、通用）
+- **尚未实现**——`TaskSelector.tsx` 需要完全重写
+
+**B. 同步检查 UI**
+- 后端端点已完成（`/api/tasks/sync-check`）
+- 前端 API 调用已完成（`checkTaskSync()`）
+- **尚未实现**——需要在任务选择 Card 的 title 旁边加同步状态指示器，有差异时显示警告 Badge，点击打开 Modal/新页面展示差异详情
+
+**C. 任务选择按钮优化**
+- **尚未实现**——需要在"全选"前加"全选常用"按钮（只选 `is_common=true` 的任务），"反选"后加"清空"按钮
+
+**D. Flow 定义从 API 动态加载**
+- 后端端点已存在（`GET /api/tasks/flows`）
+- 前端 API 调用已完成（`fetchFlows()`）
+- **尚未实现**——`TaskConfig.tsx` 中的 `FLOW_DEFINITIONS` 和 `PROCESSING_MODES` 需要改为从 API 加载，本地定义作 fallback
+
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  * 重写 `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`：按业务域全链路展示（ODS 任务 → DWD 表 → DWS/INDEX 任务），每个域一个 Collapse 面板，内部按层分组显示
+  * 在 TaskSelector 中集成同步检查：title 旁加 Badge，点击展示差异 Modal
+  * 在 TaskSelector 中添加"全选常用"和"清空"按钮
+  * 修改 `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`：将 `FLOW_DEFINITIONS` 和 `PROCESSING_MODES` 改为从 `fetchFlows()` API 动态加载，本地定义作 fallback；确保 TaskSelector 的 props 传递正确
+  * 构建验证：`pnpm run build`（cwd: `apps/admin-web`）
+
+- **FILEPATHS**: 
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`（已完成更新）
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`
+  - `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py`（已完成 sync-check 端点）
+  - `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py`（已完成 is_common + DWS_MAINTENANCE）
+  - `apps/backend/app/services/cli_builder.py`（已完成 ods_use_local_json 映射）
+  - `apps/backend/app/services/task_executor.py`（已完成 extra_env 注入）
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 后端用 `uv run` 启动（不是直接 `python`）
+- 前端用 `pnpm` 管理
+- 后端进程运行在端口 8000（`uv run uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000`，cwd: `apps/backend`）
+- 前端进程运行在端口 5174（`pnpm run dev`，cwd: `apps/admin-web`）
+- ETL 项目实际路径是 `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/`
+- 脚本执行规范：优先编写 Python 脚本再执行，避免 PowerShell 复杂逻辑
+- `skip-quality` 参数在 ETL CLI 中不存在，已从前端移除
+- 连接器和 Store ID 的交互是 TreeSelect 树形多选（已实现）
+- pnpm build 需要 `Set-Location apps\admin-web; pnpm run build 2>&1`（cwd 参数在此环境中不可靠）
+- 已有测试 bug：`test_cli_args.py::TestBuildCliOverrides::test_data_source_online_sets_run_key` 失败（`force_full` 属性缺失），非本次修改引起
+- `--overlap-seconds` 默认值不一致（CLI 3600 vs 前端 600）是有意的，保持现状
+- DWS/INDEX 层校验被跳过是设计如此（verifier 未实现），业务任务正常执行
+- 业务域全链路交互：每个域（如助教）应包含 ODS → DWD 表 → DWS/INDEX 的完整路径，DWD 表作为中间环节嵌入
+
+---
+
+## Files to read
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`
+- `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py`
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. - 加一个自动化检查脚本（比如 CI 中对比两边的任务列表），避免手动同步遗漏。这个好，加入这个功能，放在 任务选择 title 旁边，若有差异则提醒。点击后打开新页面展示差异。- 任务选择 全选之前加入按钮：全选常用任务。反选后面加入按钮 清空。- 把前端的 FLOW_DEFINITIONS 改为从 API 动态加载，本地定义仅作 fallback。- 现在的交互还是不对：如果按照现在的方案，以业务场景分类，则每一层都应包含 ODS - DWD - DWS（index）全路径。比如助教类，就会有从ODS一直到DWS和index的全部相关任务。所以，DWD方面还要优化，这样的交互应该是合理的吧？
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. - 加一个自动化检查脚本（比如 CI 中对比两边的任务列表），避免手动同步遗漏。这个好，加入这个功能，放在 任务选择 title 旁边，若有差异则提醒。点击后打开新页面展示差异。- 任务选择 全选之前加入按钮：全选常用任务。反选后面加入按钮 清空。- 把前端的 FLOW_DEFINITIONS 改为从 API 动态加载，本地定义仅作 fallback。- 现在的交互还是不对：如果按照现在的方案，以业务场景分类，则每一层都应包含 ODS - DWD - DWS（index）全路径。比如助教类，就会有从ODS一直到DWS和index的全部相关任务。所以，DWD方面还要优化，这样的交互应该是合理的吧？
+5. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:miniprogram, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+8. 把"DWD 表选择"从独立的 DwdTableSelector 改为 DWD 任务卡片内的"表过滤"子选项，并且真正让它生效。这个方案OK。并在修改后，再思考下，页面如何优化布局。其他的这些问题，分别给出你的参考意见。
+9. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:miniprogram, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+10. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. 任务选择 和 DWD 表选择 从功能的表达上看，是不是有点问题？如果有DWD表选择，也应该有ODS表选择。但表选择和DWD的任务是不是又有些冲突？另外，之前调试是否忽略了一些问题，回忆一下？
+13. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+14. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+15. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+16. 还有哪些内容不存在（任务、参数、配置）？都帮我检查下。
+17. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+18. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 10 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_085009.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-085009] 2026-02-19 08:50:09 +0800
+  - summary: 我注释了一些.gitignore的内容，我希望在git上，对一些重要的配置，环境变量，输出和文档做一个留存。但服务器上用不到这些，帮我为服务器，编辑一个.gitignore文件。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我注释了一些.gitignore的内容，我希望在git上，对一些重要的配置，环境变量，输出和文档做一个留存。但服务器上用不到这些，帮我为服务器，编辑一个.gitignore文件。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_085404.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-085404] 2026-02-19 08:54:04 +0800
+  - summary: server-exclude.txt还有些文档和导出目录，没列全吧？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+server-exclude.txt还有些文档和导出目录，没列全吧？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_085846.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-085846] 2026-02-19 08:58:46 +0800
+  - summary: git是否支持对应分支做.gitignore文件区分？main分支就能提交干净的仓库了，方便在线环境
+  - prompt:
+```text
+git是否支持对应分支做.gitignore文件区分？main分支就能提交干净的仓库了，方便在线环境
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_090613.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-090613] 2026-02-19 09:06:13 +0800
+  - summary: merge 时需要注意 .gitignore 的冲突处理。这个能通过脚本等工具实现么？手动每次都注意不太现实。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+merge 时需要注意 .gitignore 的冲突处理。这个能通过脚本等工具实现么？手动每次都注意不太现实。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_090811.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-090811] 2026-02-19 09:08:11 +0800
+  - summary: 统一 .gitignore + skip-worktree的方案吧。写入文档中。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+统一 .gitignore + skip-worktree的方案吧。写入文档中。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_091409.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-091409] 2026-02-19 09:14:09 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_091747.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-091747] 2026-02-19 09:17:47 +0800
+  - summary: 我并没有发现有改变啊？没有编译么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我并没有发现有改变啊？没有编译么？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_091837.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-091837] 2026-02-19 09:18:37 +0800
+  - summary: 另外，小程序的测试版的发布如何操作？是否已经在文档中了？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+另外，小程序的测试版的发布如何操作？是否已经在文档中了？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_092124.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-092124] 2026-02-19 09:21:24 +0800
+  - summary: apps\pg_mcp_server.py是一个MCP服务。小程序下会调用阿里云百炼的AI应用，应用会读取服务器上数据库，本服务器会通过MCP进行承载。帮我整合进项目中，合适的目录下。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+apps\pg_mcp_server.py是一个MCP服务。小程序下会调用阿里云百炼的AI应用，应用会读取服务器上数据库，本服务器会通过MCP进行承载。帮我整合进项目中，合适的目录下。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_092150.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-092150] 2026-02-19 09:21:50 +0800
+  - summary: 你自己检查下...
+  - prompt:
+```text
+你自己检查下...
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_092233.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-092233] 2026-02-19 09:22:33 +0800
+  - summary: 使用MCP
+  - prompt:
+```text
+使用MCP
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_092311.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-092311] 2026-02-19 09:23:11 +0800
+  - summary: 加载需要时间，现在看看
+  - prompt:
+```text
+加载需要时间，现在看看
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_092530.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-092530] 2026-02-19 09:25:30 +0800
+  - summary: apps\pg_mcp_server.py文件有内容了，但数据库名称貌似是错的，帮我检查下还有什么问题。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+apps\pg_mcp_server.py文件有内容了，但数据库名称貌似是错的，帮我检查下还有什么问题。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_092706.md

@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+- [P20260219-092706] 2026-02-19 09:27:06 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Admin-web…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Admin-web 同步检查与 Bug 修复（ETL 重构后）
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1 (from earlier context transfer)
+- **DETAILS**: 在大量 ETL 重构后，全面检查并修复了 admin-web 前端与后端的同步问题。共 12 处修复，构建验证通过。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/backend/app/config.py`, `apps/backend/app/services/cli_builder.py`, `apps/backend/app/schemas/tasks.py`, `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/components/ScheduleTab.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/store/authStore.ts`, `apps/admin-web/vite.config.ts`
+
+## TASK 2: ETL 执行深度分析 + Bug 修复
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 2-6 (from earlier context transfer)
+- **DETAILS**: 用户从 admin-web 执行 api_full 任务，16.8 秒就"完成"，用户质疑。深度分析发现 5 个关键问题并全部修复。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/ods/ods_json_archive_task.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/verification/base_verifier.py`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`, `scripts/ops/fix_admin_site_id.py`
+
+## TASK 3: Admin-web 全面 UI 优化（4 项重大改造）
+
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: 7-12 (across context transfers), plus current conversation
+- **DETAILS**: 用户要求 4 项重大改造。代码已全部写入磁盘，`pnpm run build` 构建通过，TypeScript 诊断无错误。但通过 Playwright 浏览器验证发现：**页面仍然渲染旧版 TaskSelector**——缺少"全选常用"/"清空"按钮、缺少层级 Tag 标签（ODS/DWD/DWS）、缺少同步检查按钮、缺少 DWD 表过滤区块。
+
+### 已完成的代码改动（文件已写入磁盘，build 通过）：
+
+**A. TaskSelector 按业务域全链路展示（核心改造）** — `TaskSelector.tsx` 已完全重写：
+- 每个业务域一个 Collapse 面板，内部按层（ODS → DWD → DWS → INDEX）分组，每层有彩色 Tag 标签
+- DWD 表过滤自然嵌入对应域的 DWD 层下方（绿色背景区块，含维度标签）
+- `buildDomainGroups()` 函数按 `layer` 字段分组，`LAYER_ORDER`/`LAYER_LABELS`/`LAYER_COLORS`/`DOMAIN_ORDER` 常量控制排序和显示
+
+**B. 同步检查 UI** — 已实现：
+- 工具栏右侧显示同步状态（`SyncOutlined`/`CheckCircleOutlined`/`WarningOutlined` 按钮）
+- 首次加载自动调用 `checkTaskSync()`
+- 有差异时点击打开 Modal 展示 backend_only / etl_only 列表
+
+**C. 全选常用 / 清空按钮** — 已实现：
+- 工具栏：全选常用 → 全选 → 反选 → 清空（4 个按钮）
+- `allCommonCodes` 计算 `is_common=true` 的任务
+
+**D. Flow 定义从 API 动态加载** — 已实现：
+- `TaskConfig.tsx` 中 `FLOW_DEFINITIONS` 改为 `FALLBACK_FLOWS`，`PROCESSING_MODES` 改为 `FALLBACK_PROCESSING_MODES`
+- 组件内 `useEffect` 调用 `fetchFlows()` 加载，API 不可用时使用 fallback
+- `layers` 派生改为 `flowDefs[flow]?.layers ?? []`
+- Flow Card title 加载中显示 `<Spin size="small" />`
+- 处理模式已验证从 API 加载成功（页面显示"仅增量处理"而非 fallback 的"仅增量"）
+
+**E. 类型定义更新** — 已完成：
+- `types/index.ts` 中 `TaskDefinition` 添加 `layer: string` 字段
+- `types/index.ts` 中新增 `DwdTableItem` 接口
+- `api/tasks.ts` 中新增 `fetchDwdTablesRich()`, `fetchFlows()`, `checkTaskSync()` 及类型 `DwdTableItem`, `FlowDef`, `ProcessingModeDef`, `SyncCheckResult`
+
+### 当前问题（需要排查）：
+
+**Vite 渲染的仍是旧版 TaskSelector**。已尝试：
+1. 清除 `.vite` 缓存目录并重启 dev server
+2. 重启后页面仍然只显示"全选"和"反选"（没有"全选常用"和"清空"），没有层级 Tag，没有同步检查按钮
+
+可能原因：
+- git 显示 `TaskSelector.tsx` 的 hash 与 HEAD commit 一致（`924d2a67...`），说明磁盘文件和 HEAD commit 内容相同
+- HEAD commit `4eac07d`（"在准备环境前提交次全部更改"）是用户在上一轮对话结束时做的全量 commit
+- **关键发现**：`git show HEAD:apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx` 输出的中文是乱码（PowerShell 编码问题），无法确认 HEAD 中的版本是新版还是旧版
+- 但 `git hash-object` 和 `git ls-tree` 显示磁盘文件 hash 与 HEAD 一致，说明 `fsWrite` 写入的内容可能和 HEAD 中的旧版本完全一样——即 **fsWrite 可能没有成功覆盖文件**，或者上一轮对话中已经写入了新版本并被 commit
+
+**需要验证**：用 `readFile` 读取 `TaskSelector.tsx` 的完整内容，确认磁盘上是否真的是新版（含 `handleSelectCommon`、`LAYER_ORDER`、`checkTaskSync` 等）。如果磁盘上确实是新版但 Vite 不渲染，可能是 TypeScript 编译缓存问题，需要清除 `tsconfig.tsbuildinfo` 后重新 build。
+
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  1. 读取 `TaskSelector.tsx` 完整内容，确认是否包含新版代码（`handleSelectCommon`、`LAYER_LABELS`、`renderDwdTableFilter`、`handleSyncCheck`）
+  2. 如果文件是新版但 Vite 不渲染：删除 `apps/admin-web/node_modules/.vite` 和 `apps/admin-web/tsconfig.tsbuildinfo`，重启 dev server
+  3. 如果文件是旧版：需要重新写入 TaskSelector.tsx（新版代码在本 summary 的 TASK 3 描述中有完整设计）
+  4. 用 Playwright 浏览器验证：登录后检查任务选择区域是否有"全选常用"/"清空"按钮、层级 Tag、同步检查按钮
+  5. 验证 DWD 表过滤：选中 `DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS` 后，各域下应出现绿色 DWD 表过滤区块
+
+- **FILEPATHS**:
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx` — 核心文件，需要验证/重写
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx` — 已改动（Flow 动态加载）
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts` — 已改动（新增 API 函数）
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts` — 已改动（新增 layer 字段和 DwdTableItem）
+  - `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py` — 已改动（新增 sync-check 端点）
+  - `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py` — 参考数据（任务定义、DWD 表定义、domain/layer 字段）
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 后端用 `uv run` 启动（不是直接 `python`）
+- 前端用 `pnpm` 管理
+- 后端进程运行在端口 8000（`uv run uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000`，cwd: `apps/backend`）
+- 前端进程运行在端口 5174（`pnpm run dev`，cwd: `apps/admin-web`）
+- ETL 项目实际路径是 `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/`
+- 脚本执行规范：优先编写 Python 脚本再执行，避免 PowerShell 复杂逻辑
+- pnpm build 命令：`Set-Location apps\admin-web; pnpm run build 2>&1`
+- 已有测试 bug：`test_cli_args.py::TestBuildCliOverrides::test_data_source_online_sets_run_key` 失败（`force_full` 属性缺失），非本次修改引起
+- `--overlap-seconds` 默认值不一致（CLI 3600 vs 前端 600）是有意的，保持现状
+- DWS/INDEX 层校验被跳过是设计如此（verifier 未实现），业务任务正常执行
+- 业务域全链路交互：每个域（如助教）应包含 ODS → DWD 表 → DWS/INDEX 的完整路径
+- 用户要求用 MCP Playwright 工具来验证页面效果
+- Vite 缓存清除：需要删除 `apps/admin-web/node_modules/.vite` 目录
+
+---
+
+## Files to read
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`
+- `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 加载需要时间，现在看看
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 加载需要时间，现在看看
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. 使用MCP
+8. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+9. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+10. 你自己检查下...
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+13. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+14. 我并没有发现有改变啊？没有编译么？
+15. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (dir:admin-web, dir:backend). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+16. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+17. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+18. 继续
+19. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (dir:admin-web, dir:backend). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+20. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+21. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 12 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_093715.md

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+- [P20260219-093715] 2026-02-19 09:37:15 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Admin-web…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Admin-web 同步检查与 Bug 修复（ETL 重构后）
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1 (from earlier context transfer)
+- **DETAILS**: 在大量 ETL 重构后，全面检查并修复了 admin-web 前端与后端的同步问题。共 12 处修复，构建验证通过。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/backend/app/config.py`, `apps/backend/app/services/cli_builder.py`, `apps/backend/app/schemas/tasks.py`, `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/components/ScheduleTab.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/store/authStore.ts`, `apps/admin-web/vite.config.ts`
+
+## TASK 2: ETL 执行深度分析 + Bug 修复
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 2-6 (from earlier context transfer)
+- **DETAILS**: 用户从 admin-web 执行 api_full 任务，16.8 秒就"完成"，用户质疑。深度分析发现 5 个关键问题并全部修复。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/ods/ods_json_archive_task.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/verification/base_verifier.py`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`, `scripts/ops/fix_admin_site_id.py`
+
+## TASK 3: Admin-web 全面 UI 优化（4 项重大改造）
+
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: 7-12 (across context transfers), plus current conversation
+- **DETAILS**: 用户要求 4 项重大改造。经过多轮排查，发现核心问题是 `fsWrite`/`readFile` 工具操作的是内存缓存而非磁盘文件。最终使用 `mcp_filesystem_write_file` 直接写入磁盘成功。
+
+### 关键发现（重要教训）
+- `readFile` 和 `fsWrite` 工具可能操作内存缓存，不一定反映磁盘真实内容
+- 必须用 `mcp_filesystem_read_text_file` / `mcp_filesystem_write_file` 来确保磁盘读写
+- 用 `Select-String`（PowerShell）或 `grep` 验证磁盘文件内容是可靠的
+
+### 已完成并验证生效的改动：
+
+**A. TaskSelector 按业务域全链路展示（核心改造）** ✅ 已通过 Playwright 验证：
+- 每个业务域一个 Collapse 面板，内部按层（ODS → DWD → DWS → INDEX）分组
+- 每层有彩色 Tag 标签（蓝色 ODS 抽取、绿色 DWD 装载、橙色 DWS 汇总、紫色 DWS 指数）
+- `buildDomainGroups()` 函数按 `layer` 字段分组
+- 域排序：助教→结算→台桌→会员→商品→团购→库存→财务→指数→通用→工具
+- 文件通过 `mcp_filesystem_write_file` 写入 `C:\NeoZQYY\apps\admin-web\src\components\TaskSelector.tsx`
+
+**B. 同步检查 UI** ✅ 已通过 Playwright 验证（显示绿色"已同步"按钮）：
+- 工具栏右侧显示同步状态按钮
+- 首次加载自动调用 `checkTaskSync()`
+- 有差异时点击打开 Modal 展示 backend_only / etl_only 列表
+
+**C. 全选常用 / 清空按钮** ✅ 已通过 Playwright 验证：
+- 工具栏：全选常用 → 全选 → 反选 → 清空（4 个按钮）
+
+**D. Flow 定义从 API 动态加载** ✅ 已在之前验证：
+- `TaskConfig.tsx` 中 `FALLBACK_FLOWS` / `FALLBACK_PROCESSING_MODES` 作为兜底
+- 组件内 `useEffect` 调用 `fetchFlows()` 加载
+- 处理模式从 API 加载成功（页面显示"仅增量处理"而非 fallback 的"仅增量"）
+
+### 待验证/待完成：
+
+1. **切换到 `api_full` Flow 验证 DWS/INDEX 层显示** — 当前 Flow 是 `api_ods_dwd`（只显示 ODS 层），需要点击 `api_full` radio 验证助教域下是否同时显示 ODS 抽取 + DWS 汇总 + DWS 指数层
+2. **DWD 表过滤验证** — 选中 `DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS` 后，各域下应出现绿色 DWD 表过滤区块（含维度标签）
+3. **pnpm build 验证** — 需要运行 `pnpm run build` 确认 TypeScript 编译通过
+4. **端口问题** — 当前 Vite dev server 运行在端口 5173（不是之前的 5174），可能有旧进程占用 5173 导致端口冲突
+
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  1. 点击 `api_full` radio（ref=e508），验证 DWS/INDEX 层任务和层级 Tag 正确显示
+  2. 选中 `DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS`，验证 DWD 表过滤区块出现
+  3. 运行 `pnpm run build`（cwd: `apps/admin-web`）确认编译通过
+  4. 截图留存最终效果
+
+- **FILEPATHS**:
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx` — 核心文件，已通过 MCP filesystem 写入磁盘
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx` — Flow 动态加载（磁盘状态需用 mcp_filesystem 确认）
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts` — 新增 API 函数（磁盘状态需用 mcp_filesystem 确认）
+  - `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts` — 新增 layer 字段和 DwdTableItem（磁盘状态需用 mcp_filesystem 确认）
+  - `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py` — 新增 sync-check 端点
+  - `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py` — 任务定义、DWD 表定义
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 后端用 `uv run` 启动（不是直接 `python`）
+- 前端用 `pnpm` 管理
+- 后端进程运行在端口 8000（`uv run uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000`，cwd: `apps/backend`）
+- 前端进程运行在端口 5173 或 5174（`pnpm run dev`，cwd: `apps/admin-web`）
+- 脚本执行规范：优先编写 Python 脚本再执行，避免 PowerShell 复杂逻辑
+- pnpm build 命令：`Set-Location apps\admin-web; pnpm run build 2>&1`
+- **关键教训**：`readFile`/`fsWrite` 可能操作内存缓存而非磁盘。必须用 `mcp_filesystem_read_text_file` / `mcp_filesystem_write_file` 确保磁盘读写，用 `Select-String` 或 `grep` 验证
+- 用户要求用 MCP Playwright 工具来验证页面效果
+- 当前 Playwright 浏览器打开在 `http://localhost:5173/`，已登录
+- 当前后端进程 processId=3 运行中，前端进程 processId=8 运行中
+
+---
+
+## Files to read
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`
+- `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 2 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_094539.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-094539] 2026-02-19 09:45:39 +0800
+  - summary: DWD 装载 应该在DWS上面吧？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+DWD 装载 应该在DWS上面吧？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_094657.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-094657] 2026-02-19 09:46:57 +0800
+  - summary: DWD 装载 应该在DWS上面吧？当前情况，DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS DWD 装载 没必要存在了吧？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+DWD 装载 应该在DWS上面吧？当前情况，DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS DWD 装载 没必要存在了吧？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_102829.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-102829] 2026-02-19 10:28:29 +0800
+  - summary: 还有，已经登录的状态，刷新为什么还要重新登录？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+还有，已经登录的状态，刷新为什么还要重新登录？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_103034.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-103034] 2026-02-19 10:30:34 +0800
+  - summary: git操作：- 现在的代码提交。- 将dev同步到test和master
+  - prompt:
+```text
+git操作：- 现在的代码提交。- 将dev同步到test和master
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_103138.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-103138] 2026-02-19 10:31:38 +0800
+  - summary: 指数有5-6个，为什么任务只有4个？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+指数有5-6个，为什么任务只有4个？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_164401.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-164401] 2026-02-19 16:44:01 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_164613.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-164613] 2026-02-19 16:46:13 +0800
+  - summary: 启动
+  - prompt:
+```text
+启动
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_164932.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-164932] 2026-02-19 16:49:32 +0800
+  - summary: 为什么docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md打不开了
+  - prompt:
+```text
+为什么docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md打不开了
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_165114.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-165114] 2026-02-19 16:51:14 +0800
+  - summary: 启动管理端
+  - prompt:
+```text
+启动管理端
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_165323.md

@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+- [P20260219-165323] 2026-02-19 16:53:23 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Git commi…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Git commit and branch sync (dev → test → master)
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 1 ("git操作：现在的代码提交。将dev同步到test和master"), 2 ("终止webserver.进行git操作后再开启"), 3 ("继续")
+
+**DETAILS**:
+- Committed all staged changes on `dev` branch with hash `254ccb1e` - commit message: "feat: TaskSelector v2 全链路展示 + 同步检查 + MCP Server + 服务器 Git 排除"
+- Changes included: admin-web TaskSelector v2 refactor, backend new APIs (/sync-check, /flows), new apps/mcp-server module, scripts/server/ Git exclude setup, docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md updates, pyproject.toml workspace member addition
+- Branch sync was extremely difficult due to Kiro IDE locking `.kiro/specs/` and `apps/admin-web/src/` directories
+- Killed node processes, tried `git checkout --force`, `git merge`, `git reset --hard` - all failed due to Permission denied on `.kiro/` dirs
+- Final solution: used `git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/dev` to switch HEAD pointer, then `git branch -f test 254ccb1e` and `git branch -f master 254ccb1e` to force-move branch pointers without checkout
+- All three branches confirmed pointing to `254ccb1e`
+- Successfully pushed all three branches to remote `origin`
+- After push, `git reset --hard 254ccb1e` was needed to fix working tree corruption caused by partial reset operations
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `scripts/ops/sync_branches.py` (created but not needed - branch -f approach worked)
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`
+- `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py`
+- `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`
+- `pyproject.toml`
+- `apps/mcp-server/`
+- `scripts/server/`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 2: Start admin-web and backend dev servers
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 4 ("启动"), 5 ("启动管理端")
+
+**DETAILS**:
+- admin-web (Vite) successfully started on `http://localhost:5173/` (ProcessId: 1, pnpm dev in apps/admin-web)
+- Backend initially failed with `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'fastapi'`
+- Ran `uv sync --all-packages` which installed 20 packages (fastapi deps, mcp, psycopg, etc.)
+- Started backend again with `uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000` (ProcessId: 4)
+- **Have NOT yet confirmed backend started successfully** - need to check ProcessId 4 output
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+- Check `getProcessOutput` for ProcessId 4 to confirm backend is running
+- If backend has errors, troubleshoot and fix
+- Report final status to user
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `apps/admin-web/package.json`
+- `apps/backend/app/main.py`
+
+---
+
+## TASK 3: LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md not opening
+
+**STATUS**: done
+
+**USER QUERIES**: 6 ("为什么docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md打不开了")
+
+**DETAILS**:
+- File exists on disk and content is readable (verified with `Test-Path` and `readFile`)
+- Issue was Kiro editor tab cache - the `git reset --hard` operations temporarily deleted/recreated files, causing stale editor state
+- Advised user to close and reopen the file tab or use "Revert File" command
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 脚本执行规范：优先编写 Python 脚本再执行，避免 PowerShell 复杂逻辑
+- 一次性运维脚本放 `scripts/ops/`
+- Governance: 高风险变更需要审计（audit reminder已触发多次，用户未手动执行 /audit）
+- When Kiro locks directories (.kiro/, apps/admin-web/src/), use `git branch -f` or `git symbolic-ref` instead of checkout/merge
+
+## Files to read:
+- `apps/backend/app/main.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 启动管理端
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 启动管理端
+5. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+8. 为什么docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md打不开了
+9. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+10. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. 启动
+13. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:etl, dir:miniprogram, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+14. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+15. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+16. 继续
+17. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+18. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+19. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+20. 终止webserver.进行git操作后再开启
+21. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+22. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+23. git操作：- 现在的代码提交。- 将dev同步到test和master
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 12 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_165528.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-165528] 2026-02-19 16:55:28 +0800
+  - summary: 为什么我的版本回滚了很多很多，你操作git的时候是不是出问题了，为我排查
+  - prompt:
+```text
+为什么我的版本回滚了很多很多，你操作git的时候是不是出问题了，为我排查
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_170021.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-170021] 2026-02-19 17:00:21 +0800
+  - summary: 回滚到这个提交的版本：4eac07da47700e62526e5ce8d9ee73a129dbb1bc
+  - prompt:
+```text
+回滚到这个提交的版本：4eac07da47700e62526e5ce8d9ee73a129dbb1bc
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_170205.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-170205] 2026-02-19 17:02:05 +0800
+  - summary: 启动后台看一眼。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+启动后台看一眼。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_170849.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-170849] 2026-02-19 17:08:49 +0800
+  - summary: 方案1.你要遍历这个kiro客户端的所有对话，恢复254ccb1之后，做的所有改动，不要漏了。有些对话时间跨度很长，你要对每条消息遍历处理。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+方案1.你要遍历这个kiro客户端的所有对话，恢复254ccb1之后，做的所有改动，不要漏了。有些对话时间跨度很长，你要对每条消息遍历处理。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_171022.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-171022] 2026-02-19 17:10:22 +0800
+  - summary: 启动，我看下。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+启动，我看下。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_171141.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-171141] 2026-02-19 17:11:41 +0800
+  - summary: 其他对话，也有改动吧，读取所有对话，所有修改，为我复原到最新的状态。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+其他对话，也有改动吧，读取所有对话，所有修改，为我复原到最新的状态。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_171759.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-171759] 2026-02-19 17:17:59 +0800
+  - summary: C:\Users\Administrator\Downloads\RECOVERY这个目录下，是最近的几次和kiro的对话，看下有没有遗漏的，待恢复内容？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+C:\Users\Administrator\Downloads\RECOVERY这个目录下，是最近的几次和kiro的对话，看下有没有遗漏的，待恢复内容？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_172529.md

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+- [P20260219-172529] 2026-02-19 17:25:29 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Git rollb…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Git rollback and recovery investigation
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: Previous conversation (see context transfer)
+- **DETAILS**: User felt code had regressed. Investigation via `git reflog` showed that during git branch sync operations, `git checkout test` switched working tree to `ded6dfb` (initial commit). User first rolled back to `4eac07d`, then realized `254ccb1` contained all latest work. Recovered to `254ccb1` via `git reset --hard`.
+- **FILEPATHS**: N/A (git operations only)
+
+---
+
+## TASK 2: Scan RECOVERY directory for missing changes across Kiro conversations
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1 ("C:\Users\Administrator\Downloads\RECOVERY这个目录下，是最近的几次和kiro的对话，看下有没有遗漏的，待恢复内容？")
+- **DETAILS**: User provided exported Kiro conversation files in `C:\Users\Administrator\Downloads\RECOVERY\`. Wrote `scripts/ops/scan_recovery.py` to scan all 8 conversation files for code edits, then `scripts/ops/verify_recovery.py` to systematically verify every change mentioned in conversations against current `254ccb1` code.
+
+**8 conversation files analyzed:**
+1. `- devtestmaster.md` — Git branch sync (commit + push). No code changes.
+2. `conversation.md` — MCP Server integration (`apps/pg_mcp_server.py` → `apps/mcp-server/server.py`). All changes present ✅
+3. `docsdeployment.md` — Deployment docs + MVP + WeChat message push. Most present, 3 docs "missing" but merged into LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md ✅
+4. `Exit Code 0 Continued Continued.md` — Admin-web UI overhaul (TaskSelector v2 rewrite, sync check, buttons). All present ✅
+5. `Exit Code 0 Continued Continued Continued.md` — Continuation of UI overhaul, Vite cache issues discovered. All present ✅
+6. `Exit Code 0 Continued Continued Continued Continue.md` — Final verification of 4 UI improvements via Playwright. All present ✅
+7. `Exit Code 0 Continued Continued Continued Continue1.md` — DWD ordering fix, DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS auto-inject, hydrate guard, index task count question. All present ✅
+8. `New Session Continued.md` — Current conversation (git ops + recovery). No new code changes.
+
+**Verification results:**
+- **All code changes are present in `254ccb1`** ✅ — Every feature (TaskSelector v2, sync check, DWD ordering, hydrate guard, MCP server, MVP routes, wx_callback, etc.)
+- **Only 3 "missing" files**: `docs/deployment/ENV-MANAGEMENT.md`, `docs/deployment/PRE-TEST-VERIFICATION.md`, `docs/deployment/MINIPROGRAM-RELEASE.md` — but these were source documents that were explicitly merged into `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md` (which exists and is 613 lines). No content is actually lost.
+- **`apps/miniprogram/miniprogram/config.ts`** appeared missing but actually exists at `apps/miniprogram/miniprogram/utils/config.ts` (tracked in `4eac07d`). Path discrepancy in conversation export.
+- **Current `git diff --stat HEAD`**: Only `.kiro/.last_prompt_id.json` (4 lines) and `uv.lock` (413 lines from `uv sync`) differ from `254ccb1`. No code drift.
+
+**Conclusion: `254ccb1` is confirmed complete. No changes need to be restored.**
+
+- **FILEPATHS**: 
+  - `scripts/ops/scan_recovery.py` (created, one-time use)
+  - `scripts/ops/verify_recovery.py` (created, one-time use)
+  - `scripts/ops/read_recovery.py` (created, one-time use)
+  - `scripts/ops/extract_missing_files.py` (created, one-time use)
+
+---
+
+## Git state summary
+
+- **Branch**: `dev` at `254ccb1` ("feat: TaskSelector v2 全链路展示 + 同步检查 + MCP Server + 服务器 Git 排除")
+- **All branches aligned**: `origin/dev`, `origin/test`, `origin/master`, local `test`, local `master` all at `254ccb1`
+- **Only 3 commits**: `ded6dfb` → `4eac07d` → `254ccb1`
+- **Working tree**: Clean except `.kiro/.last_prompt_id.json` and `uv.lock`
+- **Stash**: `stash@{0}` contains "temp: kiro prompt id"
+- **Untracked**: `docs/audit/prompt_logs/` (many), `scripts/ops/` (scan/verify/read/extract scripts), `task-selector-check.png`, `apps/admin-web/.vite/`
+
+## Dev servers
+
+- **admin-web (Vite)**: ProcessId 8, `pnpm dev` in `apps/admin-web`, running on `http://localhost:5173/`
+- **Backend (FastAPI)**: ProcessId 9, `uv run uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000` in `apps/backend`, running on `http://localhost:8000/`
+
+---
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 脚本执行规范：优先编写 Python 脚本再执行，避免 PowerShell 复杂逻辑
+- 一次性运维脚本放 `scripts/ops/`
+- 后端启动必须用 `uv run uvicorn ...`（不是直接 `uvicorn`），否则会用 conda 的 Python 导致 `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'fastapi'`
+- 前端用 `pnpm dev` 在 `apps/admin-web/` 目录
+- When Kiro locks directories (.kiro/, apps/admin-web/src/), use `git branch -f` or `git symbolic-ref` instead of checkout/merge
+- `254ccb1` is confirmed as the latest complete state — no changes are missing from any conversation
+- Governance: 高风险变更需要审计，用户未手动执行 /audit
+- `readFile`/`fsWrite` 可能操作内存缓存而非磁盘。必须用 `mcp_filesystem_read_text_file` / `mcp_filesystem_write_file` 确保磁盘读写（历史教训）
+
+## Files to read
+- `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`
+- `apps/backend/app/main.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. C:\Users\Administrator\Downloads\RECOVERY这个目录下，是最近的几次和kiro的对话，看下有没有遗漏的，待恢复内容？
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. C:\Users\Administrator\Downloads\RECOVERY这个目录下，是最近的几次和kiro的对话，看下有没有遗漏的，待恢复内容？
+5. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 4 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_182200.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-182200] 2026-02-19 18:22:00 +0800
+  - summary: 好，把这个最新的版本，同步到test和master
+  - prompt:
+```text
+好，把这个最新的版本，同步到test和master
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_184405.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-184405] 2026-02-19 18:44:05 +0800
+  - summary: 再试下，需要认证给我入口。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+再试下，需要认证给我入口。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_184625.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-184625] 2026-02-19 18:46:25 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_185401.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-185401] 2026-02-19 18:54:01 +0800
+  - summary: 把说明，放在任务说明上。不然会出现误解。另外，任务选择，将DWD的交互逻辑一致化，不要现在的选中是过滤排除，和上下选项交互一致。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+把说明，放在任务说明上。不然会出现误解。另外，任务选择，将DWD的交互逻辑一致化，不要现在的选中是过滤排除，和上下选项交互一致。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_185528.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-185528] 2026-02-19 18:55:28 +0800
+  - summary: - 把DWS的说明，放在任务说明上。不然会出现误解。- 任务选择，修改DWD的选中交互逻辑，和上下一致化，不要现在的选中是过滤排除，很容易误解。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+- 把DWS的说明，放在任务说明上。不然会出现误解。- 任务选择，修改DWD的选中交互逻辑，和上下一致化，不要现在的选中是过滤排除，很容易误解。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_190549.md

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+- [P20260219-190549] 2026-02-19 19:05:49 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Admin-web…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Admin-web 同步检查与 Bug 修复（ETL 重构后）
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: from earlier context transfer
+- **DETAILS**: 在大量 ETL 重构后，全面检查并修复了 admin-web 前端与后端的同步问题。共 12 处修复，构建验证通过。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/backend/app/config.py`, `apps/backend/app/services/cli_builder.py`, `apps/backend/app/schemas/tasks.py`, `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/components/ScheduleTab.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/store/authStore.ts`, `apps/admin-web/vite.config.ts`
+
+## TASK 2: ETL 执行深度分析 + Bug 修复
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: from earlier context transfer
+- **DETAILS**: 用户从 admin-web 执行 api_full 任务，16.8 秒就"完成"，深度分析发现 5 个关键问题并全部修复。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/ods/ods_json_archive_task.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/verification/base_verifier.py`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/LogViewer.tsx`, `scripts/ops/fix_admin_site_id.py`
+
+## TASK 3: Admin-web 全面 UI 优化（4 项重大改造）
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: from earlier context transfer
+- **DETAILS**: TaskSelector 按业务域全链路展示、同步检查 UI、全选常用/全选/反选/清空按钮、Flow 定义从 API 动态加载。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/api/tasks.ts`, `apps/admin-web/src/types/index.ts`, `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py`, `apps/backend/app/routers/tasks.py`
+
+## TASK 4: DWD 装载排序修复 + DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS 隐藏
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: from earlier context transfer
+- **DETAILS**: DWD 装载区块正确排在 ODS 和 DWS 之间，`DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS` 已隐藏。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`
+
+## TASK 5: 刷新后重新登录问题修复
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: from earlier context transfer
+- **DETAILS**: 加了 `hydrated` state 守卫，hydrate 完成前显示 Spin loading。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/admin-web/src/App.tsx`
+
+## TASK 6: 指数任务数量不匹配排查
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: from earlier context transfer + current conversation queries 1-2
+- **DETAILS**: 确认 4 个 INDEX 任务覆盖全部 6 个指数。`DWS_RELATION_INDEX`（`RelationIndexTask`）是复合任务，`execute()` 内部调用 `_calculate_rs()`、`_calculate_os()`、`_calculate_ms()`、`_calculate_ml()` 产出 RS/OS/MS/ML 四个子指数。设计合理，不需要改动。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/orchestration/task_registry.py`, `apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/tasks/dws/index/relation_index_task.py`
+
+## TASK 7: DWS 任务描述显示 + DWD 表选择正向勾选改造
+
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: current conversation query 3 ("把DWS的说明放在任务说明上" + "修改DWD的选中交互逻辑，和上下一致化")
+- **DETAILS**: 两个子改动：
+  - A. DWS/INDEX 层任务旁显示 description（ODS/DWD 不显示，避免冗余）— **已完成**
+  - B. DWD 表选择改为正向勾选（选中=装载，和 ODS/DWS checkbox 一致）— **已完成**
+  
+  具体已实施的改动：
+  1. `TaskSelector.tsx`：标题从"DWD 表过滤"改为"DWD 装载表"
+  2. `TaskSelector.tsx`：去掉"（未选 = 全部装载）"提示，改为始终显示 `n/n` 计数
+  3. `TaskSelector.tsx`：新增 useEffect，DWD 表数据加载后自动全选（正向勾选默认行为）
+  4. `TaskSelector.tsx`：只对 DWS/INDEX 层任务显示 description（条件 `t.layer === "DWS" || t.layer === "INDEX"`）
+  5. `TaskConfig.tsx`：`buildTaskConfig()` 中 `dwd_only_tables` 逻辑改为正向传递
+  6. `task_registry.py`（后端）：`DWS_RELATION_INDEX` 的 description 从"计算助教-客户关系指数"改为"产出 RS/OS/MS/ML 四个子指数"
+  
+  通过 Playwright 验证（`api_full` Flow）：
+  - ODS 层：不显示 description ✅
+  - DWS 层：显示 description（如"汇总助教每日业绩"）✅
+  - INDEX 层：`DWS_RELATION_INDEX` 显示"(产出 RS/OS/MS/ML 四个子指数)" ✅
+  - DWD 装载表：默认全选（所有 checkbox 为 checked）✅
+  - 标题显示"DWD 装载表" ✅
+  
+  构建通过（`pnpm run build` 成功）。
+
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  * 需要截图最终验证效果（上一次截图是改动前的，改动后还没截图确认）
+  * 清理临时文件：`tmp_taskselector.txt`、`tmp_taskconfig.txt`、`tmp_types.txt`、`task-selector-after-changes.png`
+  * 清理一次性脚本：`scripts/ops/patch_taskselector.py`、`scripts/ops/patch_taskconfig.py`、`scripts/ops/patch_dwd_autoselect.py`、`scripts/ops/patch_desc_filter.py`
+  * 后端 `task_registry.py` 改动需要重启后端服务才能生效（当前 Playwright 看到的 INDEX 描述是从后端 API 返回的，已经生效说明后端有 auto-reload）
+
+- **FILEPATHS**: `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`, `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`, `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 后端用 `uv run` 启动（不是直接 `python`）
+- 前端用 `pnpm` 管理
+- 后端进程运行在端口 8000（`uv run uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000`，cwd: `apps/backend`），processId=3
+- 前端进程运行在端口 5173（`pnpm run dev`，cwd: `apps/admin-web`），processId=8
+- 脚本执行规范：优先编写 Python 脚本再执行，避免 PowerShell 复杂逻辑
+- pnpm build 命令：`Set-Location apps\admin-web; pnpm run build 2>&1`
+- **关键教训**：前端 `apps/admin-web/src/` 目录有 EPERM 权限问题，`readFile`/`listDirectory` 无法直接访问。必须用 Python 脚本（`pathlib.Path.read_text/write_text` 带完整 Windows 路径）或 `git show HEAD:<path>` 来读写
+- 用户要求用 MCP Playwright 工具来验证页面效果
+- 当前 Playwright 浏览器打开在 `http://localhost:5173/`，已登录，当前选中 `api_full` Flow
+- ETL 侧文件路径：`apps/etl/pipelines/feiqiu/`（不是 `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/`，后者是旧路径但 fileSearch 仍能找到）
+
+## Files to read
+- `apps/admin-web/src/components/TaskSelector.tsx`（用 Python 脚本读取：`pathlib.Path(r'C:\NeoZQYY\apps\admin-web\src\components\TaskSelector.tsx').read_text('utf-8')`）
+- `apps/admin-web/src/pages/TaskConfig.tsx`（同上方式读取）
+- `apps/backend/app/services/task_registry.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. - 把DWS的说明，放在任务说明上。不然会出现误解。- 任务选择，修改DWD的选中交互逻辑，和上下一致化，不要现在的选中是过滤排除，很容易误解。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. - 把DWS的说明，放在任务说明上。不然会出现误解。- 任务选择，修改DWD的选中交互逻辑，和上下一致化，不要现在的选中是过滤排除，很容易误解。
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 4 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_192705.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-192705] 2026-02-19 19:27:05 +0800
+  - summary: Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks，在最终报告中，增加获取的JSON的获取数据的日期范围。内容在Python执行的报告中有提及，数据源是返回的JSON。完成后，将相应的内容，回填最新的任务报告。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks，在最终报告中，增加获取的JSON的获取数据的日期范围。内容在Python执行的报告中有提及，数据源是返回的JSON。完成后，将相应的内容，回填最新的任务报告。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_193212.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-193212] 2026-02-19 19:32:12 +0800
+  - summary: 更新迭代：Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks。需求：在最终报告中，增加获取的JSON的获取数据的日期范围。内容在Python执行的报告中有提及，数据源是返回的JSON。更新完成后，将相应的内容，回填最新的任…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+更新迭代：Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks。需求：在最终报告中，增加获取的JSON的获取数据的日期范围。内容在Python执行的报告中有提及，数据源是返回的JSON。更新完成后，将相应的内容，回填最新的任务报告。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_194143.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-194143] 2026-02-19 19:41:43 +0800
+  - summary: 补充：我需要的日期是，Json返回数据里，各数据创建时间的范围，而不是api请求的时间，若有偏差则修正，继续你的任务。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+补充：我需要的日期是，Json返回数据里，各数据创建时间的范围，而不是api请求的时间，若有偏差则修正，继续你的任务。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_195248.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-195248] 2026-02-19 19:52:48 +0800
+  - summary: 卡住了么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+卡住了么？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_200141.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-200141] 2026-02-19 20:01:41 +0800
+  - summary: 执行的时间太久了，换一种方法把。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+执行的时间太久了，换一种方法把。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201005.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-201005] 2026-02-19 20:10:05 +0800
+  - summary: 更新迭代：Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks。需求：在最终报告中，增加每个申请API时参数中开始和结束日期。以及返回的Json数据量。更新完成后，告诉我最后一次Data Flow Structure Ana…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+更新迭代：Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks。需求：在最终报告中，增加每个申请API时参数中开始和结束日期。以及返回的Json数据量。更新完成后，告诉我最后一次Data Flow Structure Analysis结果中，以上数据内容。------------之前的任务耗时太久，终止吧。之前任务若有产生修改则回滚，若有一次性的脚本代码则删除。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201058.md

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+- [P20260219-201058] 2026-02-19 20:10:58 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: 增加 JSON 数…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: 增加 JSON 数据创建时间日期范围到 Data Flow 报告（已废弃）
+- STATUS: abandoned
+- USER QUERIES: 1 ("增加获取的JSON的获取数据的日期范围"), 补充 ("我需要的日期是Json返回数据里各数据创建时间的范围")
+- DETAILS:
+  - 用户最初要求在 dataflow 报告中增加 JSON 数据的日期范围
+  - 已在 `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py` 中添加了 `_extract_date_ranges()` 函数（约 line 57-125），从 json_trees 的时间字段 samples 中提取日期范围
+  - 但尚未在 `generate_report()` 函数中调用该函数（报告头部、总览表、逐表详情均未集成）
+  - `dataflow_analyzer.py` 源文件缺失（仅有 pyc），导致反编译探查耗时过长
+  - 用户因耗时太久明确终止此任务，要求回滚修改
+  - 已删除临时脚本 `scripts/ops/_inspect_analyzer.py`
+  - `gen_dataflow_report.py` 中的 `_extract_date_ranges` 函数和相关 import 仍在文件中（unstaged changes），需要回滚
+- FILEPATHS: `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`
+
+## TASK 2: 新需求 — 增加 API 请求参数日期 + JSON 数据量到报告
+- STATUS: in-progress
+- USER QUERIES: 最后两条 ("增加每个申请API时参数中开始和结束日期。以及返回的Json数据量")
+- DETAILS:
+  - 用户重新定义了需求：不再是从 JSON 数据中提取创建时间范围，而是：
+    1. 每个 API 请求时传入的 date_from / date_to 参数
+    2. 返回的 JSON 数据量（记录数）
+  - 这些信息应该已经在 `collection_manifest.json` 中（`record_count` 字段已有），但 date_from/date_to 参数目前未记录在 manifest 中
+  - `dataflow_analyzer.py` 源文件缺失（仅有 `scripts/ops/__pycache__/dataflow_analyzer.cpython-313.pyc`），需要重建或从 pyc 反编译
+  - 需要先回滚 TASK 1 的修改（`gen_dataflow_report.py` 中的 `_extract_date_ranges` 函数 + `import re as _re_date`）
+  - 更新完成后需要告知用户最后一次分析结果中的相关数据
+- NEXT STEPS:
+  1. 回滚 `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py` 中 TASK 1 的修改（删除 `_extract_date_ranges` 函数和 `import re as _re_date`，约 line 57-125）
+  2. 确认 `collection_manifest.json` 中是否已有 date_from/date_to 信息（当前没有）
+  3. 修改 `dataflow_analyzer` 模块（pyc only，可能需要重建源文件）使其在 manifest 中记录 API 请求的 date_from/date_to 参数
+  4. 修改 `gen_dataflow_report.py` 的 `generate_report()` 函数：在报告头部和总览表中增加 API 请求日期范围和 JSON 数据量
+  5. 更新 hook prompt `.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`
+  6. 运行报告生成脚本验证
+  7. 回填最新报告 `export/dataflow_analysis/dataflow_2026-02-19_190440.md`
+- FILEPATHS:
+  - `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`
+  - `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`
+  - `scripts/ops/__pycache__/dataflow_analyzer.cpython-313.pyc` (源文件缺失)
+  - `.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`
+  - `export/dataflow_analysis/collection_manifest.json`
+  - `export/dataflow_analysis/dataflow_2026-02-19_190440.md`
+
+## KEY ARCHITECTURE CONTEXT
+- 项目是 NeoZQYY Monorepo，台球门店全栈数据平台
+- Data Flow Structure Analysis 由两个脚本组成：`analyze_dataflow.py`（采集）→ `gen_dataflow_report.py`（报告生成）
+- 核心模块 `dataflow_analyzer` 的 .py 源文件缺失，仅有 pyc 缓存
+- 采集数据存放在 `export/dataflow_analysis/` 下，包含 `collection_manifest.json`、`json_trees/`、`field_mappings/`、`db_schemas/`、`bd_descriptions/`
+- `collection_manifest.json` 中每张表有 `record_count`、`json_field_count`、`ods_column_count` 等字段，但无 date_from/date_to
+- `analyze_dataflow.py` 的 CLI 支持 `--date-from` 和 `--date-to` 参数
+- Hook 配置在 `.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`
+- 运行包装脚本：`scripts/ops/_run_dataflow.py`（采集）、`scripts/ops/_run_report.py`（报告）
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 脚本执行规范：优先编写 Python 脚本再执行，避免 PowerShell 复杂逻辑
+- 一次性运维脚本放 `scripts/ops/`
+- 之前任务产生的修改需要回滚，一次性脚本需要删除
+- 用户对耗时过长的操作不耐烦，需要高效执行
+
+Files to read:
+- `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`
+- `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`
+- `.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`
+- `export/dataflow_analysis/collection_manifest.json`
+- `scripts/ops/_run_dataflow.py`
+- `scripts/ops/_run_report.py`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 更新迭代：Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks。需求：在最终报告中，增加每个申请API时参数中开始和结束日期。以及返回的Json数据量。更新完成后，告诉我最后一次Data Flow Structure Analysis结果中，以上数据内容。------------之前的任务耗时太久，终止吧。之前任务若有产生修改则回滚，若有一次性的脚本代码则删除。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 更新迭代：Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks。需求：在最终报告中，增加每个申请API时参数中开始和结束日期。以及返回的Json数据量。更新完成后，告诉我最后一次Data Flow Structure Analysis结果中，以上数据内容。------------之前的任务耗时太久，终止吧。之前任务若有产生修改则回滚，若有一次性的脚本代码则删除。
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. 执行的时间太久了，换一种方法把。
+8. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+9. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+10. 卡住了么？
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+13. 补充：我需要的日期是，Json返回数据里，各数据创建时间的范围，而不是api请求的时间，若有偏差则修正，继续你的任务。
+14. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+15. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+16. 更新迭代：Data Flow Structure Analysis的hooks。需求：在最终报告中，增加获取的JSON的获取数据的日期范围。内容在Python执行的报告中有提及，数据源是返回的JSON。更新完成后，将相应的内容，回填最新的任务报告。
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 10 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201130.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-201130] 2026-02-19 20:11:30 +0800
+  - summary: 对于排查缺失和对不齐的字段，需要你手动确认排查哦~
+  - prompt:
+```text
+对于排查缺失和对不齐的字段，需要你手动确认排查哦~
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201148.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-201148] 2026-02-19 20:11:48 +0800
+  - summary: 对于排查缺失和对不齐的字段，需要你手动确认排查哦~
+  - prompt:
+```text
+对于排查缺失和对不齐的字段，需要你手动确认排查哦~
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201228.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-201228] 2026-02-19 20:12:28 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201314.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-201314] 2026-02-19 20:13:14 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201412.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-201412] 2026-02-19 20:14:12 +0800
+  - summary: 脚本排查出缺失或对不齐的字段，需要你手动调查和推测，最终才能确认哦~严谨一些~
+  - prompt:
+```text
+脚本排查出缺失或对不齐的字段，需要你手动调查和推测，最终才能确认哦~严谨一些~
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201455.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-201455] 2026-02-19 20:14:55 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_201529.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-201529] 2026-02-19 20:15:29 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_202012.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+- [P20260219-202012] 2026-02-19 20:20:12 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- Let me read the curr…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+Let me read the current state of the key files to understand what needs to be done.
+
+<tool_call>
+{"name": "readFile", "arguments": {"path": "scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 140, "explanation": "查看文件开头，确认 TASK 1 需要回滚的 _extract_date_ranges 代码范围"}}
+</tool_call>
+
+<tool_call>
+{"name": "readFile", "arguments": {"path": "scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 80, "explanation": "查看 analyze_dataflow.py 的 CLI 参数定义和 main 函数"}}
+</tool_call>
+
+<tool_call>
+{"name": "readFile", "arguments": {"path": "export/dataflow_analysis/collection_manifest.json", "explanation": "查看当前 manifest 结构"}}
+</tool_call>
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 2 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_202131.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-202131] 2026-02-19 20:21:31 +0800
+  - summary: 更新：.kiro\specs\dataflow-field-completion\tasks.md补充：脚本排查出缺失或对不齐的字段，需要你手动调查和推测，最终才能确认哦~严谨一些~
+  - prompt:
+```text
+更新：.kiro\specs\dataflow-field-completion\tasks.md补充：脚本排查出缺失或对不齐的字段，需要你手动调查和推测，最终才能确认哦~严谨一些~
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_202555.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-202555] 2026-02-19 20:25:55 +0800
+  - summary: 我说的人工，是指你啊。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我说的人工，是指你啊。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_212743.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-212743] 2026-02-19 21:27:43 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_214014.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-214014] 2026-02-19 21:40:14 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_214047.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-214047] 2026-02-19 21:40:47 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_215034.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-215034] 2026-02-19 21:50:34 +0800
+  - summary: docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connect…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_215355.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-215355] 2026-02-19 21:53:55 +0800
+  - summary: 先导出，再决定是否要继续任务
+  - prompt:
+```text
+先导出，再决定是否要继续任务
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_220356.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-220356] 2026-02-19 22:03:56 +0800
+  - summary: 我的本意是：docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md修改：将logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ET…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我的本意是：docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md修改：将logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。-------------结果你将现在的项目也这么做了，这样也不错。那么，继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_220612.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-220612] 2026-02-19 22:06:12 +0800
+  - summary: LLZQ-test数据库，和billiards_dwd 的 schema 这个信息严重过期了，哪里还有这些信息？？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+LLZQ-test数据库，和billiards_dwd 的 schema 这个信息严重过期了，哪里还有这些信息？？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_221202.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-221202] 2026-02-19 22:12:02 +0800
+  - summary: MCP改成以下库：etl_feiqiu：ETL流程，feiqiu连接器的数据库，正式环境库。test_etl_feiqiu：ETL流程，feiqiu连接器的数据库，开发和测试环境库。zqyy_app：小程序用的，正式环境库。test_zqy…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+MCP改成以下库：etl_feiqiu：ETL流程，feiqiu连接器的数据库，正式环境库。test_etl_feiqiu：ETL流程，feiqiu连接器的数据库，开发和测试环境库。zqyy_app：小程序用的，正式环境库。test_zqyy_app：小程序用的，开发和测试环境库。.env 和各类文档都更新。.env 的PG_NAME参数是什么意思？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_221414.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-221414] 2026-02-19 22:14:14 +0800
+  - summary: 那么，test_zqyy_app的PG_DSN用不用加上，毕竟本项目由若干数据库参与。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+那么，test_zqyy_app的PG_DSN用不用加上，毕竟本项目由若干数据库参与。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_221646.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-221646] 2026-02-19 22:16:46 +0800
+  - summary: 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_221755.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-221755] 2026-02-19 22:17:55 +0800
+  - summary: .env更新了参数，各个代码调用是否也改了?
+  - prompt:
+```text
+.env更新了参数，各个代码调用是否也改了?
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_221825.md

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+- [P20260219-221825] 2026-02-19 22:18:25 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Unified E…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Unified Export Directory Structure & .env Configuration
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1 ("docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建...通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。")
+- **DETAILS**:
+  * Created unified `export/` directory structure with three top-level categories: `ETL-Connectors/`, `SYSTEM/`, `BACKEND/`
+  * Migrated old data from `export/ETL/`, `export/dataflow_analysis/`, `export/field_audit/` to new paths and deleted old directories
+  * Updated `.env` (root), `.env.template`, and `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env` with all new path variables
+  * Added `.gitkeep` files to preserve empty directories
+  * New environment variables added: `ETL_REPORT_ROOT`, `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT`, `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT`, `API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT`, `SYSTEM_LOG_ROOT`, `BACKEND_LOG_ROOT`
+  * Existing variables updated to new paths: `EXPORT_ROOT`, `LOG_ROOT`, `FETCH_ROOT`, `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT`
+- **FILEPATHS**: `.env`, `.env.template`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env`
+
+Final directory structure:
+```
+export/
+├── ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/
+│   ├── JSON/          — API 原始 JSON 导出
+│   ├── LOGS/          — ETL 运行日志
+│   └── REPORTS/       — ETL 质检/完整性报告
+├── SYSTEM/
+│   ├── LOGS/          — 系统级运维日志
+│   ├── REPORTS/
+│   │   ├── dataflow_analysis/  — 数据流结构分析报告
+│   │   ├── field_audit/        — 字段排查报告
+│   │   └── full_dataflow_doc/  — 全链路数据流文档
+│   └── CACHE/
+│       └── api_samples/        — API 样本缓存
+└── BACKEND/
+    └── LOGS/          — 后端结构化日志（预留）
+```
+
+## TASK 2: Update LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md & Create EXPORT-PATHS.md
+
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 2 ("继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。")
+- **DETAILS**:
+  * Updated `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`:
+    - Changed "最后更新" date to 2026-02-20
+    - Replaced server directory creation commands (removed standalone `test\logs` and `prod\logs`, added note pointing to EXPORT-PATHS.md)
+    - Added output path env vars to both test and prod `.env` examples
+  * Created `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` with:
+    - Directory overview, env variable mapping table
+    - Detailed per-directory documentation (purpose, env var, config loading chain, code usage, sample output)
+    - Code adaptation status table (✅ for already working, ❌ for needs code changes)
+    - Server environment config examples for dev/test/prod
+- **FILEPATHS**: `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`, `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
+
+## TASK 3: Adapt Code to Read New Export Path Variables
+
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: 3 ("本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？")
+- **DETAILS**:
+  * Agent analyzed which code already works (4 paths) vs needs changes (4 files)
+  * Already working (no code changes needed): `EXPORT_ROOT`, `LOG_ROOT`, `FETCH_ROOT` (via `env_parser.py` → `AppConfig`), `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT` (via `os.environ.get()` in `gen_dataflow_report.py`)
+  * Searched for md docs referencing old paths — only `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md` line 88 has a stale reference (`apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/export/JSON/`). Audit prompt_logs should NOT be modified.
+  * Agent was about to start code changes when context limit hit
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  * Modify 4 code files to read new env variables:
+    1. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py` — `write_report()` function: add `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var as default root instead of hardcoded `Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "reports"`
+    2. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py` — `REPORT_PATH` class attribute: read from `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var or config instead of hardcoded `Path("reports/dwd_quality_report.json")`
+    3. `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` — Lines 27-28: Change `OUT` to read `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT` env var, change `SAMPLE_DIR` to read `API_SAMPLE_CACHE_ROOT` env var
+    4. `scripts/ops/field_audit.py` — Default output path: read `FIELD_AUDIT_ROOT` env var instead of hardcoded path
+  * Update 1 md doc:
+    - `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md` line 88: update stale path reference
+  * After code changes, update `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` adaptation status table (flip ❌ to ✅)
+- **FILEPATHS**:
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`
+  - `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`
+  - `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`
+  - `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md`
+  - `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
+
+- User's original intent was to modify the LAUNCH-CHECKLIST deployment doc (move logs into export/) and create export directory structure for deployment planning. Agent went further and also restructured the actual local project — user said "这样也不错" (that's fine too).
+- All documentation and comments must be in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering rule)
+- Code identifiers stay in English
+- Audit prompt_logs (`docs/audit/prompt_logs/`) are historical records and must NOT be modified
+- Config priority: `defaults.py` < root `.env` < app `.env` < env vars < CLI args
+- ETL path config flows through `env_parser.py` `ENV_MAP` → `AppConfig` `io.*` section
+- System-level scripts read paths directly via `os.environ.get()` or `python-dotenv`
+- This change touches root `.env` files (governance: root-file audit required). User was reminded but hasn't run `/audit` yet.
+
+## KEY CODE ARCHITECTURE
+
+- ETL config chain: `config/defaults.py` (DEFAULTS dict) → `config/env_parser.py` (ENV_MAP + load_env_overrides) → `config/settings.py` (AppConfig.load())
+- `ENV_MAP` maps env var names to dotted config paths, e.g. `"EXPORT_ROOT": ("io.export_root",)`
+- `task_executor.py._attach_run_file_logger()` reads `self.config["io"]["log_root"]`
+- `json_store.py.dump_json()` is the low-level JSON writer; ODS tasks pass paths derived from config
+- `integrity_service.py.write_report()` has `report_path` param but defaults to hardcoded ETL-internal `reports/` dir
+- `gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` has hardcoded `OUT` and `SAMPLE_DIR` at module level (lines 27-28)
+
+## Files to read
+
+- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
+- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`
+- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`
+- `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`
+- `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`
+- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-field-completion/design.md`
+- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/config/env_parser.py`
+- `.env`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 本机（开发机）用修改代码，配合这些路径定义么？需要更新相应的 各级的md文档么？
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+8. 我的本意是：docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md修改：将logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。-------------结果你将现在的项目也这么做了，这样也不错。那么，继续修改部署的文档。然后对现在export路径，各自代码如何配合，落到相应的md文档中。
+9. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (dir:admin-web, dir:backend, root-file). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+10. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md的logs目录，放入export目录下。并在export目录下新建：export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSONexport/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/LOGSexport/SYSTEM/LOGS通过.env文件，配置所有类型，口径的输出文件路径。帮我看下项目，还有什么要输出的内容，分别建立各自的路径。
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 6 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_222415.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-222415] 2026-02-19 22:24:15 +0800
+  - summary: 对了，我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+对了，我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_223032.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-223032] 2026-02-19 22:30:32 +0800
+  - summary: 你哪个步骤卡住了？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+你哪个步骤卡住了？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_223238.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-223238] 2026-02-19 22:32:38 +0800
+  - summary: 卡住了么？
+  - prompt:
+```text
+卡住了么？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_223810.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-223810] 2026-02-19 22:38:10 +0800
+  - summary: 继续，若编辑时间过长，则想办法解决。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续，若编辑时间过长，则想办法解决。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_223822.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-223822] 2026-02-19 22:38:22 +0800
+  - summary: 继续，若编辑时间过长，则想办法解决。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续，若编辑时间过长，则想办法解决。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_224117.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-224117] 2026-02-19 22:41:17 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_224207.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-224207] 2026-02-19 22:42:07 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_224227.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-224227] 2026-02-19 22:42:27 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_225006.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-225006] 2026-02-19 22:50:06 +0800
+  - summary: 默认带上。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+默认带上。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_225332.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-225332] 2026-02-19 22:53:32 +0800
+  - summary: 不是这个逻辑，当申请API时，需要有效的返回内容。所以：默认是今天到10天前，200条记录，若能满，则通过。若不足200条记录，则扩展至今天到30天前，不满足则扩展至今天到60天前，30一增幅，直到90天前。然后，分析字段时，也是遍历，拼一…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+不是这个逻辑，当申请API时，需要有效的返回内容。所以：默认是今天到10天前，200条记录，若能满，则通过。若不足200条记录，则扩展至今天到30天前，不满足则扩展至今天到60天前，30一增幅，直到90天前。然后，分析字段时，也是遍历，拼一个最全的字段结构，现在是这样的么？
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_225356.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-225356] 2026-02-19 22:53:56 +0800
+  - summary: 继续
+  - prompt:
+```text
+继续
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_225536.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-225536] 2026-02-19 22:55:36 +0800
+  - summary: 逐表扩展另外，所有字段用途规则，置信度的揣测需要你人工处理，这部分不要用python代码。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+逐表扩展另外，所有字段用途规则，置信度的揣测需要你人工处理，这部分不要用python代码。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_225915.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-225915] 2026-02-19 22:59:15 +0800
+  - summary: 我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，apps下的代码，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。以上，再检查一遍。另外，不能都使用.env的配置么？现在都是写死的路径…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，apps下的代码，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。以上，再检查一遍。另外，不能都使用.env的配置么？现在都是写死的路径啊，不利于维护。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_230804.md

@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+- [P20260219-230804] 2026-02-19 23:08:04 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: 增加 JSON 数…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: 增加 JSON 数据创建时间日期范围到 Data Flow 报告
+- **STATUS**: abandoned
+- **USER QUERIES**: 原始请求 ("增加获取的JSON的获取数据的日期范围"), 补充 ("我需要的日期是Json返回数据里各数据创建时间的范围")
+- **DETAILS**: 用户因耗时太久明确终止此任务，要求回滚。`gen_dataflow_report.py` 中添加了 `_extract_date_ranges()` 函数和相关代码。回滚已完成——删除了 `_extract_date_ranges`、`_DATE_RE`、`_SENTINEL_YEARS` 及相关 CHANGE 注释。
+- **FILEPATHS**: `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`
+
+## TASK 2: 增加 API 请求参数日期 + JSON 数据量到报告 + 逐表自适应日期扩展 + 删除字段用途推测代码
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: "增加每个申请API时参数中开始和结束日期。以及返回的Json数据量", "默认带上", "不是这个逻辑，当申请API时...默认是今天到10天前...若不足200条记录，则扩展至今天到30天前...", "逐表扩展另外，所有字段用途规则，置信度的揣测需要你人工处理，这部分不要用python代码"
+- **DETAILS**:
+
+### 已完成的修改：
+
+1. **`scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`** — 报告生成器：
+   - 回滚了 TASK 1 遗留代码（`_extract_date_ranges`、`_DATE_RE`、`_SENTINEL_YEARS`、相关注释）✅
+   - 报告头部新增 API 请求日期范围（`date_from ~ date_to`）和 JSON 数据总量 ✅
+   - 删除了 `_FIELD_GUESS_RULES` 列表（约60行正则规则）✅
+   - 删除了 `_guess_field_purpose()` 函数 ✅
+   - 删除了 `import re as _re` ✅
+   - 差异报告5个表格中的"推测用途"+"置信度"两列替换为精简格式（只保留"示例值"、"说明"、"状态"列）✅
+   - 报告生成验证通过（568.5 KB）✅
+   - 导入验证通过 ✅
+
+2. **`scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`** — 采集脚本：
+   - 实现了逐表自适应日期扩展逻辑：10天→30天→60天→90天 ✅
+   - 不满 `target_limit`（默认200）的表会在更宽日期范围重新采集 ✅
+   - 用户指定 `--date-from` 时跳过自适应扩展 ✅
+   - 实际使用的 `date_from`/`date_to` 写入 manifest ✅
+   - CLI help 文本已更新 ✅
+
+3. **`.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`** — Hook 配置：
+   - prompt 更新：说明新增的报告内容（date_from/date_to、JSON 数据总量）✅
+   - 说明采集时可加 `--date-from`/`--date-to` 参数 ✅
+
+4. **`tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py`** — 测试文件：
+   - 删除了 `TestGuessFieldPurpose` 类（8个测试方法）✅
+   - 将 `TestDiffSubTablePurposeColumn` 重命名为 `TestDiffSubTableColumns` ✅
+   - 更新了断言：新表头格式（无推测用途/置信度列）✅
+   - 删除了依赖 `_guess_field_purpose` 的3个测试 ✅
+   - 保留了仍有效的测试（section_numbering、sample_value、bd_desc）✅
+
+### 未完成 / 需要检查的事项：
+
+1. **`analyze_dataflow.py` 路径合规性**：steering 更新了 `export-paths.md`，现在要求通过 `_env_paths.get_output_path("SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT")` 读取路径，禁止硬编码回退。当前 `resolve_output_dir()` 函数仍有硬编码回退 `Path("docs/reports")`，需要改为使用 `_env_paths.get_output_path()`。
+2. **`gen_dataflow_report.py` 路径合规性**：`resolve_data_dir()` 函数仍有硬编码回退 `Path("export/dataflow_analysis")`，help 文本中也有硬编码路径字符串，需要改为使用 `_env_paths.get_output_path()`。
+3. **`dataflow_analyzer.py` 源文件缺失**：只有 `scripts/ops/__pycache__/dataflow_analyzer.cpython-313.pyc`，源文件不存在。这导致：
+   - `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py` 无法运行（`ModuleNotFoundError`）
+   - 这是已有问题，非本次引入
+4. **测试未能运行验证**：由于 `dataflow_analyzer.py` 源文件缺失，所有测试都无法执行。但 `gen_dataflow_report.py` 的导入和报告生成已独立验证通过。
+5. **采集脚本未实际运行验证**：`analyze_dataflow.py` 的逐表自适应扩展逻辑只做了代码修改，未实际运行（需要 API 连接）。
+
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  * 修改 `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` 的 `resolve_output_dir()` 使用 `_env_paths.get_output_path("SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT")`
+  * 修改 `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py` 的 `resolve_data_dir()` 使用 `_env_paths.get_output_path("SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT")`
+  * 更新 help 文本中的硬编码路径引用
+  * 验证报告生成仍然正常工作
+  * 告知用户最后一次分析结果中的相关数据（已部分完成：JSON 数据总量 3395 条，date_from/date_to 未记录因为是旧采集）
+
+- **FILEPATHS**: `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`, `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`, `.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`, `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py`, `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py`, `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/collection_manifest.json`
+
+## KEY ARCHITECTURE CONTEXT
+- 项目是 NeoZQYY Monorepo，台球门店全栈数据平台
+- Data Flow Structure Analysis 由两个脚本组成：`analyze_dataflow.py`（采集）→ `gen_dataflow_report.py`（报告生成）
+- 核心模块 `dataflow_analyzer` 的 `.py` 源文件缺失，仅有 pyc 缓存（`dataflow_analyzer.cpython-313.pyc`）
+- 采集数据存放在 `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/` 下
+- `collection_manifest.json` 中每张表有 `record_count`、`json_field_count`、`ods_column_count` 等字段
+- Hook 配置在 `.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`
+- 运行包装脚本：`scripts/ops/_run_dataflow.py`（采集）、`scripts/ops/_run_report.py`（报告）
+- 路径工具：`scripts/ops/_env_paths.py` 提供 `get_output_path(env_var)` 函数
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
+- 所有说明性文字使用简体中文
+- 脚本执行规范：优先编写 Python 脚本再执行，避免 PowerShell 复杂逻辑
+- 一次性运维脚本放 `scripts/ops/`
+- 之前任务产生的修改需要回滚，一次性脚本需要删除
+- 用户对耗时过长的操作不耐烦，需要高效执行
+- 改动文件如命中高风险路径需审计（本任务涉及的 `scripts/ops/` 不在高风险路径中）
+- 字段用途/置信度的推测不要用 Python 代码自动推测，改为人工处理
+- 输出路径必须通过 `_env_paths.get_output_path()` 读取，禁止硬编码回退路径（steering 最新要求）
+- 逐表自适应日期扩展策略：10天→30天→60天→90天，每轮只对不满 target_limit 的表扩展
+
+## Files to read
+- `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`
+- `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`
+- `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py`
+- `.kiro/hooks/dataflow-analyze.kiro.hook`
+- `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/collection_manifest.json`
+- `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py` (lines 1786-1920 for updated TestDiffSubTableColumns)
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 逐表扩展另外，所有字段用途规则，置信度的揣测需要你人工处理，这部分不要用python代码。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 逐表扩展另外，所有字段用途规则，置信度的揣测需要你人工处理，这部分不要用python代码。
+5. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+8. 不是这个逻辑，当申请API时，需要有效的返回内容。所以：默认是今天到10天前，200条记录，若能满，则通过。若不足200条记录，则扩展至今天到30天前，不满足则扩展至今天到60天前，30一增幅，直到90天前。然后，分析字段时，也是遍历，拼一个最全的字段结构，现在是这样的么？
+9. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+10. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+11. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+12. 默认带上。
+13. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+14. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+15. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 8 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_232322.md

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+- [P20260219-232322] 2026-02-19 23:23:22 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Unified E…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Unified Export Directory Structure & .env Configuration
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1-12 (from previous sessions)
+- **DETAILS**: Created unified `export/` directory structure with three top-level categories: `ETL-Connectors/`, `SYSTEM/`, `BACKEND/`. Updated `.env`, `.env.template`, and `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env` with all path variables.
+- **FILEPATHS**: `.env`, `.env.template`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env`
+
+## TASK 2: Update LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md & Create EXPORT-PATHS.md
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **DETAILS**: Updated deployment docs and created `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` with directory overview, env variable mapping, code adaptation status.
+- **FILEPATHS**: `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`, `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
+
+## TASK 3: Eliminate ALL hardcoded output paths — use .env exclusively
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: User said "不能都使用.env的配置么？现在都是写死的路径啊，不利于维护" and "我希望现在的scripts路径下的脚本，apps下的代码，未来的kiro对话和Spec模式，以及hooks，skills，MCP中，涉及到输出文件的内容，都遵循这个规则。以上，再检查一遍。"
+- **DETAILS**:
+
+### Completed work (across 3 sessions):
+
+**Session 1 — scripts/ops/ and ETL core modules:**
+1. Created `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py` — shared utility with `get_output_path(env_var)` that does `load_dotenv` + read + mkdir + raises `KeyError` if missing
+2. Updated all `scripts/ops/` scripts to use `_env_paths.get_output_path()`:
+   - `analyze_dataflow.py`, `gen_dataflow_report.py`, `gen_dataflow_doc.py`, `gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`, `gen_api_field_mapping.py`, `field_audit.py`, `export_dwd_field_review.py`
+3. Updated ETL core modules to raise `KeyError`/`RuntimeError` when env missing:
+   - `quality/integrity_service.py`, `quality/integrity_checker.py`, `tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`
+4. Updated ETL internal scripts `_build_report_path()` to use `ETL_REPORT_ROOT`:
+   - `scripts/check/check_ods_content_hash.py`, `scripts/repair/repair_ods_content_hash.py`, `scripts/repair/dedupe_ods_snapshots.py`
+5. Updated `REPORT_DIR` in ETL scripts to prefer `ETL_REPORT_ROOT`:
+   - `scripts/run_compare_v3.py`, `scripts/run_compare_v3_fixed.py`, `scripts/full_api_refresh_v2.py`, `scripts/refresh_json_and_audit.py`
+6. Updated `.env.template` — uncommented all SYSTEM/BACKEND path variables
+7. Created steering rule `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md` — forbids hardcoded paths entirely
+8. Updated `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` — removed old fallback path examples
+9. Updated `.kiro/specs/dataflow-structure-audit/requirements.md` and `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/field_audit/field_investigation_report.md` — fixed stale path references
+
+**Session 2 — generate_report.py, test file, EXPORT-PATHS.md:**
+10. Fixed `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/generate_report.py` — `REPORTS_DIR` now reads `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` via `os.environ.get()` + `load_dotenv` + `KeyError` on missing. Updated docstring.
+11. Added `import pytest` to `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py`
+12. Updated `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` — replaced stale descriptions for ETL REPORTS, dataflow_analysis, and field_audit sections to reflect "no fallback, raise on missing" policy
+
+**Session 3 — deep scan and remaining hardcoded paths:**
+13. Removed `or ...docs/reports` fallback from scripts that already had `os.environ.get("ETL_REPORT_ROOT")`:
+    - `scripts/run_compare_v3.py` ✅
+    - `scripts/run_compare_v3_fixed.py` ✅
+    - `scripts/full_api_refresh_v2.py` ✅
+    - `scripts/refresh_json_and_audit.py` ✅
+    - `scripts/debug/analyze_performance.py` ✅
+14. Fixed completely hardcoded `docs/reports` in:
+    - `scripts/debug/debug_blackbox.py` ✅ (also added `import os`)
+    - `scripts/debug/analyze_architecture.py` ✅
+    - `scripts/compare_api_ods_v2.py` ✅ (two locations)
+    - `scripts/compare_api_ods.py` ✅ (two locations)
+    - `scripts/check_json_vs_md.py` ✅
+15. Fixed `api/recording_client.py` — removed `or "export/JSON"` fallback, now raises `RuntimeError` if config empty ✅
+16. Fixed `config/defaults.py` — changed `io.export_root`, `io.log_root`, `io.fetch_root`, `pipeline.fetch_root` from `"export/JSON"`/`"export/LOG"` to `""` (empty string). Changed `ods.json_doc_dir` from `"export/test-json-doc"` to `""` ✅
+17. Fixed `scripts/rebuild/rebuild_db_and_run_ods_to_dwd.py` — `DEFAULT_JSON_DIR` now reads from `ODS_JSON_DOC_DIR` / `INGEST_SOURCE_DIR` env vars. Updated docstring example. ✅
+18. Fixed `scripts/check/check_ods_json_vs_table.py` — `json_dir` now reads from `JSON_DOC_DIR` / `ODS_JSON_DOC_DIR` env vars, raises `KeyError` if missing ✅
+
+### Test results:
+- ETL unit tests: 172 passed, 1 skipped, 1 failed (the failure is `test_cli_args.py::TestBuildCliOverrides::test_data_source_online_sets_run_key` — `AttributeError: 'Namespace' object has no attribute 'force_full'` — **pre-existing bug, NOT caused by our changes**)
+- Property tests (`tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py`): **FAILING with `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'dataflow_analyzer'`** — the test file imports from `dataflow_analyzer` but the actual file is `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`. The module `dataflow_analyzer` does NOT exist. The test's `sys.path.insert` adds `scripts/ops/` to path, but there's no `dataflow_analyzer.py` there.
+
+### Scan results — remaining `"export/"` references in code (all non-output-path, safe to keep):
+- `scripts/server/setup-server-git.py` — git skip-worktree prefix, not output path
+- `tests/unit/test_audit_inventory.py` — test classification constant, not output path
+- `scripts/audit/inventory_analyzer.py` — file classification logic, not output path
+
+### Scan results — `"docs.*reports"` hardcoded output paths: **ZERO remaining** ✅
+
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  1. **CRITICAL: Fix `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py` import issue** — The test imports `from dataflow_analyzer import (...)` but the actual module is `analyze_dataflow.py` in `scripts/ops/`. Either:
+     - Rename `analyze_dataflow.py` → `dataflow_analyzer.py` (risky, may break other references)
+     - OR change the test import to `from analyze_dataflow import (...)` (safer)
+     - Need to check: the test also imports `from analyze_dataflow import build_parser, resolve_output_dir` on line ~530 — so it uses BOTH names. The main symbols (`AnalyzerConfig`, `ColumnInfo`, `FieldInfo`, `TableCollectionResult`, `collect_all_tables`, `dump_collection_results`, `flatten_json_tree`) are imported as `dataflow_analyzer` but `build_parser`, `resolve_output_dir`, `generate_output_filename` are imported as `analyze_dataflow`. Also `parse_table_map`, `parse_fact_mappings`, `build_field_mappings` are imported from `dataflow_analyzer`. So the main data model classes may live in a DIFFERENT file that was deleted/renamed. Need to search for where `AnalyzerConfig`, `FieldInfo`, `flatten_json_tree` etc. are actually defined.
+  2. **Update `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`** to reflect all the new changes from session 3 (defaults.py cleared, recording_client.py fixed, all debug scripts fixed, etc.)
+  3. **Run `/audit`** — this change touches high-risk paths: `api/`, `config/`, `quality/`, `tasks/`, root files
+
+- **FILEPATHS** (all files modified across 3 sessions):
+  - `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py`
+  - `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`, `gen_dataflow_report.py`, `gen_dataflow_doc.py`, `gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`, `gen_api_field_mapping.py`, `field_audit.py`, `export_dwd_field_review.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`, `quality/integrity_checker.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/check/check_ods_content_hash.py`, `check_ods_gaps.py`, `check_ods_json_vs_table.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/repair/repair_ods_content_hash.py`, `dedupe_ods_snapshots.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/run_compare_v3.py`, `run_compare_v3_fixed.py`, `full_api_refresh_v2.py`, `refresh_json_and_audit.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/generate_report.py`, `analyze_performance.py`, `debug_blackbox.py`, `analyze_architecture.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/compare_api_ods.py`, `compare_api_ods_v2.py`, `compare_ods_vs_summary_v2.py`, `check_json_vs_md.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/rebuild/rebuild_db_and_run_ods_to_dwd.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/api/recording_client.py`
+  - `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/config/defaults.py`
+  - `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py`
+  - `.env.template`
+  - `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md`
+  - `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- All output paths MUST be read from `.env` environment variables — no hardcoded fallback paths allowed (not even relative `export/...` paths)
+- When env var is missing, code should raise explicit error (`KeyError`/`RuntimeError`), not silently fall back
+- `scripts/ops/` scripts use shared `_env_paths.get_output_path()` utility
+- ETL internal scripts use `os.environ.get("ETL_REPORT_ROOT")` + explicit error
+- ETL core modules use `env_parser.py` → `AppConfig` `io.*` config chain
+- `.env.template` must have all path variables uncommented (required, not optional)
+- All documentation and comments in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering rule)
+- Code identifiers stay in English
+- Audit prompt_logs (`docs/audit/prompt_logs/`) are historical records and must NOT be modified
+- This change touches high-risk paths — audit required but user hasn't run `/audit` yet
+
+## KEY CODE ARCHITECTURE:
+- ETL config chain: `config/defaults.py` (DEFAULTS dict, now empty strings for paths) → `config/env_parser.py` (ENV_MAP + load_env_overrides) → `config/settings.py` (AppConfig.load())
+- `ENV_MAP` maps env var names to dotted config paths, e.g. `"EXPORT_ROOT": ("io.export_root",)`
+- `defaults.py` io paths are now `""` — if `.env` doesn't set them, downstream code gets empty string and should fail
+
+## Files to read
+- `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py` (CRITICAL — needs import fix, read first ~20 lines and lines ~530 where `from analyze_dataflow import` appears)
+- `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` (check what symbols it actually exports — `build_parser`, `resolve_output_dir`, `generate_output_filename` are there, but `AnalyzerConfig`, `FieldInfo`, `flatten_json_tree` etc. may be missing)
+- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` (needs update to reflect session 3 changes)
+- `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md` (current steering rule)
+- `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py` (shared utility)
+- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/config/defaults.py` (verify the empty string changes)
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 2 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_233627.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-233627] 2026-02-19 23:36:27 +0800
+  - summary: 收尾：遍历所有报告，输出，LOG等相关文件，放到根目录的export相应目录下。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+收尾：遍历所有报告，输出，LOG等相关文件，放到根目录的export相应目录下。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_234104.md

@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+- [P20260219-234104] 2026-02-19 23:41:04 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Unified E…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Unified Export Directory Structure & .env Configuration
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **USER QUERIES**: 1-12 (from previous sessions)
+- **DETAILS**: Created unified `export/` directory structure with three top-level categories: `ETL-Connectors/`, `SYSTEM/`, `BACKEND/`. Updated `.env`, `.env.template`, and `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env` with all path variables.
+- **FILEPATHS**: `.env`, `.env.template`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/.env`
+
+## TASK 2: Update LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md & Create EXPORT-PATHS.md
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **DETAILS**: Updated deployment docs and created `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` with directory overview, env variable mapping, code adaptation status.
+- **FILEPATHS**: `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md`, `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
+
+## TASK 3: Eliminate ALL hardcoded output paths — use .env exclusively
+- **STATUS**: done
+- **DETAILS**: Across 4 sessions, all hardcoded output paths in `scripts/ops/`, ETL core modules, ETL scripts, and `config/defaults.py` were replaced with `.env` reads. Final scan confirms zero remaining `"docs/reports"` or `"export/..."` hardcoded output paths.
+
+### Key changes completed:
+- Created `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py` — shared utility with `get_output_path(env_var)`
+- Updated all `scripts/ops/` scripts to use `_env_paths.get_output_path()`
+- Updated ETL core modules (`quality/integrity_service.py`, `quality/integrity_checker.py`, `tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`) to raise on missing env
+- Updated all ETL internal scripts (`scripts/check/`, `scripts/repair/`, `scripts/debug/`, `scripts/`) to use `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` env var
+- Cleared `config/defaults.py` io paths to `""` (empty string)
+- Fixed `api/recording_client.py` — removed `or "export/JSON"` fallback
+- Created steering rule `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md`
+- Restored `scripts/ops/dataflow_analyzer.py` from git history (was accidentally deleted in commit `4eac07da`), fixed its `output_dir` default from `"docs/reports"` to `""`
+- Fixed `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py` stale comment
+- Updated `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md` — defaults.py descriptions, removed fallback path references in sections 6/7, updated config priority section
+
+### Test results:
+- Property tests (`tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py`): **89 passed** ✓
+- ETL unit tests: **172 passed, 1 skipped, 1 failed** (pre-existing bug in `test_cli_args.py::test_data_source_online_sets_run_key` — `AttributeError: 'Namespace' object has no attribute 'force_full'`)
+
+- **FILEPATHS**: `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py`, `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`, `scripts/ops/dataflow_analyzer.py`, `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`, `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`, `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_doc.py`, `scripts/ops/gen_api_field_mapping.py`, `scripts/ops/gen_full_dataflow_doc.py`, `scripts/ops/field_audit.py`, `scripts/ops/export_dwd_field_review.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_service.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/integrity_checker.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_quality_task.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/config/defaults.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/api/recording_client.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/generate_report.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/analyze_performance.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/debug_blackbox.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/debug/analyze_architecture.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/run_compare_v3.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/run_compare_v3_fixed.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/full_api_refresh_v2.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/refresh_json_and_audit.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/compare_api_ods.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/compare_api_ods_v2.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/check_json_vs_md.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/check/check_ods_content_hash.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/check/check_ods_json_vs_table.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/repair/repair_ods_content_hash.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/repair/dedupe_ods_snapshots.py`, `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/scripts/rebuild/rebuild_db_and_run_ods_to_dwd.py`, `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md`, `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`, `.env.template`, `tests/test_dataflow_analyzer.py`
+
+## TASK 4: Migrate scattered output files to export/ unified directory
+- **STATUS**: in-progress
+- **USER QUERIES**: User said "收尾：遍历所有报告，输出，LOG等相关文件，放到根目录的export相应目录下。"
+- **DETAILS**: Created and ran migration script `scripts/ops/_migrate_scattered_outputs.py`. Successfully migrated:
+  1. `docs/reports/dataflow_api_ods_dwd.md` (600KB) → `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/full_dataflow_doc/`
+  2. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/reports/dwd_quality_report.json` (18KB) → `export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/REPORTS/`
+  3. `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/export/JSON/` (23 old JSON dirs) → `export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/JSON/` (merged with existing newer data, old files skipped where target existed)
+  4. `export/field_audit/dwd_field_review.md` (132KB) → `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/field_audit/` (overwrote smaller 4KB version)
+  
+  Old directories cleaned: `docs/reports/`, `apps/etl/.../reports/`, `apps/etl/.../export/`, `export/field_audit/`
+
+- **NEXT STEPS**:
+  * Run verification script `scripts/ops/_verify_export.py` to confirm final state (was created but not yet executed due to context limit)
+  * Delete the one-time migration scripts (`_migrate_scattered_outputs.py`, `_verify_export.py`) after verification
+  * Run `/audit` — this entire multi-session change touches high-risk paths (`api/`, `config/`, `quality/`, `tasks/`, root files)
+- **FILEPATHS**: `scripts/ops/_migrate_scattered_outputs.py`, `scripts/ops/_verify_export.py`
+
+## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
+- All output paths MUST be read from `.env` environment variables — no hardcoded fallback paths allowed (not even relative `export/...` paths)
+- When env var is missing, code should raise explicit error (`KeyError`/`RuntimeError`), not silently fall back
+- `scripts/ops/` scripts use shared `_env_paths.get_output_path()` utility
+- ETL internal scripts use `os.environ.get("ETL_REPORT_ROOT")` + explicit error
+- ETL core modules use `env_parser.py` → `AppConfig` `io.*` config chain
+- `.env.template` must have all path variables uncommented (required, not optional)
+- All documentation and comments in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering rule)
+- Code identifiers stay in English
+- Audit prompt_logs (`docs/audit/prompt_logs/`) are historical records and must NOT be modified
+- Python scripts for multi-step ops, shell only for simple single commands
+- One-time ops scripts go in `scripts/ops/`, module-specific scripts in module's `scripts/`
+
+## KEY CODE ARCHITECTURE:
+- ETL config chain: `config/defaults.py` (DEFAULTS dict, empty strings for paths) → `config/env_parser.py` (ENV_MAP + load_env_overrides) → `config/settings.py` (AppConfig.load())
+- `ENV_MAP` maps env var names to dotted config paths, e.g. `"EXPORT_ROOT": ("io.export_root",)`
+- `defaults.py` io paths are now `""` — if `.env` doesn't set them, downstream code gets empty string and should fail
+- `dataflow_analyzer.py` is the core collection module (AnalyzerConfig, FieldInfo, ColumnInfo, TableCollectionResult, flatten_json_tree, collect_all_tables, dump_collection_results, ODS_SPECS, etc.)
+- `analyze_dataflow.py` is the CLI entry point that imports from `dataflow_analyzer`
+
+## Files to read
+- `scripts/ops/_verify_export.py`
+- `scripts/ops/_migrate_scattered_outputs.py`
+- `docs/deployment/EXPORT-PATHS.md`
+- `.kiro/steering/export-paths.md`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. 收尾：遍历所有报告，输出，LOG等相关文件，放到根目录的export相应目录下。
+2. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+3. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+4. 收尾：遍历所有报告，输出，LOG等相关文件，放到根目录的export相应目录下。
+5. Output:
+Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
+
+Error output:
+[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
+
+
+
+Exit Code: 1
+6. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+7. Output:
+Command executed successfully with no output.
+
+Exit Code: 0
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 4 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_234418.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-234418] 2026-02-19 23:44:18 +0800
+  - summary: docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md是部署文档。1.1 服务器环境初始化 - Git 排除方案说明（统一 .gitignore + skip-worktree）：这个章节，帮我写一个ps1文件，指定test…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md是部署文档。1.1 服务器环境初始化 - Git 排除方案说明（统一 .gitignore + skip-worktree）：这个章节，帮我写一个ps1文件，指定test prod 目录，将排除的直接删除。并创建各类 export 目录，遵循export目录的清晰。此外，LOG Json等输出内容的落盘，在3个环境中，都有。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_234434.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-234434] 2026-02-19 23:44:34 +0800
+  - summary: docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md是部署文档。1.1 服务器环境初始化 - Git 排除方案说明（统一 .gitignore + skip-worktree）：这个章节，帮我写一个ps1文件，指定test…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+docs\deployment\LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md是部署文档。1.1 服务器环境初始化 - Git 排除方案说明（统一 .gitignore + skip-worktree）：这个章节，帮我写一个ps1文件，指定test prod 目录，将排除的直接删除。并创建各类 export 目录，遵循export目录的清晰。此外，LOG Json等输出内容的落盘，在3个环境中，都有。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_234632.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-234632] 2026-02-19 23:46:32 +0800
+  - summary: 回到我们.kiro\specs\dataflow-field-completion的SPEC任务，第1.3：排查结果汇总：24 个字段需新增 DWD 列 + FACT_MAPPINGS（A 类表 22 个 + store_goods_mas…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+回到我们.kiro\specs\dataflow-field-completion的SPEC任务，第1.3：排查结果汇总：24 个字段需新增 DWD 列 + FACT_MAPPINGS（A 类表 22 个 + store_goods_master 1 个 + assistanton 1 个）5 个字段仅补 FACT_MAPPINGS（recharge_settlements 电费/券字段，DWD 列已存在）3 个字段跳过：discount_price（列名已被占用）、commoditycode（冗余）、provisional_total_cost（列名已被占用）1 个字段待确认 API：time_slot_sale（ODS 列不存在）3 张 C 类表需新建 DWD 表：goods_stock_summary（14 列）、goods_stock_movements（19 列）、settlement_ticket_details（~38 列）修正了脚本的 5 处不准确结论：site_assistant_id 实际通过 FACT_MAPPINGS 映射自 order_assistant_id（非自动映射）discount_price 实际映射自 discount_money（非自动映射）provisional_total_cost 实际映射自 total_purchase_cost（非自动映射）recharge 的 10 个字段实际是同一组 5 个映射缺失settlement_ticket_details 实际有 193 行数据发现潜在映射错误： dwd_assistant_trash_event 中 assistant_no 映射自 assistantname（助教昵称），而 assistanton 才是真正的助教编号。详细报告在 field_investigation_report.md。我还是希望：对于各表（main + ex）现有字段 字段名 说明 还有要新增的字段名和说明，为我导出文档，我要检查下。
+```

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260219_235134.md

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+- [P20260219-235134] 2026-02-19 23:51:34 +0800
+  - summary: 呃...不是的，.kiro\specs\dataflow-field-completion的SPEC已经执行了一半，你手动完成了 ODS DWD层我列出各个表的缺失字段分析。我只是让你给我这个结果，我要对着缺失字段和现有字段复核结果。
+  - prompt:
+```text
+呃...不是的，.kiro\specs\dataflow-field-completion的SPEC已经执行了一半，你手动完成了 ODS DWD层我列出各个表的缺失字段分析。我只是让你给我这个结果，我要对着缺失字段和现有字段复核结果。
+```