在前后端开发联调前 的提交20260223
This commit is contained in:
134
docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260220_002416.md
Normal file
134
docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260220_002416.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
|
||||
- [P20260220-002416] 2026-02-20 00:24:16 +0800
|
||||
- summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Execute D…
|
||||
- prompt:
|
||||
```text
|
||||
CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
## TASK 1: Execute Dataflow Structure Analysis (Two-Phase Pipeline)
|
||||
|
||||
**STATUS**: done
|
||||
|
||||
**USER QUERIES**: User query 1 ("执行数据流结构分析,按以下步骤完成")
|
||||
|
||||
**DETAILS**:
|
||||
The user requested running the full dataflow structure analysis pipeline for the feiqiu (飞球) connector. This involved two existing scripts that were already fully implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 1 — Data Collection** (`analyze_dataflow.py`):
|
||||
- Successfully ran `C:\ProgramData\miniconda3\python.exe C:\NeoZQYY\scripts\ops\analyze_dataflow.py`
|
||||
- Had shell working directory issues (kept defaulting to `C:\NeoZQYY\apps\etl\connectors\feiqiu`), resolved by using absolute paths for both Python and script
|
||||
- Script performed 3 rounds of adaptive date expansion (30→60→90 days) for 11 tables with insufficient records
|
||||
- Final date range: 2025-11-22 ~ 2026-02-20
|
||||
- Results: 23 tables, all successful, 3395 total records
|
||||
- All collection artifacts confirmed on disk:
|
||||
- `json_trees/` — 23 JSON structure trees (with multi-sample values)
|
||||
- `db_schemas/` — 85 ODS/DWD table structure JSONs (23 ODS + 62 DWD)
|
||||
- `field_mappings/` — 23 three-layer mapping files
|
||||
- `bd_descriptions/` — 23 business description files
|
||||
- `collection_manifest.json` — with json_field_count, date_from, date_to
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 2 — Report Generation** (`gen_dataflow_report.py`):
|
||||
- Successfully ran `C:\ProgramData\miniconda3\python.exe C:\NeoZQYY\scripts\ops\gen_dataflow_report.py`
|
||||
- Output: `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/dataflow_2026-02-20_002258.md` (568.6 KB)
|
||||
- Report confirmed to contain all required enhanced content:
|
||||
- Report header with API date range and JSON data volume
|
||||
- Overview table with API JSON field count column (totals: 1067 JSON fields, 980 ODS columns, 892 DWD columns)
|
||||
- Section 1.1: API↔ODS↔DWD field comparison diff report with per-table detail and anchor links
|
||||
- Coverage tables with business description column
|
||||
- API source field tables with business descriptions + multi-sample values
|
||||
- ODS/DWD table structures with bidirectional mapping anchor links
|
||||
|
||||
**Notable findings from the report**:
|
||||
- `settlement_ticket_details` has 0 sample records (fetched per-orderSettleId, not via standard pagination)
|
||||
- `goods_stock_summary` and `goods_stock_movements` have no DWD target tables (C-class, pending creation)
|
||||
- No code changes were made — this was purely a script execution task
|
||||
|
||||
**FILEPATHS**:
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` — Phase 1 CLI entry
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py` — Phase 2 report generator
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/dataflow_analyzer.py` — Core collection module
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/_env_paths.py` — Shared path utility
|
||||
- `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/collection_manifest.json` — Collection manifest
|
||||
- `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/dataflow_2026-02-20_002258.md` — Generated report
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## PROJECT CONTEXT (for new agent orientation)
|
||||
|
||||
**What this project is**: NeoZQYY Monorepo — a full-stack data platform for billiard hall operations. ETL Connector extracts from upstream SaaS API through ODS → DWD → DWS layers. Includes FastAPI backend, WeChat mini-program, admin web console.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key infrastructure**:
|
||||
- Python 3.10+, uv workspace, PostgreSQL (4 databases: etl_feiqiu, test_etl_feiqiu, zqyy_app, test_zqyy_app)
|
||||
- All output paths via `.env` environment variables → `export/` directory tree
|
||||
- Scripts in `scripts/ops/` use `_env_paths.get_output_path()` for path resolution
|
||||
- Shell quirk: PowerShell working directory often stuck at `C:\NeoZQYY\apps\etl\connectors\feiqiu`; use absolute paths for Python executable and script paths
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing specs**: `.kiro/specs/dataflow-structure-audit/` has completed requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md (all tasks marked done)
|
||||
|
||||
**Related reports in workspace**:
|
||||
- `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/field_audit/field_investigation_report.md` — Deep field investigation (identifies 31 fields needing DWD additions)
|
||||
- `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/field_audit/field_review_for_user.md` — User review document for field completion
|
||||
- `docs/deployment/LAUNCH-CHECKLIST.md` — WeChat mini-program launch checklist
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
|
||||
- All responses must be in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering)
|
||||
- All file output must go through `export/` directory via `.env` variables (export-paths.md steering)
|
||||
- Use Python scripts for complex operations, not PowerShell (tech.md steering)
|
||||
- High-risk path changes require audit (governance.md steering)
|
||||
- Currently only analyzing feiqiu connector; future connectors should be auto-discovered
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Files to read
|
||||
- `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/collection_manifest.json`
|
||||
- `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/dataflow_analysis/dataflow_2026-02-20_002258.md`
|
||||
- `.kiro/specs/dataflow-structure-audit/requirements.md`
|
||||
- `.env`
|
||||
|
||||
USER QUERIES(most recent first):
|
||||
1. <source-event>
|
||||
The user manually invoked this action
|
||||
The user is focued on the following file: export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/field_audit/field_review_for_user.md
|
||||
The user has the following paths open: export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/field_audit/field_review_for_user.md
|
||||
</source-event>
|
||||
|
||||
执行数据流结构分析,按以下步骤完成:
|
||||
|
||||
第一阶段:数据采集
|
||||
1. 运行 `python scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` 完成数据采集(如需指定日期范围,加 --date-from / --date-to 参数)
|
||||
2. 确认采集结果已落盘,包括:
|
||||
- json_trees/(含 samples 多示例值)
|
||||
- db_schemas/
|
||||
- field_mappings/(三层映射 + 锚点)
|
||||
- bd_descriptions/(BD_manual 业务描述)
|
||||
- collection_manifest.json(含 json_field_count、date_from、date_to)
|
||||
|
||||
第二阶段:报告生成
|
||||
3. 运行 `python scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py` 生成 Markdown 报告
|
||||
4. 报告包含以下增强内容:
|
||||
- 报告头含 API 请求日期范围(date_from ~ date_to)和 JSON 数据总量
|
||||
- 总览表含 API JSON 字段数列
|
||||
- 1.1 API↔ODS↔DWD 字段对比差异报告
|
||||
- 2.3 覆盖率表含业务描述列
|
||||
- API 源字段表含业务描述列 + 多示例值(枚举值解释)
|
||||
- ODS 表结构含业务描述列 + 上下游双向映射锚点链接
|
||||
- DWD 表结构含业务描述列 + ODS 来源锚点链接
|
||||
5. 输出文件路径和关键统计摘要
|
||||
|
||||
注意:当前仅分析飞球(feiqiu)连接器。未来新增连接器时,应自动发现并纳入分析范围。
|
||||
2. <implicit-rules>## Implicit Rules
|
||||
Focus on creating a new spec file or identifying an existing spec to update.
|
||||
If starting a new spec, create a requirements.md file in the .kiro/specs directory with clear user stories and acceptance criteria.
|
||||
If working with an existing spec, review the current requirements and suggest improvements if needed.
|
||||
Do not make direct code changes yet. First establish or review the spec file that will guide our implementation.</implicit-rules>
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
METADATA:
|
||||
The previous conversation had 2 messages.
|
||||
|
||||
INSTRUCTIONS:
|
||||
Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
|
||||
IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user