在前后端开发联调前 的提交20260223
This commit is contained in:
190
docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260220_103424.md
Normal file
190
docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260220_103424.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
|
||||
- [P20260220-103424] 2026-02-20 10:34:24 +0800
|
||||
- summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Full Prod…
|
||||
- prompt:
|
||||
```text
|
||||
CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
## TASK 1: Full Production Integration Test (api_full, verify_only, custom window)
|
||||
|
||||
**STATUS**: done
|
||||
|
||||
**USER QUERIES**: Initial context transfer, "继续监测 并debug", "定期检查并DEBUG"
|
||||
|
||||
**DETAILS**:
|
||||
- ETL run `896b9647-4e3a-4e10-ac23-e6f59ee9c114` completed successfully
|
||||
- `exit_code=0`, total duration 5,135 seconds (~85 minutes)
|
||||
- 22 ODS tasks executed: 21 SUCC, 1 FAIL (`ODS_ASSISTANT_LEDGER` — expected JSONB bug, fix already in code)
|
||||
- Top data volumes: `ODS_PLATFORM_COUPON` (219,732 records, 27min), `ODS_PAYMENT` (130,560, 13min), `ODS_TABLE_USE` (110,598, 16min)
|
||||
- `verify_only` mode only executes ODS fetch + verification, does NOT run DWD/DWS tasks (by design)
|
||||
- DWS/INDEX layers explicitly skipped in `_run_verification()` with `"lightweight_dws_index"` reason
|
||||
- Reports generated: `etl_timing_20260220_091414.md` and `consistency_report_20260220_091414.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**FILEPATHS**:
|
||||
- `export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/REPORTS/etl_timing_20260220_091414.md`
|
||||
- `export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/REPORTS/consistency_report_20260220_091414.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## TASK 2: Fix consistency report issues (missing DWD fields + whitelist)
|
||||
|
||||
**STATUS**: in-progress
|
||||
|
||||
**USER QUERIES**: "2张dwd表省略 缺少的字段补齐", "fetched_at作为update_time这合理么？", "increment_only 和 increment_verify 模式怎么运作的？"
|
||||
|
||||
**DETAILS**:
|
||||
- Consistency report showed 4 issues:
|
||||
1. `dwd.dim_member.update_time` — missing ODS mapping
|
||||
2. `dwd.dwd_member_balance_change.principal_change_amount` — missing ODS mapping
|
||||
3. `dwd.dwd_goods_stock_movement` — DWD table doesn't exist (user said skip)
|
||||
4. `dwd.dwd_goods_stock_summary` — DWD table doesn't exist (user said skip)
|
||||
|
||||
- **`principal_change_amount` fix (DONE)**: Added mapping `COALESCE(CAST(principal_after AS numeric),0) - COALESCE(CAST(principal_before AS numeric),0)` in `FACT_MAPPINGS`
|
||||
|
||||
- **`update_time` fix (REVISED)**:
|
||||
- Initially mapped to `fetched_at`, but user correctly pointed out `fetched_at` is ETL ingestion time, not business update time
|
||||
- Confirmed via DB query: upstream API payload has NO `update_time`/`modify_time` field — only `create_time`
|
||||
- Reverted the `fetched_at` mapping, now keeping it as NULL with a comment explaining why
|
||||
- Started adding a `KNOWN_NO_SOURCE` whitelist dict in `check_ods_vs_dwd_mappings()` in `consistency_checker.py`
|
||||
|
||||
- **Whitelist implementation (PARTIALLY DONE — CUT OFF)**:
|
||||
- Added `KNOWN_NO_SOURCE` dict at top of `check_ods_vs_dwd_mappings()` with `{"dwd.dim_member": {"update_time"}}`
|
||||
- BUT: the actual logic to USE this whitelist (checking `col_lower in KNOWN_NO_SOURCE.get(dwd_table, set())` in the `else` branch that currently marks fields as "missing") was NOT yet added before context was cut off
|
||||
- Need to also add `"dwd.dwd_member_balance_change": {"principal_change_amount"}` — wait, this one WAS mapped via FACT_MAPPINGS expression, so it should pass now. Only `dim_member.update_time` needs the whitelist.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Other fixes done in this session**:
|
||||
- `test_cli_args.py`: Added `force_full=False` to `_make_args` defaults (was causing test failure)
|
||||
- `README.md`: Added `--force-full` parameter documentation to CLI parameter table
|
||||
- All 738 unit tests passing
|
||||
|
||||
- **User's unanswered question**: "increment_only 和 increment_verify 模式怎么运作的？" — needs explanation based on `flow_runner.py` code
|
||||
|
||||
**NEXT STEPS**:
|
||||
1. Complete the whitelist logic in `consistency_checker.py` — add the branch in the `else` clause (around line 250) that checks `KNOWN_NO_SOURCE` before marking as "missing":
|
||||
```python
|
||||
no_source = KNOWN_NO_SOURCE.get(dwd_table, set())
|
||||
if col_lower in no_source:
|
||||
result.field_results.append(FieldCheckResult(col, "pass", "已知无源字段（上游 API 不提供）"))
|
||||
result.passed_fields += 1
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# existing missing logic
|
||||
```
|
||||
2. Answer user's question about `increment_only` vs `increment_verify` modes (trace `flow_runner.py` code):
|
||||
- `increment_only`: runs `task_executor.run_tasks()` for all resolved layers (ODS→DWD→DWS→INDEX), no verification
|
||||
- `increment_verify`: same as above, then additionally runs `_run_verification()` after
|
||||
3. Run unit tests again to confirm whitelist change doesn't break anything
|
||||
|
||||
**FILEPATHS**:
|
||||
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_load_task.py` (MODIFIED — principal_change_amount mapping added, update_time reverted to NULL)
|
||||
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/consistency_checker.py` (PARTIALLY MODIFIED — KNOWN_NO_SOURCE dict added but logic to use it NOT yet implemented)
|
||||
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_cli_args.py` (MODIFIED — force_full default)
|
||||
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/docs/etl_tasks/README.md` (MODIFIED — --force-full docs)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## TASK 3: ODS_ASSISTANT_LEDGER JSONB fix (from prior session)
|
||||
|
||||
**STATUS**: done (code fix applied, awaiting next ETL run to verify)
|
||||
|
||||
**DETAILS**:
|
||||
- `_mark_missing_as_deleted` in `ods_tasks.py` now detects ALL JSONB columns via `cols_info` udt_name and wraps dict/list values with `Json()`
|
||||
- Fix at line ~654 with CHANGE comment dated 2026-02-20
|
||||
- This run used old code (started before fix), so `ODS_ASSISTANT_LEDGER` still failed as expected
|
||||
|
||||
**FILEPATHS**: `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/ods/ods_tasks.py`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## KEY ARCHITECTURE (for new agent reference):
|
||||
- Frontend: React + Vite + Ant Design at `apps/admin-web/` (localhost:5173)
|
||||
- Backend: FastAPI at `apps/backend/` (localhost:8000)
|
||||
- ETL subprocess launched by backend `task_executor.py`
|
||||
- Auth: JWT tokens in localStorage
|
||||
- ETL data goes to `test_etl_feiqiu` database, execution logs to `test_zqyy_app.public.task_execution_log`
|
||||
- Four DB connections available: `mcp_pg_etl` (etl_feiqiu), `mcp_pg_etl_test` (test_etl_feiqiu), `mcp_pg_app` (zqyy_app), `mcp_pg_app_test` (test_zqyy_app)
|
||||
|
||||
## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
|
||||
- All output text must be in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering)
|
||||
- All file outputs must go through `export/` directory structure via `.env` environment variables
|
||||
- Changes to high-risk paths require `/audit` trigger
|
||||
- Python scripts preferred over PowerShell for complex operations
|
||||
- Audit reminder is pending for: root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:db, db-schema-change, dir:tasks
|
||||
- User explicitly asked to verify code claims — don't speculate about behavior, trace the actual code path
|
||||
- `fetched_at` is ETL ingestion timestamp, NOT business update time — don't confuse them
|
||||
- User said to skip the 2 missing DWD tables (`dwd_goods_stock_movement`, `dwd_goods_stock_summary`)
|
||||
|
||||
## Files to read
|
||||
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/consistency_checker.py` (IN PROGRESS — need to complete KNOWN_NO_SOURCE whitelist logic)
|
||||
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_load_task.py` (verify current state of FACT_MAPPINGS for dim_member and dwd_member_balance_change)
|
||||
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/orchestration/flow_runner.py` (to answer user's question about increment_only vs increment_verify modes)
|
||||
|
||||
USER QUERIES(most recent first):
|
||||
1. verify_only 模式下，代码只执行 ODS 抓取 + 校验，DWD（DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS）和 DWS 聚合任务不会被 run_tasks() 调用。这是设计行为。要跑 DWD+DWS，需要用 increment_only 或 increment_verify 模式。最合理的映射是用 fetched_at 作为 update_time这合理么？我记得 fetched_at 是入库时间吧？难道我记错了？increment_only 和 increment_verify 模式怎么运作的？
|
||||
2. Output:
|
||||
Command executed successfully with no output.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 0
|
||||
3. Output:
|
||||
Command executed successfully with no output.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 0
|
||||
4. verify_only 模式下，代码只执行 ODS 抓取 + 校验，DWD（DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS）和 DWS 聚合任务不会被 run_tasks() 调用。这是设计行为。要跑 DWD+DWS，需要用 increment_only 或 increment_verify 模式。最合理的映射是用 fetched_at 作为 update_time这合理么？我记得 fetched_at 是入库时间吧？难道我记错了？increment_only 和 increment_verify 模式怎么运作的？
|
||||
5. Output:
|
||||
Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
|
||||
|
||||
Error output:
|
||||
[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 1
|
||||
6. Output:
|
||||
Command executed successfully with no output.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 0
|
||||
7. Output:
|
||||
Command executed successfully with no output.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 0
|
||||
8. 2张dwd表省略 缺少的字段补齐 dwd和 DWS没有执行么？
|
||||
9. Output:
|
||||
Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
|
||||
|
||||
Error output:
|
||||
[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 1
|
||||
10. Output:
|
||||
Command executed successfully with no output.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 0
|
||||
11. Output:
|
||||
Command executed successfully with no output.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 0
|
||||
12. 继续监测 并debug
|
||||
13. Output:
|
||||
Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
|
||||
|
||||
Error output:
|
||||
[AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 1
|
||||
14. Output:
|
||||
Command executed successfully with no output.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 0
|
||||
15. Output:
|
||||
Command executed successfully with no output.
|
||||
|
||||
Exit Code: 0
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
METADATA:
|
||||
The previous conversation had 8 messages.
|
||||
|
||||
INSTRUCTIONS:
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user