在前后端开发联调前 的提交20260223

docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260221_122109.md

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+- [P20260221-122109] 2026-02-21 12:21:09 +0800
+  - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Execute E…
+  - prompt:
+```text
+CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
+
+---
+## TASK 1: Execute ETL Full-Chain Data Consistency Black-Box Check
+
+**STATUS**: in-progress
+
+**USER QUERIES**: User's single request - Run `python scripts/ops/etl_consistency_check.py` and summarize findings
+
+**DETAILS**:
+- User requested execution of the ETL consistency check script which performs:
+  - API JSON vs ODS field completeness and value sampling
+  - ODS vs DWD mapping correctness and value transformation verification
+  - DWD vs DWS/INDEX aggregation logic verification
+- The script at `scripts/ops/etl_consistency_check.py` has been fully read and verified complete (1011 lines)
+- The script connects to the database via `PG_DSN` in read-only mode
+- Output goes to `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` (from `.env`)
+- No code changes needed - this is a pure execution task
+- The script was NOT yet executed - context limit was hit before running it
+
+**NEXT STEPS**:
+1. Run the script: `uv run python scripts/ops/etl_consistency_check.py` from the workspace root directory
+2. Check the output report in `ETL_REPORT_ROOT` (path from `.env`)
+3. Read the generated report and summarize key findings to the user
+4. Report structure expected: ETL execution overview, API↔ODS consistency, ODS↔DWD consistency, DWD↔DWS consistency, anomaly summary
+
+**FILEPATHS**:
+- `scripts/ops/etl_consistency_check.py` - the main script to execute
+- `.env` - contains PG_DSN, ETL_REPORT_ROOT, FETCH_ROOT, LOG_ROOT
+
+**KEY CONTEXT FROM PREVIOUS REPORTS** (for interpreting results):
+- Known bug: `DWS_RELATION_INDEX` fails due to `d.is_delete` should be `s.is_delete` in `relation_index_task.py` line 226
+- 14 DWS tasks are registered but not yet run (will show as SKIP)
+- ODS layer: 22/22 tasks typically succeed
+- DWD layer: 20/20 tables have data
+- DWS layer: only 9/32 tables have data
+- Known mapping issues: `dwd.dim_member.update_time` missing ODS source, `dwd.dwd_member_balance_change.principal_change_amount` missing ODS source
+- 2 DWD tables don't exist yet: `dwd.dwd_goods_stock_movement`, `dwd.dwd_goods_stock_summary`
+
+**USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS**:
+- All responses must be in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering)
+- Use `PG_DSN` (production database) in read-only mode, do NOT modify any data
+- Testing environment rules apply: must load `.env` properly, never skip config
+- Output paths must come from `.env` environment variables (export-paths.md steering)
+- Script execution convention: run Python scripts via `uv run python` or `python`
+- The workspace root is `C:\NeoZQYY` on Windows with cmd shell
+- Four database connections available via MCP: `mcp_pg_etl` (production), `mcp_pg_etl_test` (test), `mcp_pg_app`, `mcp_pg_app_test`
+- store_id: `2790685415443269`
+
+**Files to read**:
+- `scripts/ops/etl_consistency_check.py`
+- `.env`
+
+USER QUERIES(most recent first):
+1. <source-event>
+    The user manually invoked this action
+    The user is focued on the following file: No file focused
+    The user has the following paths open: 
+</source-event>
+
+执行 ETL 全链路数据一致性黑盒检查，按以下步骤完成：
+
+1. 运行 `python scripts/ops/etl_consistency_check.py`
+2. 脚本会自动：
+   a. 从 LOG_ROOT 找到最近一次成功的 ETL 日志，解析本次执行的任务列表
+   b. 从 FETCH_ROOT 读取本次 ETL 落盘的 API JSON 文件
+   c. 连接数据库（PG_DSN），对本次任务涉及的每张表逐字段比对：
+      - API JSON vs ODS：字段完整性、值采样比对（随机 5 条记录的关键字段）
+      - ODS vs DWD：字段映射正确性、值转换验证（采样比对）
+      - DWD vs DWS/INDEX：聚合逻辑验证（行数、关键指标抽查）
+   d. 输出 Markdown 报告到 ETL_REPORT_ROOT
+3. 检查报告输出，汇总关键发现
+
+报告结构：
+- 1. ETL 执行概览（任务列表、成功/失败/跳过统计）
+- 2. API↔ODS 数据一致性（逐表逐字段值比对）
+- 3. ODS↔DWD 数据一致性（映射验证 + 值采样）
+- 4. DWD↔DWS 数据一致性（聚合逻辑验证）
+- 5. 异常汇总与建议
+
+注意：使用正式库 PG_DSN 连接（只读模式），不修改任何数据。
+2. <implicit-rules>## Implicit Rules
+Focus on creating a new spec file or identifying an existing spec to update. 
+If starting a new spec, create a requirements.md file in the .kiro/specs directory with clear user stories and acceptance criteria. 
+If working with an existing spec, review the current requirements and suggest improvements if needed. 
+Do not make direct code changes yet. First establish or review the spec file that will guide our implementation.</implicit-rules>
+---
+
+METADATA:
+The previous conversation had 2 messages.
+
+INSTRUCTIONS:
+Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
+IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
+```