在前后端开发联调前 的提交20260223
This commit is contained in:
114
docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260221_123335.md
Normal file
114
docs/audit/prompt_logs/prompt_log_20260221_123335.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
|
||||
- [P20260221-123335] 2026-02-21 12:33:35 +0800
|
||||
- summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Execute D…
|
||||
- prompt:
|
||||
```text
|
||||
CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
## TASK 1: Execute Data Flow Structure Analysis (数据流结构分析)
|
||||
|
||||
**STATUS**: in-progress
|
||||
|
||||
**USER QUERIES**: User's single request - Execute dataflow structure analysis in two phases: (1) data collection via `analyze_dataflow.py`, (2) report generation via `gen_dataflow_report.py`
|
||||
|
||||
**DETAILS**:
|
||||
- User requested a full dataflow structure analysis for the feiqiu (飞球) connector
|
||||
- Two-phase process: Phase 1 = data collection, Phase 2 = report generation
|
||||
- The agent confirmed `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` exists but was cut off before executing anything
|
||||
- No commands have been run yet - the task is at the very beginning
|
||||
- The user specified that if historical task artifacts exist, they should be cleared and re-executed
|
||||
|
||||
**NEXT STEPS**:
|
||||
1. Check the output directory status (likely `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT` from `.env`) for any existing artifacts
|
||||
2. Run `python scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` from the project root to collect data
|
||||
3. Verify collection results are on disk: `json_trees/`, `db_schemas/`, `field_mappings/`, `bd_descriptions/`, `collection_manifest.json`
|
||||
4. Run `python scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py` to generate the Markdown report
|
||||
5. Verify report contains all required enhanced content (API date range, JSON field counts, field diff report with whitelist folding, business descriptions, anchor links, etc.)
|
||||
6. Output the file path and key statistics summary
|
||||
|
||||
**KEY CONTEXT**:
|
||||
- Project is a billiard hall (台球门店) data platform monorepo called NeoZQYY
|
||||
- ETL pipeline: API → ODS → DWD → DWS with PostgreSQL
|
||||
- Four DB instances: `etl_feiqiu`, `test_etl_feiqiu`, `zqyy_app`, `test_zqyy_app`
|
||||
- Environment variables control all output paths (see `export-paths.md` steering)
|
||||
- Output paths come from `.env` - key vars: `SYSTEM_ANALYZE_ROOT`, `FULL_DATAFLOW_DOC_ROOT`
|
||||
- Scripts must be run with `uv run python` or `python` from project root `C:\NeoZQYY`
|
||||
- OS is Windows with cmd shell
|
||||
- Whitelist rules (v4): ETL meta cols, SCD2 cols, siteProfile nested fields - still checked but folded in report
|
||||
- Only analyzing feiqiu connector currently
|
||||
|
||||
**FILEPATHS**:
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` - Phase 1: data collection script
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py` - Phase 2: report generation script (partially loaded, truncated at ~806/889 lines)
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/field_level_report.py` - Related field-level analysis script
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/etl_consistency_check.py` - Related consistency check script (partially loaded, truncated at ~811/1011 lines)
|
||||
- `.env` - Environment variables (not read yet, needed for paths)
|
||||
- `.env.template` - Template for env vars
|
||||
- `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/docs/architecture/data_flow.md` - Architecture documentation
|
||||
- `export/SYSTEM/REPORTS/full_dataflow_doc/dataflow_api_ods_dwd.md` - Previous report output (4838 lines, only 408 loaded)
|
||||
|
||||
**USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS**:
|
||||
- All responses must be in simplified Chinese (简体中文) per `language-zh.md` steering
|
||||
- Must use `.env` for all output paths - never hardcode (per `export-paths.md`)
|
||||
- Testing/scripts must load `.env` properly (per `testing-env.md`)
|
||||
- Prefer Python scripts over PowerShell for complex operations (per `tech.md`)
|
||||
- `cwd` for ETL scripts should be `apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/` but these ops scripts run from project root
|
||||
- DB connections use `PG_DSN` from `.env`
|
||||
- This is NOT a spec creation task - it's a direct execution task despite the system prompt mentioning spec workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Files to read**:
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py`
|
||||
- `scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py`
|
||||
- `.env.template`
|
||||
|
||||
USER QUERIES(most recent first):
|
||||
1. <source-event>
|
||||
The user manually invoked this action
|
||||
The user is focued on the following file: No file focused
|
||||
The user has the following paths open:
|
||||
</source-event>
|
||||
|
||||
执行数据流结构分析,按以下步骤完成。若发现已完成或有历史任务痕迹则清空,重新执行:
|
||||
|
||||
第一阶段:数据采集
|
||||
1. 运行 `python scripts/ops/analyze_dataflow.py` 完成数据采集(如需指定日期范围,加 --date-from / --date-to 参数)
|
||||
2. 确认采集结果已落盘,包括:
|
||||
- json_trees/(含 samples 多示例值)
|
||||
- db_schemas/
|
||||
- field_mappings/(三层映射 + 锚点)
|
||||
- bd_descriptions/(BD_manual 业务描述)
|
||||
- collection_manifest.json(含 json_field_count、date_from、date_to)
|
||||
|
||||
第二阶段:报告生成
|
||||
3. 运行 `python scripts/ops/gen_dataflow_report.py` 生成 Markdown 报告
|
||||
4. 报告包含以下增强内容:
|
||||
- 报告头含 API 请求日期范围(date_from ~ date_to)和 JSON 数据总量
|
||||
- 总览表含 API JSON 字段数列
|
||||
- 1.1 API↔ODS↔DWD 字段对比差异报告(白名单字段折叠汇总,不展开详细表格行)
|
||||
- 2.3 覆盖率表含业务描述列
|
||||
- API 源字段表含业务描述列 + 多示例值(枚举值解释)
|
||||
- ODS 表结构含业务描述列 + 上下游双向映射锚点链接
|
||||
- DWD 表结构含业务描述列 + ODS 来源锚点链接
|
||||
5. 输出文件路径和关键统计摘要
|
||||
|
||||
白名单规则(v4):
|
||||
- ETL 元数据列(source_file, source_endpoint, fetched_at, payload, content_hash)
|
||||
- DWD 维表 SCD2 管理列(valid_from, valid_to, is_current, etl_loaded_at, etl_batch_id)
|
||||
- API siteProfile 嵌套对象字段
|
||||
- 白名单字段仍正常参与检查和统计,仅在报告中折叠显示并注明原因
|
||||
|
||||
注意:当前仅分析飞球(feiqiu)连接器。未来新增连接器时,应自动发现并纳入分析范围。
|
||||
2. <implicit-rules>## Implicit Rules
|
||||
Focus on creating a new spec file or identifying an existing spec to update.
|
||||
If starting a new spec, create a requirements.md file in the .kiro/specs directory with clear user stories and acceptance criteria.
|
||||
If working with an existing spec, review the current requirements and suggest improvements if needed.
|
||||
Do not make direct code changes yet. First establish or review the spec file that will guide our implementation.</implicit-rules>
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
METADATA:
|
||||
The previous conversation had 2 messages.
|
||||
|
||||
INSTRUCTIONS:
|
||||
Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided.
|
||||
IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user