- [P20260223-033426] 2026-02-23 03:34:26 +0800 - summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: PRD Docum… - prompt: ```text CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: PRD Document Review and Q&A Generation **STATUS**: done **USER QUERIES**: 1-4 (Initial request to review PRD, collect project status, generate Q&A document) **DETAILS**: - Reviewed `docs/prd/小程序前后端.txt` for a billiard hall operations mini-program - Collected extensive project status from real databases via MCP PostgreSQL tools - Generated comprehensive Q&A document with 30+ questions across 5 categories - User filled in all answers in Round 1 **FILEPATHS**: - `docs/prd/PRD审阅-Q&A.md` (Round 1 Q&A with all user answers) - `docs/prd/小程序前后端.txt` (source PRD) - `docs/prd/SPI 消费力指数.md` (SPI index design document) --- ## TASK 2: Round 2 Q&A Generation and Processing **STATUS**: done **USER QUERIES**: 5-8 (Generate R2 Q&A, user filled answers, asked if R3 needed) **DETAILS**: - Generated Round 2 Q&A with 18 questions across 8 areas - User filled in all answers with significant new information: - Task types confirmed as exactly 4: 高优先召回/优先召回/客户回访/关系构建 - Task state machine: active/inactive + expires_at mechanism with detailed examples - Data backfill: triggered when recall completion detected, reclassifies notes + triggers AI scoring - Tenant admin is INDEPENDENT web app (not part of admin-web), with tenant-level and store-level admins - User can belong to multiple stores (chain scenario) - "申请身份" is free text, admin assigns actual role during review - Excel: 4 types now (added 充值业绩归属表), same assistant can have multiple adjustments per month - Penalty rule 1 (self-booking detection) dropped - handled operationally - Penalty exemption: just a flag on the record, no approval workflow - AI: all 6 apps are independent百炼 apps with separate app_ids - AI entries: ALL pages use 应用1 → chat.html; 应用2-6 are backend polling tasks - SPI replaces "最大消费潜力" sorting dimension - ETL post-launch: hourly incremental (not full refresh) - Board pages need cache layer - User proposed a unified "trigger mechanism" for all condition-based events - Determined no Round 3 needed **FILEPATHS**: - `docs/prd/PRD审阅-Q&A-R2.md` (Round 2 Q&A with all user answers) --- ## TASK 3: API Key Migration **STATUS**: done **USER QUERIES**: Part of Q&A follow-up actions **DETAILS**: - Moved `BAILIAN_API_KEY` and `BAILIAN_TEST_APP_ID` from PRD to `.env` - Updated `.env.template` with placeholder variables - Replaced values in PRD with variable name references **FILEPATHS**: - `.env` (added BAILIAN_API_KEY and BAILIAN_TEST_APP_ID) - `.env.template` (added placeholder entries) - `docs/prd/小程序前后端.txt` (replaced hardcoded values with variable references) --- ## TASK 4: Data Dependency Matrix and SPEC Task Decomposition **STATUS**: done **USER QUERIES**: 9-12 (User confirmed R2 answers, asked to proceed to next phase) **DETAILS**: - Queried real database schemas via MCP tools (dwd, dws, app, fdw_etl, public in both test DBs) - Confirmed: `app` schema empty, `fdw_etl` schema empty, DWS has 32 tables, DWD has 42 tables - Generated complete data dependency matrix mapping all pages to data sources - Generated 11 SPEC documents (P1-P11) ordered by dependency priority - Each SPEC contains: requirements, user stories, acceptance criteria, design points, task checklist **Key architectural decisions documented**: - `test_zqyy_app` split into `auth` + `biz` + `fdw_etl` schemas - RLS views in `test_etl_feiqiu.app` schema → FDW maps to these views - ~33 FDW external tables needed - New ETL tables: `dws_member_spending_power_index`, `dws_assistant_order_contribution` - Extended tables: `dws_member_consumption_summary` (recharge windows), `dws_assistant_daily_detail` (penalty fields) - New biz tables: `coach_tasks`, `coach_task_history`, `notes`, `ai_conversations`, `ai_messages`, `ai_cache`, `salary_adjustments`, `excel_upload_log`, `trigger_jobs` - Four statistics naming: 订单总流水/订单净流水/时效贡献流水/时效净贡献 **All 13 files generated**: - `docs/prd/specs/00-数据依赖矩阵.md` - `docs/prd/specs/01-SPEC任务拆分总览.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P1-miniapp-db-foundation.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P2-etl-dws-miniapp-extensions.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P3-miniapp-auth-system.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P4-miniapp-core-business.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P5-miniapp-ai-integration.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P6-miniapp-fe-tasks.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P7-miniapp-fe-performance.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P8-miniapp-fe-boards.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P9-miniapp-fe-details.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P10-tenant-admin-web.md` - `docs/prd/specs/P11-deployment-launch.md` **FILEPATHS**: All 13 files listed above --- ## USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS: - ALL responses must be in simplified Chinese (强制) - This is a B2B mini-program for billiard hall STAFF, NOT customers - All development uses test databases (`test_etl_feiqiu` / `test_zqyy_app`) - Mini-program database tables/schemas are completely unbuilt - need full design - User wants Kiro SPEC-driven development workflow - API keys must never appear in PRD documents - Follow all steering rules (export-paths, governance, language-zh, tech, structure-lite, product, testing-env) - The audit reminder hook fires but can be ignored for documentation-only changes - Tenant admin is a completely separate web app from `apps/admin-web/` - Tenant has stores underneath; tenant-level admins manage store-level admins - User proposed unified "trigger mechanism" for condition-based events (documented in P4) - `customer_tier` in `dws_member_consumption_summary` is replaced by SPI index - Board-finance.html duplicate sections need merging (deferred to final PRD revision) - Execution order: P1 → P2/P3 (parallel) → P4 → P5 → P6-P9 (partial parallel) → P10 (can start early) → P11 --- ## Files to read: - `docs/prd/PRD审阅-Q&A.md` - `docs/prd/PRD审阅-Q&A-R2.md` - `docs/prd/specs/00-数据依赖矩阵.md` - `docs/prd/specs/01-SPEC任务拆分总览.md` - `docs/prd/小程序前后端.txt` - `docs/prd/SPI 消费力指数.md` USER QUERIES(most recent first): 1. 第二轮我更新好了，看还需要第三轮么？ 2. Output: Command executed successfully with no output. Exit Code: 0 3. Output: Command executed successfully with no output. Exit Code: 0 4. 第二轮我更新好了，看还需要第三轮么？ 5. Output: Command executed successfully with no output. Exit Code: 0 --- METADATA: The previous conversation had 4 messages. INSTRUCTIONS: Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided. IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section ```