9.9 KiB
- [P20260220-103424] 2026-02-20 10:34:24 +0800
- summary: CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary: --- ## TASK 1: Full Prod…
- prompt:
CONTEXT TRANSFER: We are continuing a conversation that had gotten too long. Here is a summary:
---
## TASK 1: Full Production Integration Test (api_full, verify_only, custom window)
**STATUS**: done
**USER QUERIES**: Initial context transfer, "继续监测 并debug", "定期检查并DEBUG"
**DETAILS**:
- ETL run `896b9647-4e3a-4e10-ac23-e6f59ee9c114` completed successfully
- `exit_code=0`, total duration 5,135 seconds (~85 minutes)
- 22 ODS tasks executed: 21 SUCC, 1 FAIL (`ODS_ASSISTANT_LEDGER` — expected JSONB bug, fix already in code)
- Top data volumes: `ODS_PLATFORM_COUPON` (219,732 records, 27min), `ODS_PAYMENT` (130,560, 13min), `ODS_TABLE_USE` (110,598, 16min)
- `verify_only` mode only executes ODS fetch + verification, does NOT run DWD/DWS tasks (by design)
- DWS/INDEX layers explicitly skipped in `_run_verification()` with `"lightweight_dws_index"` reason
- Reports generated: `etl_timing_20260220_091414.md` and `consistency_report_20260220_091414.md`
**FILEPATHS**:
- `export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/REPORTS/etl_timing_20260220_091414.md`
- `export/ETL-Connectors/feiqiu/REPORTS/consistency_report_20260220_091414.md`
---
## TASK 2: Fix consistency report issues (missing DWD fields + whitelist)
**STATUS**: in-progress
**USER QUERIES**: "2张dwd表省略 缺少的字段补齐", "fetched_at作为update_time这合理么?", "increment_only 和 increment_verify 模式怎么运作的?"
**DETAILS**:
- Consistency report showed 4 issues:
1. `dwd.dim_member.update_time` — missing ODS mapping
2. `dwd.dwd_member_balance_change.principal_change_amount` — missing ODS mapping
3. `dwd.dwd_goods_stock_movement` — DWD table doesn't exist (user said skip)
4. `dwd.dwd_goods_stock_summary` — DWD table doesn't exist (user said skip)
- **`principal_change_amount` fix (DONE)**: Added mapping `COALESCE(CAST(principal_after AS numeric),0) - COALESCE(CAST(principal_before AS numeric),0)` in `FACT_MAPPINGS`
- **`update_time` fix (REVISED)**:
- Initially mapped to `fetched_at`, but user correctly pointed out `fetched_at` is ETL ingestion time, not business update time
- Confirmed via DB query: upstream API payload has NO `update_time`/`modify_time` field — only `create_time`
- Reverted the `fetched_at` mapping, now keeping it as NULL with a comment explaining why
- Started adding a `KNOWN_NO_SOURCE` whitelist dict in `check_ods_vs_dwd_mappings()` in `consistency_checker.py`
- **Whitelist implementation (PARTIALLY DONE — CUT OFF)**:
- Added `KNOWN_NO_SOURCE` dict at top of `check_ods_vs_dwd_mappings()` with `{"dwd.dim_member": {"update_time"}}`
- BUT: the actual logic to USE this whitelist (checking `col_lower in KNOWN_NO_SOURCE.get(dwd_table, set())` in the `else` branch that currently marks fields as "missing") was NOT yet added before context was cut off
- Need to also add `"dwd.dwd_member_balance_change": {"principal_change_amount"}` — wait, this one WAS mapped via FACT_MAPPINGS expression, so it should pass now. Only `dim_member.update_time` needs the whitelist.
- **Other fixes done in this session**:
- `test_cli_args.py`: Added `force_full=False` to `_make_args` defaults (was causing test failure)
- `README.md`: Added `--force-full` parameter documentation to CLI parameter table
- All 738 unit tests passing
- **User's unanswered question**: "increment_only 和 increment_verify 模式怎么运作的?" — needs explanation based on `flow_runner.py` code
**NEXT STEPS**:
1. Complete the whitelist logic in `consistency_checker.py` — add the branch in the `else` clause (around line 250) that checks `KNOWN_NO_SOURCE` before marking as "missing":
```python
no_source = KNOWN_NO_SOURCE.get(dwd_table, set())
if col_lower in no_source:
result.field_results.append(FieldCheckResult(col, "pass", "已知无源字段(上游 API 不提供)"))
result.passed_fields += 1
else:
# existing missing logic
- Answer user's question about
increment_onlyvsincrement_verifymodes (traceflow_runner.pycode):increment_only: runstask_executor.run_tasks()for all resolved layers (ODS→DWD→DWS→INDEX), no verificationincrement_verify: same as above, then additionally runs_run_verification()after
- Run unit tests again to confirm whitelist change doesn't break anything
FILEPATHS:
apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_load_task.py(MODIFIED — principal_change_amount mapping added, update_time reverted to NULL)apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/consistency_checker.py(PARTIALLY MODIFIED — KNOWN_NO_SOURCE dict added but logic to use it NOT yet implemented)apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tests/unit/test_cli_args.py(MODIFIED — force_full default)apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/docs/etl_tasks/README.md(MODIFIED — --force-full docs)
TASK 3: ODS_ASSISTANT_LEDGER JSONB fix (from prior session)
STATUS: done (code fix applied, awaiting next ETL run to verify)
DETAILS:
_mark_missing_as_deletedinods_tasks.pynow detects ALL JSONB columns viacols_infoudt_name and wraps dict/list values withJson()- Fix at line ~654 with CHANGE comment dated 2026-02-20
- This run used old code (started before fix), so
ODS_ASSISTANT_LEDGERstill failed as expected
FILEPATHS: apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/ods/ods_tasks.py
KEY ARCHITECTURE (for new agent reference):
- Frontend: React + Vite + Ant Design at
apps/admin-web/(localhost:5173) - Backend: FastAPI at
apps/backend/(localhost:8000) - ETL subprocess launched by backend
task_executor.py - Auth: JWT tokens in localStorage
- ETL data goes to
test_etl_feiqiudatabase, execution logs totest_zqyy_app.public.task_execution_log - Four DB connections available:
mcp_pg_etl(etl_feiqiu),mcp_pg_etl_test(test_etl_feiqiu),mcp_pg_app(zqyy_app),mcp_pg_app_test(test_zqyy_app)
USER CORRECTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
- All output text must be in simplified Chinese (language-zh.md steering)
- All file outputs must go through
export/directory structure via.envenvironment variables - Changes to high-risk paths require
/audittrigger - Python scripts preferred over PowerShell for complex operations
- Audit reminder is pending for: root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:db, db-schema-change, dir:tasks
- User explicitly asked to verify code claims — don't speculate about behavior, trace the actual code path
fetched_atis ETL ingestion timestamp, NOT business update time — don't confuse them- User said to skip the 2 missing DWD tables (
dwd_goods_stock_movement,dwd_goods_stock_summary)
Files to read
apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/quality/consistency_checker.py(IN PROGRESS — need to complete KNOWN_NO_SOURCE whitelist logic)apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/tasks/dwd/dwd_load_task.py(verify current state of FACT_MAPPINGS for dim_member and dwd_member_balance_change)apps/etl/connectors/feiqiu/orchestration/flow_runner.py(to answer user's question about increment_only vs increment_verify modes)
USER QUERIES(most recent first):
- verify_only 模式下,代码只执行 ODS 抓取 + 校验,DWD(DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS)和 DWS 聚合任务不会被 run_tasks() 调用。这是设计行为。要跑 DWD+DWS,需要用 increment_only 或 increment_verify 模式。最合理的映射是用 fetched_at 作为 update_time这合理么?我记得 fetched_at 是入库时间吧?难道我记错了?increment_only 和 increment_verify 模式怎么运作的?
- Output: Command executed successfully with no output.
Exit Code: 0 3. Output: Command executed successfully with no output.
Exit Code: 0 4. verify_only 模式下,代码只执行 ODS 抓取 + 校验,DWD(DWD_LOAD_FROM_ODS)和 DWS 聚合任务不会被 run_tasks() 调用。这是设计行为。要跑 DWD+DWS,需要用 increment_only 或 increment_verify 模式。最合理的映射是用 fetched_at 作为 update_time这合理么?我记得 fetched_at 是入库时间吧?难道我记错了?increment_only 和 increment_verify 模式怎么运作的? 5. Output: Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
Error output: [AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
Exit Code: 1 6. Output: Command executed successfully with no output.
Exit Code: 0 7. Output: Command executed successfully with no output.
Exit Code: 0 8. 2张dwd表省略 缺少的字段补齐 dwd和 DWS没有执行么? 9. Output: Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
Error output: [AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
Exit Code: 1 10. Output: Command executed successfully with no output.
Exit Code: 0 11. Output: Command executed successfully with no output.
Exit Code: 0 12. 继续监测 并debug 13. Output: Hook execution failed with exit code 1.
Error output: [AUDIT REMINDER] Pending audit detected (root-file, dir:admin-web, dir:backend, dir:db, db-schema-change). Run /audit (Manual: Run /audit hook) to sync docs & write audit artifacts. (rate limit: 15min)
Exit Code: 1 14. Output: Command executed successfully with no output.
Exit Code: 0 15. Output: Command executed successfully with no output.
Exit Code: 0
METADATA: The previous conversation had 8 messages.
INSTRUCTIONS: Continue working until the user query has been fully addressed. Do not ask for clarification - proceed with the work based on the context provided. IMPORTANT: you need to read from the files to Read section